Al Jazeera Journalism Review

A Pakistani walks past a poster of Imran Khan, head of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, at a market in Islamabad, Pakistan, Saturday, July 28, 2018. (AP Photo/Anjum Naveed)
A Pakistani walks past a poster of Imran Khan, head of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party, at a market in Islamabad, Pakistan, Saturday, July 28, 2018. (AP Photo/Anjum Naveed)

Media Blackout on Imran Khan and PTI: Analysing Pakistan's Election Press Restrictions

As the chapters of Pakistan's 2024 elections unfolded, transforming the streets into a vivid canvas of political symbols—ranging from tiger-stuffed toys perched atop campaign vehicles representing the Pakistan Muslim League (PMLN) to arrow logos painted on walls referring to the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP)—the notable absence of posters featuring the popular former Prime Minister, Imran Khan, and the scarcity of flags representing his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), left a striking gap in the narrative.

This absence, evident not only in public spaces like lamp posts and billboards but also on national television screens, showed a deliberate control influenced by media censorship.

numerous Pakistani journalists revealed that they had received instructions from an official within the country's influential military to enforce this almost comprehensive ban on the political party's coverage leading up to the elections

Understanding Media Censorship in Pakistan

The first signs of these restrictions emerged on March 6, 2023, after Khan's strong speech against the military. The imposition of restrictions heightened notably as riots broke out following his arrest on May 9th, 2023. In a complicated relationship with Pakistan's military, Khan finds himself banned, with the military's influence contributing significantly to the decision. No longer holding the leadership position of his party, he continues to be a significantly popular political figure in Pakistan, even while in prison and barred from contesting elections.

After his arrest, a shroud of silence enveloped the Pakistani media. But, as the election campaign season progressed, these restrictions intensified. Media channels were explicitly prohibited from showcasing the flags of PTI and airing any of their prior campaigns. Affiliated candidates had independent status, while the media consciously avoided acknowledging their connections with Imran Khan's party. In an exclusive report by Al Jazeera, numerous Pakistani journalists revealed that they had received instructions from an official within the country's influential military to enforce this almost comprehensive ban on the political party's coverage leading up to the elections.

In the Spotlight: Case Studies of Media Censorship in Pakistan

On the day of the elections, February 8, 2024, a journalist on the national Pakistani channel, Express News, posed the question, "So who will win, the tiger or the arrow?" Hinting at a conscious decision to favour or acknowledge only these two parties (PMLN and PPP), the journalist intentionally avoided independent candidates associated with Khan, who are leading in the final results.

This reliance on other platforms indicates a perceived lack of space for critical discourse domestically, highlighting the importance of a robust and open media environment for a thriving democracy and the free exchange of ideas.

Such a controlled media environment during election campaigns limits the public's access to diverse viewpoints, hinders informed decision-making, and undermines the principles of fair and transparent elections. Such restrictions can skew the narrative in favour of one party, suppressing dissenting voices and raising questions about the authenticity of the electoral process. A vibrant and independent media is essential for fostering a democratic society, and any attempts to curtail its influence can have far-reaching consequences for the democratic values that elections aim to uphold.

A supporter stands beside a poster of imprisoned leader Pakistan's Former Prime Minister Imran Khan display at his party office, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Friday, Feb. 9, 2024.
A supporter stands beside a poster of imprisoned leader Pakistan's Former Prime Minister Imran Khan display at his party office, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Friday, Feb. 9, 20204. Independent candidates backed by Khan's party were leading Pakistan's national election results, a day after sporadic violence, allegations of a preordained outcome and a cell phone service shutdown overshadowed the vote. (AP Photo/Anjum Naveed)

However, on the same day, during a broadcast on another prominent news channel, ARY News, notable journalists, Iqrar Ul Hassan and Waseem Badami, made mention of 'PTI' and 'Imran Khan' while discussing the election results. They specifically discussed individual candidates associated with the party, including well-known figures like Zain Qureshi, the son of PTI's senior vice president, Shah Mahmood Qureshi. These candidates were impossible to ignore due to their widely recognised identities. Additionally, the journalists analysed the constituencies in electoral success, drawing comparisons to Imran Khan and his party's victories in the 2018 elections. A notable incident occurred in July 2023 when ARY News faced severe criticism for blurring Khan's photo during the live telecast of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) meeting.

 

As the ban on mentioning Khan's name or displaying his picture grew more pervasive in Pakistani media, local journalists turned to international publications to express their opinions and reactions. For example, back in June 2023, Hamid Mir, a Pakistani TV news anchor and author, wrote an opinion piece for The Guardian titled "I literally cannot say Imran Khan’s name on Pakistani TV—this madness has to end," where he mentioned the challenges of even openly criticising him on air. Pakistani journalists have also contributed to Al Jazeera's podcast platform "The Take" and written opinion pieces to openly express their views on Khan during the current situation. This reliance on other platforms indicates a perceived lack of space for critical discourse domestically, highlighting the importance of a robust and open media environment for a thriving democracy and the free exchange of ideas.

When Pakistani media avoided covering PTI and Imran Khan but prominently featured PMLN leader, Nawaz Sharif, suggesting an increasing likelihood of him forming the next government, it created the perception of biased coverage. On Feb 11, Kamran Khan, President and Editor-in-Chief of Dunya Media Group, expressed concern in a tweet featuring a screenshot of "The News" newspaper that carried the headline, "Public's Decision for Nawaz's Vision. Nawaz Sharif, the PM."

Tweet: "Just 48 hours before the election, Nawaz Sharif's PMLN spent hundreds of millions of rupees to enact this paid ad of deceit, lies, and outright deception on the front pages of almost every major newspaper in Pakistan. The Election Commission of Pakistan allowed this to happen, as it allowed Shahbaz Sharif's TV interview on the election eve. The bottom line is that nothing worked. The PTI was not allowed a single rupee worth of TV newspaper ad, not any public or corner meeting, nor an election symbol, yet they defeated the state's blue-eyed thugs all across Pakistan."

Ultimately, despite attempts at media manipulation, Nawaz Sharif secured fewer seats than the candidates individually supporting Khan.

Another piece published on Feb 1 by Dawn News, titled "The Return of Nawaz," suggested that the tide had been gradually turning in his favour for months, anticipating a swift acceleration in the coming weeks.

Similar Censorship Cases in Turkiye and Russia

In a different political landscape, with the upcoming 2024 presidential elections on the horizon in Russia, President Vladimir Putin has also implemented new media restrictions. These regulations aim to limit coverage of Central Election Commission sessions solely to registered media outlets, potentially excluding freelancers or independent journalists. The amendments also explicitly prohibit media reporting on the commission's activities at military bases or in regions under martial law without prior clearance from regional and military authorities. Similar to Pakistan's situation, this will marginalise independent voices and suppress alternative perspectives. It will reinforce the government's narrative and hinder the public's access to unbiased information, potentially impeding transparency and independent scrutiny of electoral processes.

Television crew prepare in front of of a big screen showing results of country's parliamentary elections at Pakistan Election Commission headquarters, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Friday, Feb. 9, 2024. The results of Pakistan's elections were delayed a day after the vote that was marred by sporadic violence, a mobile phone service shutdown and the sidelining of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his party. (AP Photo/Anjum Naveed)
Television crew prepare in front of of a big screen showing results of country's parliamentary elections at Pakistan Election Commission headquarters, in Islamabad, Pakistan, Friday, Feb. 9, 2024. The results of Pakistan's elections were delayed a day after the vote that was marred by sporadic violence, a mobile phone service shutdown and the sidelining of former Prime Minister Imran Khan and his party. (AP Photo/Anjum Naveed)

Ultimately, despite attempts at media manipulation, Nawaz Sharif secured fewer seats than the candidates individually supporting Khan.

Another illustrative example showcasing the intricate relations between the media and the military can be observed in Turkey. On July 15, 2016, elements within the Turkish military attempted to overthrow the democratically elected government led by President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and seize control of crucial institutions, including media outlets. Soldiers took control of television stations, such as CNN Turk, forcefully shutting down live broadcasts. However, their efforts were ultimately stopped, as the government managed to regain control. After suppressing the coup attempt, the government initiated a broad crackdown on media outlets critical of President Erdoğan and his party, as part of its response to what it considered a threat to the country's stability. Numerous journalists were arrested, newspapers were shut down, and broadcasters were taken off the air. This crackdown created a restrictive environment, limiting the media's ability to scrutinise government actions and hold authorities thoroughly accountable.

Laws related to national security, blasphemy, and other sensitive topics can be manipulated to restrict media content.

As a result, media insiders and observers argue that the news narrative in Turkey is often shaped to favour Erdoğan and his government. A Reuters special report, titled "Insiders reveal how Erdogan tamed Turkey’s newsrooms," vividly illustrates this transformation of Turkey's once-vibrant media, now dominated by a tightly controlled chain of government-approved headlines, front pages, and topics for TV debate.

 

Unveiling the Mechanisms: How Media Censorship Operates in Pakistan

So, how does such censorship operate in Pakistan? Is it systematic, following established mechanisms, or is it imposed arbitrarily?

Understanding the mechanisms through which censorship operates in Pakistan requires a nuanced perspective that considers legal frameworks, regulatory bodies, arbitrary enforcement, internet controls, national security justifications, military influence, and self-censorship.

In some cases, censorship operates within a legal framework established by the government. Laws may be enacted to regulate media content, restrict specific topics, or curb certain forms of expression. The Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) has been criticised for its potential use in curbing freedom of expression. Laws related to national security, blasphemy, and other sensitive topics can be manipulated to restrict media content.

Regulatory bodies also play a crucial role in overseeing and implementing censorship policies. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) is responsible for regulating electronic media in the country. Authorities may use regulatory measures to control media narratives by issuing directives to outlets or even revoking licenses. While PEMRA didn't officially issue any statement restricting coverage of a specific party during the election season, it did issue a ban on airing Khan’s speeches on March 5, 2023. It warned that violators would have their licenses cancelled. On the same day, ARY News had its license suspended for airing a speech by Khan, as reported by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ).

In the same report, CPJ's Asia program coordinator, Beh Lih Yi, described this as:

"Pakistan’s ban on satellite television channels broadcasting former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s speeches and the suspension of ARY News’ license are the government’s latest attacks on press freedom and the right to information. Authorities must immediately reverse these blatant acts of censorship and allow the media to report on key political developments in the country freely."

Authorities may use regulatory measures to control media narratives by issuing directives to outlets or even revoking licenses.

Supporters of imprisoned Pakistan's Former Prime Minister Imran Khan's and Jamaat-e-Islami party chant slogans during a protest against the delaying result of parliamentary election by Pakistan Election Commission, in Karachi, Pakistan, Saturday, Feb. 10, 2024. Pakistan on Saturday hit back at criticism over the conduct of its parliamentary elections, which were held amid sporadic militant attacks and an unprecedented stoppage of all mobile phone services. (AP Photo/Fareed Khan)
Supporters of imprisoned Pakistan's Former Prime Minister Imran Khan's and Jamaat-e-Islami party chant slogans during a protest against the delaying result of parliamentary election by Pakistan Election Commission, in Karachi, Pakistan, Saturday, Feb. 10, 2024. Pakistan on Saturday hit back at criticism over the conduct of its parliamentary elections, which were held amid sporadic militant attacks and an unprecedented stoppage of all mobile phone services. (AP Photo/Fareed Khan)

However, censorship in Pakistan can sometimes be arbitrary, with authorities selectively targeting media outlets or journalists based on their coverage or perceived biases. Journalists critical of the government may face harassment, threats, or legal action, leading to self-censorship within the media industry. For example, in May 2021, Hamid Mir, a prominent journalist and Pakistani talk show host of the "Capital Talk" news program, on the Geo News network, was suspended after critical comments on the military.

The military can control media censorship too, either directly or indirectly, influencing narratives considered sensitive or against national interests. However, this involvement raises concerns about the autonomy of media outlets and their ability to operate independently.

Censorship in Pakistan can sometimes be arbitrary, with authorities selectively targeting media outlets or journalists based on their coverage or perceived biases.

Moreover, Pakistan's government can control access to information on the internet, particularly on social media platforms. This can involve blocking websites or platforms, limiting internet speeds, or monitoring online activities. On Feb 8, the day of the elections, the government temporarily suspended mobile phone services.

In the current scenario, it appears that the ban on PTI and Imran Khan in Pakistan appears to be a complex mixture of systemic measures and arbitrary decisions, reflecting a blend of structured regulations and ad-hoc implementation.

 

Charting the Way Forward: Responses to Media Censorship

In response to this censorship, PTI adopted innovative approaches to challenge restrictions. Notably, the party utilised artificial intelligence (AI) to produce audio clips featuring Khan's synthesised voice, generated from text he had written in prison and approved by his lawyers. This AI-generated message was broadcast during a virtual rally and also when declaring victory after the final results. In addition, PTI creatively embraced online platforms such as YouTube and TikTok for virtual rallies to connect with the audience and navigate the limitations imposed on traditional campaigning.

Yet, censorship directed at such influential political figures can have far-reaching consequences for society. It may lead to lower political engagement and voter turnout. Nevertheless, despite such challenges, voter turnout remained at almost 48 percent in these elections, representing only a decrease of 3 percent compared to the previous general elections.

In addition, censorship can contribute to a decline in public trust in media outlets, as the public may perceive restrictions as an attempt to manipulate information. This erosion of trust can have long-term consequences for the credibility of media organisations. Supporters of the censored party may perceive the restrictions as unfair, leading to heightened polarisation and the potential for social unrest.

Meanwhile, journalists, afraid of facing consequences, might choose to censor themselves to stay within the rules. This self-censorship can hinder investigative journalism, restricting the public's access to important information about political figures and events.

Lastly, and most importantly, such censorship has the potential to shape international perceptions of Pakistan's commitment to democratic values and freedom of the press. It could impact diplomatic relations and Pakistan's standing in the international community.

More Articles

Are Podcasts the Future of African Broadcasting?

The surge of podcasts across Africa is a burgeoning trend, encompassing a wide array of themes and subjects, and swiftly expanding across various nations.

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 11 Jul, 2024
Video Volunteers: How India’s Marginalised Groups Tell Their Own Stories

Video creators like Rohini Pawar and Shabnam Begum have transcended societal challenges by producing influential videos with Video Volunteers, highlighting social issues within marginalized communities. Their work exemplifies the transformative power of storytelling in fostering grassroots change and empowerment across India.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Jul, 2024
Climate Journalism in Vietnam's Censored Landscape

In Vietnam, climate journalists face challenges due to censorship and restrictions on press freedom, making it difficult to report environmental issues accurately. Despite these obstacles, there are still journalists working to cover climate stories creatively and effectively, highlighting the importance of climate journalism in addressing environmental concerns.

AJR Contributor Published on: 26 Jun, 2024
Challenges of Investigating Subculture Stories in Japan as a Foreign Correspondent

Japan's vibrant subcultures and feminist activists challenge the reductive narratives often portrayed in Western media. To understand this dynamic society authentically, journalists must approach their reporting with patience, commitment, and empathy, shedding preconceptions and engaging deeply with the nuances of Japanese culture.

Johann Fleuri
Johann Fleuri Published on: 24 Jun, 2024
Covering the War on Gaza: As a Journalist, Mother, and Displaced Person

What takes precedence: feeding a hungry child or providing professional coverage of a genocidal war? Journalist Marah Al Wadiya shares her story of balancing motherhood, displacement, psychological turmoil, and the relentless struggle to find safety in an unsafe region.

Marah Al Wadiya
Marah Al Wadiya Published on: 29 May, 2024
Fighting Misinformation and Disinformation to Foster Social Governance in Africa

Experts in Africa are using various digital media tools to raise awareness and combat the increasing usage of misinformation and disinformation to manipulate social governance.

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 22 May, 2024
"I Am Still Alive!": The Resilient Voices of Gaza's Journalists

The Israeli occupation has escalated from targeting journalists to intimidating and killing their families. Hisham Zaqqout, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Gaza talks about his experience covering the war and the delicate balance between family obligations and professional duty.

Hisham Zakkout Published on: 15 May, 2024
Under Fire: The Perilous Reality for Journalists in Gaza's War Zone

Journalists lack safety equipment and legal protection, highlighting the challenges faced by journalists in Gaza. While Israel denies responsibility for targeting journalists, the lack of international intervention leaves journalists in Gaza exposed to daily danger.

Linda Shalash
Linda Shalash Published on: 9 May, 2024
Elections and Misinformation – India Case Study

Realities are hidden behind memes and political satire in the battle for truth in the digital age. Explore how misinformation is influencing political decisions and impacting first-time voters, especially in India's 2024 elections, and how journalists fact-check and address fake news, revealing the true impact of misinformation and AI-generated content.

Safina
Safina Nabi Published on: 30 Apr, 2024
Amid Increasing Pressure, Journalists in India Practice More Self-Censorship

In a country where nearly 970 million people are participating in a crucial general election, the state of journalism in India is under scrutiny. Journalists face harassment, self-censorship, and attacks, especially under the current Modi-led government. Mainstream media also practices self-censorship to avoid repercussions. The future of journalism in India appears uncertain, but hope lies in the resilience of independent media outlets.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 25 Apr, 2024
The Privilege and Burden of Conflict Reporting in Nigeria: Navigating the Emotional Toll

The internal struggle and moral dilemmas faced by a conflict reporter, as they grapple with the overwhelming nature of the tragedies they witness and the sense of helplessness in the face of such immense suffering. It ultimately underscores the vital role of conflict journalism in preserving historical memory and giving a voice to the voiceless.

Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu
Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu Published on: 17 Apr, 2024
Journalism in chains in Cameroon

Investigative journalists in Cameroon sometimes use treacherous means to navigate the numerous challenges that hamper the practice of their profession: the absence of the Freedom of Information Act, the criminalisation of press offenses, and the scare of the overly-broad anti-terrorism law.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 12 Apr, 2024
The Perils of Journalism and the Rise of Citizen Media in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia's media landscape is grim, with low rankings for internet and press freedom across the region. While citizen journalism has risen to fill the gaps, journalists - both professional and citizen - face significant risks due to government crackdowns and the collusion between tech companies and authorities to enable censorship and surveillance.

AJR Contributor Published on: 6 Apr, 2024
Silenced Voices: The Battle for Free Expression Amid India’s Farmer’s Protest

The Indian government's use of legal mechanisms to suppress dissenting voices and news reports raises questions about transparency and freedom of expression. The challenges faced by independent media in India indicate a broader narrative of controlling the narrative and stifling dissenting voices.

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 17 Mar, 2024
Targeting Truth: Assault on Female Journalists in Gaza

For female journalists in Palestine, celebrating international women's rights this year must take a backseat, as they continue facing the harsh realities of conflict. March 8th will carry little celebration for them, as they grapple with the severe risks of violence, mass displacement, and the vulnerability of abandonment amidst an ongoing humanitarian crisis. Their focus remains on bearing witness to human suffering and sharing stories of resilience from the frontlines, despite the personal dangers involved in their work.

Fatima Bashir
Fatima Bashir Published on: 14 Mar, 2024
A Woman's Journey Reporting on Pakistan's Thrilling Cholistan Desert Jeep Rally

A Woman's Voice in the Desert: Navigating the Spotlight

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 8 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Digital Battlegrounds: The New Broadcasting Bill and Independent Journalism in India

New legislation in India threatens the freedom of independent journalism. The draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023 grants the government extensive power to regulate and censor content, potentially suppressing news critical of government policies.

Safina
Safina Nabi Published on: 11 Feb, 2024
Pegasus Spyware: A Grave Threat to Journalists in Southeast Asia

The widespread deployment of spyware such as Pegasus in Southeast Asia, used by governments to target opposition leaders, activists, and journalists, presents significant challenges in countering digital surveillance. This is due to its clandestine operations and the political intricacies involved. The situation underscores the urgent need for international cooperation and heightened public awareness to address these human rights infringements.

AJR Contributor Published on: 5 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
Cameroonian Media Martyrs: The Intersection of Journalism and Activism

Experts and journalists in Cameroon disagree on the relationship between journalism and activism: some say journalism is activism; others think they are worlds apart, while another category says a “very thin” line separate both

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 28 Jan, 2024