The mass release of millions of files related to Jeffrey Epstein serves as a metaphor for a wider crisis of the digital age: an overabundance of information that obscures rather than illuminates the truth. In an era where data floods replace traditional censorship, citizens risk becoming less informed, underscoring the vital role of professional journalism in filtering noise into meaningful knowledge.

In India’s conflict-ridden regions like Bastar and Manipur, local journalists—especially freelancers and women—risk their lives daily to report on corruption, displacement, and state violence, often without institutional support or protection. Their work, largely invisible to national media, exposes a stark reality where telling the truth can cost them everything, even their lives.

In this article, we compile testimonies from journalists who have criticised their own media institutions as documented in reports, letters, or interviews. Most spoke anonymously out of fear of repercussions—because freedom of expression appears protected only until it reaches the borders of Israel. At that point, constraints emerge, editorial policies shift, and the system of double standards is activated.