Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Hate speech 1
ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN: A group of attorneys take part in a protest against cartoons deemed offensive to Muslims during a peaceful demonstration, on February 15, 2006 in Islamabad, Pakistan. Speakers, representing mostly moderate Muslims, condemned the cartoons and the western media that published them for fomenting hate between the Islamic world and the West and sparking riots across Pakistan. [John Moore/Getty Images]

How to avoid stirring up hate through your reporting

In part two of our series on how the media can propagate hate speech, we look at ways that journalists can ensure their work is balanced and objective, to avoid this.


When dealing with controversial topics, discrimination and incitement to hatred can only be avoided if journalists are careful to maintain professionalism and keep to the rules of ethical coverage. As long as they do this, journalists can be safe in the knowledge that their coverage will not cause any harm. 

“It is obvious to anyone familiar with Libyan media that outlets are biased in favour of particular parties to the conflict,” says Libyan journalist Ismail Al Giritli. “They rely on sources from their preferred party, and use language glorifying one side and demonising the other. The same applies to the lists of guests and analysts interviewed, the adverts and commercials broadcast during the breaks, the titles of news pieces, the questions asked, the issues presented and the topics discussed on discussion programmes. 

Read more

Part One - How the media can promote hate speech 
Opinion - The media must stop obsessing about 'economic migrants'


“And the correspondents of a given media outlet always operate in the areas controlled by the group their employers support. Bias also appears in how mental images are drawn for the public. Outlets neglect to define the warring parties and their geographical, ideological and political affiliations, and use images and background music promoting not just bias but broader social division. Many journalists and media officials show their bias for specific parties and use the space provided to them by social media to openly declare these biases.”

Lies and statistics

A good example of bias in the media was when a local girl was murdered in Spain by Moroccan immigrants. Ayman Al Zubeir, Madrid Correspondent for Al Jazeera, explains: “The Spanish far right was quick to exploit the crime to incite the population against the Moroccan community, using incorrect information in order to influence the electorate. One of the lies circulated by the right was a story that 70 percent of those detained in sexual harassment cases have foreign citizenship.”

But statistics from official Spanish bodies like the Instituto Nacional de Estadistica and the General Council of the Judiciary actually show the opposite. In 2017, Spanish courts handed down prison terms to 2,280 people accused of sexual assault, whose nationalities break down as follows: 1,705 were Spanish; 184 were from the Americas; 167 were from the EU; 137 from Africa; 58 from Asia; and 27 were from Eastern Europe.

Avoid hate speech 2
VALENCIA, SPAIN: Far-right wing protesters hold Spanish flags and a banner reading 'We don't want refugees' as they demonstrate against the arrival of migrants in the Aquarius ship at the port of Valencia on June 16, 2018. [Pablo Blazquez Dominguez/Getty Images]

“These numbers show that 70 percent of these crimes are committed by Spanish citizens,” says Al Zubeir. “But, despite this data, more attention is given in some media outlets to crimes committed by Moroccan immigrants. This can lead to incidents of racist violence, as in some towns in Catalonia, where refuge centers for underage migrants have been attacked.”

So how can journalists ensure they report the facts in a balanced way, which does not lead to more mis-placed resentment against migrants and refugees?

Step 1: Story planning 

Building up a base of knowledge about the incident 

Before working out sources and writing a news story, a journalist should carry out thorough research into the issue he or she will be working on and gather all available information from specialised sources (reports, statistics, academic studies etc). 

The following are some major platforms that provide journalists with reports and studies on the topics of their stories: 

Google Scholar: A search engine from Google that specialises in academic studies, making it possible to access various studies published in peer-reviewed journals as well as reports giving journalists a deeper understanding of the stories they work on. 

Microsoft Academic: A similar platform to Google Scholar containing approximately 227 thousand research papers as well as an academic CV search feature, helping journalists to identify expert sources. 

UN databases: This database includes all reports issued by the UN and its legal and human rights arms as well as all treaties, agreements and statistics released by the UN itself and by member states.

The Verification Handbook: Published by the European Journalism Center (EJC), this handbook provides tools and techniques allowing journalists to search the internet more broadly and helping them verify reports & information.

BERLIN, GERMANY: Neo-Nazis and other right-wing activists march near the chancellory under the banner "We for Berlin - We for Germany" to protest against German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy on May 7, 2016. [Photo by Carsten Koall/Getty Images]

Selecting sources 

Look at all sides of the story and select people or organisations that have been affected. For example, in a story about the effect of refugees on job opportunities in a particular country, concerned parties include: refugees, local authorities, unions and workers’ associations, local residents, employers, and economic experts. The absence of any of these parties means the story will not be objective and will be biased towards one side’s narrative over the other, meaning the story is more likely to constitute bias.

This story headline attributing high rental prices to Syrian refugees published in the Jordanian newspaper, Al Ghad, used the narrative of one side of the story (property owners) as its main source without presenting the opinions of any other relevant parties, such as Syrian refugees themselves or economic experts. This means it takes a particular direction in its reporting.

Al Ghad Newspaper
The headline of this piece published in the Jordanian newspaper, Al Ghad, states "Syrian refugees doubled the prices of rental apartments."

The most important sources that a journalist should refer to when putting together a story are: 

  • Parties directly affected by and affecting the story (citizens, refugees, workers, property-owners, traders etc).
  • Official bodies relevant to the story (mayors, relevant government ministries, etc). The story has to be within their jurisdiction.
  • Experts (experts are expected to give methodical evaluations without personal opinions). 
  • NGOs or semi-governmental organisations (unions, civil society organisations, rights organisations etc). 
  • Raw data (reports, studies, statistics). 
  • User-generated content.

Verifying information 

Some sources may give mistaken or inflammatory information. Journalists should not publish this information as fact without verification, even if they state its source clearly in the story.

Professionalism requires us to cross-reference it with other sources and present all of the information together in the story. This will encourage the public to question how accurate the information provided by a particular source is and compare it with other sources appearing in the story. 

GOSLAR, GERMANY: Supporters of the far-right "Die Rechte" political party gather to protest against the welcome policy towards foreign migrants on August 29, 2015 in Goslar, Germany. [Nigel Treblin/Getty Images]

Open-source content

The vast quantities of content made available on social media sites (“user-generated content”) are an important source of information that journalists can use in parallel with traditional sources. But despite its importance, open-source content can be fabricated and used to promote lies and rumours that may constitute hate speech. 

Journalists who use information from social media have to verify and fact-check this information. We have already mentioned a few relevant sources: the News Verification Guidebook, Finding the Truth Amongst the Fakes, and the EJC’s Verification Handbook.

The Ethical Journalism Network (EJN) suggests that journalists always ask themselves the following questions when dealing with information taken from social media:

  • Have I corroborated the origin including location, date and time of images and content that I am using? 
  • Have I confirmed that this material is the original piece of content (ie not modified or abridged)?
  • Have I verified the social media profiles to avoid use of fake information? 
  • Is the account holder known, and has it been a reliable source in the past? 
  • Have I asked direct questions of the content provider to verify the provenance of the information? 
  • Are there similar posts or content elsewhere online?

For example, a clip from a video of a Friday sermon given at a Saudi mosque in January 2014, in which the speaker asks non-Saudis not to attend prayers, was shared widely on social media. The clip implied that the preacher was discriminating against non-Saudis. In this case, journalists should have watched the whole video, which shows that the clip was taken out of context and that the preacher was in fact criticising racism by acting out an example.

A clip from a video of a Friday sermon given at a Saudi mosque in January 2014. The title states: "Only for Saudis." A trimmed one-minute clip was shared widely on social media. The clip implied that the preacher was discriminating against non-Saudis but the full video shows that the clip was taken out of context and that the preacher was in fact criticising racism by acting out an example.

Important questions to ask yourself

  • Why should I cover this story? Summarise each reason then evaluate it according to its importance to the public as compared to other stories you could cover. 
  • How is this story expected to benefit the public? 
  • What aspects of the story are absent from the media? Try to find a new approach to the story. 
  • What is the worst way the story could possibly be produced? Think of an unprofessional and unobjective way the story could be approached. Why would it be unprofessional and unobjective? Analyse in order to avoid. 
  • What is the ideal way to cover the story? Think about the best form the story could possibly take, even if it would be difficult for you to achieve in reality because of limitations. Try to come as close to it as possible. 
  • What are the sources I should use to achieve balance in the story? 
  • Have I conducted enough research and informed myself sufficiently about the various aspects of the story, allowing me to understand all of its different dimensions? 
  • Have I considered the sources’ individual circumstances and peculiarities? Try to understand their circumstances in order to ask them appropriate questions while respecting the specific nature of every case. 

See our guidebook on covering refugee stories.

Avoid hate speech 3
Members of the media are seen in Cellardyke Harbour on April 6, 2006 in Cellardyke, Scotland. [Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images]

Step 2: Producing the story 

Always make sure you ask questions appropriate to each source or side. When interviewing or following up authoritative personal accounts that may have a real influence, think about whether these statements constitute incitement or discrimination or encourage hatred or violence. 

Only use them if there is a clear editorial justification, and make sure you contextualise them and include responses from other affected parties. Do not produce your piece from behind a desk. Go down to the scene of the events to see what is going on for yourself. Do not rely only on your sources’ accounts. 

Look at existing news pieces on the topic you want to write about. Work out what aspects of the story have been ignored or given incomplete or unprofessional coverage, and try to draw them out in your own story. Make sure to evaluate content, whether statements, pictures or video clips. Think about the possible consequences of using it. Make sure that you understand the local society and the cultural, social and religious context. 

Important questions to ask yourself

  • Have I informed sources of the nature of the story? Have they given their consent to be quoted or to appear?
  • Have I been balanced in the sources that I have chosen? Have I given them the right to comment on information concerning them?
  • Were the questions I prepared appropriate to the topic? If the answer is “no”, then come up with more relevant questions and return to the sources. 
  • Did I obtain the information in the story from a range of different sources? Some sources may give you incorrect information or figures in order to serve a particular agenda. Try and cross-reference information as much as possible.

Avoid hate speech 4
ZAATARI, JORDAN: Refugee children surround a journalist at the Zaatari camp for Syrian refugees on January 28, 2018 in Zaatari, Jordan. [Salah Malkawi/ Getty Images]

Step 3: Writing the story 

Having completed steps one and two and started writing your story, you should arrange the different narratives by importance, ensuring an equal distribution of opinions. In some cases the opinion of one party will be based on inaccurate information, and may constitute a kind of incitement against a particular individual or group. Here it is the journalist’s role to respond to these inaccuracies by providing correct information.

Advice for writing an objective story

  • Avoid generalisations and language implying value judgements or stereotyping communities or individuals. 
  • Do not treat information given in official or unofficial reports as unquestioned fact (for journalists, any report should simply be one source among many)
  • Do not draw personal conclusions in your story. 
  • Put your expectations to one side, and avoid stereotypes and prejudices. 
  • Make sure you use objective and value-free language. 
  • Provide minorities with a voice equal to that of the majority. 

Balance information gathered from sources and divide it across the themes of the story without giving one side a louder voice. Some media outlets adopt the perspective of one party, provide no space for those with dissenting opinions to lay out their own position and do not consult experts in order to verify the information given by sources. 

Make sure that the information attributed to different sources lines up with what they have said. Put quotation marks around any expressions that express a value judgement. 

Assess the sensitivity of pictures and information appearing in the story. Make sure they do not contradict professional standards or infringe on the rights of particular individuals or groups. 

Meet with editors to evaluate your story if you feel that there might be an ethical dilemma in its current form, or if it contains information that may be sensitive for some members of the public. 

Avoid hate speech 5
KUZNICE, POLAND: A television journalist reports from a police checkpoint on a road leading to the border to Belarus on November 15, 2021 near Kuznice, Poland, where a migrant crisis has mounted in recent months. [Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images]

Important questions to ask yourself

  • Have I formulated the story objectively? Have I presented different sources’ narratives faithfully?
  • Have I put quotation marks around expressions that express a value judgment and attributed them to the source? 
  • Have I given all sources’ statements similar weight in the story and provided important information from all sides?
  • Have I assessed the statements appearing in the story and the risks associated with publishing them? 
  • Have I used language that may be harmful to a particular community or described them negatively? 
  • Have I avoided any unobjective conclusions or value judgments concerning the story?
  • Have I excluded my personal opinions from the story and distanced myself equally from all parties? 
  • Have I made sure not to include any information that might harm sources or the public? In cases where journalists face the ethical dilemma of deciding which is more important, the publication of the information or the risks associated with it, go back to one of the ethical evaluation models given above.
  • Have I only included important information in my story? Not everything sources say is actually important. Make sure you only include information relevant to the story and its context.
  • Have I only included information that sources have given me permission to use in the story?
  • Have I protected the anonymity of sources who have asked me to do so?

Avoid hate speech 3
Egyptian protesters are pictured on a tablet device during a protest in Tahrir Square in Cairo October 11, 2012. [REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh]

Step four: Ethical evaluation of the story 

Sticking to the principles of objective journalism is not enough to ensure that a journalist does not accidentally engage in discrimination in a story. He or she has ethical responsibilities that must be carefully considered before deciding to publish. 

Journalists often produce stories that seem to conform generally to the rules of journalistic professionalism and objectivity but whose general orientation helps to reinforce speech promoting discrimination or hatred. This might be because of the nature of the sources chosen or the language used, or because of other decisions that give one side a louder voice than others. 

Journalists may reinforce speech promoting discrimination or hatred without meaning to or without realising the consequences of this speech and its effects on the reader. 

A group of European journalists’ associations in Europe called The Ethical Journalism Initiative has made a number of general recommendations relevant to this topic. 

These recommendations are summarised in a list of questions that journalists can ask themselves to help ensure diversity in their stories:

  • What are my own personal assumptions about the people I am reporting on?
  • Am I open to accepting ideas for stories that go beyond my own cultural standpoint?
  • Have I any prejudicial attitude to the issue that might negatively affect the subject of the story? 
  • Are any references to colour, race, or physical appearance in the story relevant to the topic?
  • Have I used correct terminology to describe individuals and their culture?
  • Have I discussed the topic with experienced colleagues familiar with the subject?
  • Have I used different opinions and sources in the story, including those of minorities?
  • Does the story simply follow prevailing attitudes? Have I questioned these attitudes?
  • Have I made sure that the story does not reflect stereotypes?
  • Have I directly considered the needs of those involved in the story?
  • Have I taken into account the effect of the story or the images used on the lives of others?

Journalists document a group of migrants packed tightly onto a small inflatable boat attempting to cross the English Channel near the Dover Strait, the world's busiest shipping lane in September 2020. [Photo by Luke Dray/Getty Images]


Models for ethical evaluation 

There are various different models that can help journalists to make ethical decisions using moral reasoning. Journalists can apply these models to news stories in order to make sure that they are both ethical and professional: 

The SAD formula (situational definition, analysis, decision) 

This model can be subdivided into three stages: 

Situational definition 
  • Describe the facts appearing in the story.
  • Establish the conflicting values and principles in the story – for example, conflicting figures for the same topic or conflicting values.
  • Try to formulate a single ethical question that sums up the ethical dilemma presented by the story.
  • Try to create a discussion with your colleagues concerning the conflicting facts and values within the story.
  • Take account of external factors that might affect the story.
  • Look at what your organisation normally does in similar cases or make use of similar experiences.
  • Establish the parties affected by this ethical decision (you, your colleagues, your sources, society, etc).
  • Take into consideration your own emotional attitude to the decision as opposed to your rational attitude. 
  • Make a final decision.
  • Justify that decision logically in response to possible criticisms.

THE HAGUE, NETHERLANDS: A Serbian journalist interviews a supporter of war criminal Ratko Mladic outside the United Nations of International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals building on June 8, 2021 in The Hague, Netherlands. the appeal of former Bosnian Serb military leader Ratko Mladic, sentenced to life for genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during the 1992 Bosnian war to 1995 was being heard. (Photo by Pierre Crom/Getty Images)

The Dilemma Method 

This model is based on the creation of a dialogue within the newsroom. A journalist dealing with an ethical dilemma concerning an aspect of a story works with his or her colleagues to produce a consensus decision: 

  1. Introduction: A general introduction is given to familiarise the journalists with the ethical sensitivity of the story and demonstrate the importance of the decision they are going to make. 
  2. Presenting the issue: The journalist presents the facts that he or she has collected (facts only, with no influence from his or her opinion). 
  3. Formulating the ethical question and defining the dilemma: The ethical question that the journalist who has prepared the story wants colleagues to help him or her to answer is laid out in the following form: “Should I [first suggestion], [second suggestion] or [third suggestion]…?” 
  4. Brainstorming: The journalists ask questions about the story and its different aspects and then discuss some general questions, citing previous experiences and similar stories. 
  5. Analysing the dilemma: We begin to analyse the dilemma by comparing it with professional and societal values, the possible response on publication and the parties that may be harmed by each suggestion. 
  6. Beginning to search for alternatives: Here the journalist asks colleagues to think about alternatives to the suggestions he or she initially presented. 
  7. Individual decisions by each journalist: Colleagues submit their individual decisions using pen and paper by answering as follows: a) I believe that the best decision is to (one of the suggestions), because (giving a professional justification of the decision). b) Although this choice may lead to (the potential negative effects), c) this can be avoided by… d) And so (the decision he or she has chosen) is the ethical option that should be taken, given… (professional justifications). 
  8. Opening up discussion: The answers are then collected and colleagues discuss them, with the aim of expanding discussion points in order to look at all aspects of the dilemma and weigh them up against one another in order to reach a consensus decision. 
  9. Summarising conclusions: At the end of the discussion, the team takes a single ethical decision by majority vote. 
  10. Assessing the dilemma: After an ethical decision is made and the story is published in a particular form, the effects of the decision are assessed (positives and negatives) in order to benefit from the experience.

STEPANAKERT, NAGORNO-KARABAKH: Journalists take pictures and video of a crater left by a bomb that fell outside a fire station on October 2, 2020 in Stepanakert, Nagorno-Karabakh. A decades-old conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan has reignited in the disputed region of Nagorno-Karabakh, recognized by most countries as part of Azerbaijan, but controlled by ethnic Armenians since a 1994 ceasefire. [Brendan Hoffman/Getty Images]

Important questions to ask yourself

  • If you can’t answer a question decisively, go back to the ethical evaluation methods.
  • What are the possible risks associated with publishing the story? What are the possible benefits?
  • Do I have sufficient professional justification to publish the story? Can I avoid any possible risk?
  • Was serving the public interest my only criterion in assessing the story? If not, what were my other criteria, and did this affect the balance of the story?
  • What is the worst that could happen if this story is published? What is the best that could happen? List the possible negative and then the possible positive outcomes of publishing the story. Try and find ways to forestall the negatives as much as possible. 
  • Will this story lead the target demographic to feel hatred towards a person or group on the basis of their identity?
  • Will the general context in which the story or the headline is being published lead to the creation of an atmosphere of hatred or discrimination towards a given person or group of people on the basis of their identity?
  • Does the story stereotype or misrepresent a person or group based on their identity





An earlier version of this article first appeared in the AJMI publication, Avoiding Discrimination and Hate Speech in Media


More Articles

Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Blackout on Imran Khan and PTI: Analysing Pakistan's Election Press Restrictions

Implications and response to media censorship and the deliberate absence of coverage for the popular former Prime Minister, Imran Khan, and his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), in the media during the 2024 elections in Pakistan.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 14 Feb, 2024
Digital Battlegrounds: The New Broadcasting Bill and Independent Journalism in India

New legislation in India threatens the freedom of independent journalism. The draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023 grants the government extensive power to regulate and censor content, potentially suppressing news critical of government policies.

Safina Nabi Published on: 11 Feb, 2024
Pegasus Spyware: A Grave Threat to Journalists in Southeast Asia

The widespread deployment of spyware such as Pegasus in Southeast Asia, used by governments to target opposition leaders, activists, and journalists, presents significant challenges in countering digital surveillance. This is due to its clandestine operations and the political intricacies involved. The situation underscores the urgent need for international cooperation and heightened public awareness to address these human rights infringements.

AJR Contributor Published on: 5 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
Monitoring of Journalistic Malpractices in Gaza Coverage

On this page, the editorial team of the Al Jazeera Journalism Review will collect news published by media institutions about the current war on Gaza that involves disinformation, bias, or professional journalistic standards and its code of ethics.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 30 Jan, 2024
Cameroonian Media Martyrs: The Intersection of Journalism and Activism

Experts and journalists in Cameroon disagree on the relationship between journalism and activism: some say journalism is activism; others think they are worlds apart, while another category says a “very thin” line separate both

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 28 Jan, 2024
Silent Suffering: The Impact of Sexual Harassment on African Newsrooms

Sexual harassment within newsrooms and the broader journalistic ecosystem is affecting the quality and integrity of journalistic work, ultimately impacting the organisation’s integrity and revenue.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 23 Jan, 2024
In the Courtroom and Beyond: Covering South Africa's Historic Legal Case Against Israel at The Hague

As South Africa takes on Israel at the International Court of Justice, the role of journalists in covering this landmark case becomes more crucial than ever. Their insights and reporting bring the complexities of international law to a global audience.

Hala Ahed
Hala Ahed Published on: 12 Jan, 2024
Embedded journalism: Striking a balance between access and impartiality in war zones

The ethical implications of embedded journalism, particularly in the Israeli invasion of Gaza, raise concerns about the compromise of balance and independence in war coverage.

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 19 Dec, 2023
Does international law protect Palestinian journalists?

International humanitarian law provides some protection for journalists, but there is a lack of effective measures against crimes committed against them. The Israeli occupation's impunity and lack of accountability for war crimes against civilians, including journalists, is a crisis for international law.

Badia Al-Sawan
Badia Al-Sawan Published on: 12 Dec, 2023
Through a Mexican lens: Navigating the intricacies of reporting in Palestine

A Mexican journalist's journey through the complexities of reporting on Palestine and gives tips on how to manage this kind of coverage.

Témoris Grecko
Témoris Grecko Published on: 10 Dec, 2023
This Indian fact-checking newsroom is at the forefront of the fight against disinformation on the war in Gaza

In the digital battleground of Gaza's war, a surge of disinformation, primarily from Indian Hindu nationalists, paints Palestinians negatively, fueled by Islamophobia and pro-Israeli sentiments; yet, Alt News emerges as a crucial counterforce, diligently fact-checking and debunking these misleading narratives, even in Arabic, amidst a sea of manipulated social media content.

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 5 Dec, 2023
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Why have opposition parties in India issued a boycott of 14 TV presenters?

Media workers in India argue that boycotts of individual journalists are not the answer to pro-Government reporting bias

Saurabh Sharma
Saurabh Sharma Published on: 23 Oct, 2023
Punishing the popular: the suspension of a youth magazine in Vietnam

Media outlets not directly affiliated with the state are not allowed to produce ‘news’ in Vietnam - but the loose definition of ‘news’ means many fall foul of the rules

AJR Correspondent Published on: 19 Oct, 2023
When journalism and artificial intelligence come face to face

What does the future really hold for journalism and artificial intelligence?

Amira Zahra Imouloudene Published on: 12 Oct, 2023
The bombs raining down on Gaza from Israel are beyond scary, beyond crazy

REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK: As Israel bombarded Gaza for the third night, I found myself closer to a missile hit than I could have imagined

Maram Humaid Published on: 11 Oct, 2023
‘We are not going to stop doing journalism’ - reporters defiant after raids on India’s NewsClick

This week’s raid on the offices and homes of NewsClick employees is the latest in a string of attacks on independent news outlets critical of the Indian government

Saurabh Sharma
Saurabh Sharma Published on: 6 Oct, 2023
The French banlieues and their troubled relationship with the media

Discriminatory media coverage of recent unrest in the suburbs of Paris shows that little has changed since the uprisings of 2005

Ahmed Nazif Published on: 28 Sep, 2023
Why are Zimbabwe’s elections always surrounded by media controversy?

Election season in Zimbabwe has long been shrouded in controversy, with intimidation of opposition activists and journalists, combined with disorganisation at the ballots creating a perfect storm for chaos. This year was no different

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 25 Sep, 2023
Analysis: The media’s coverage of the Pakistan cable car incident

It was a roller coaster ride with news organisations all over the world giving minute-by-minute reports on the daring rescue. How does the media create suspense and is this sort of coverage useful?

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 21 Sep, 2023
How to use data to report on earthquakes

Sifting through data sounds clinical, but journalists can use it to seek out the human element when reporting on natural disasters such as earthquakes

Arwa Kooli Published on: 19 Sep, 2023