Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Hungary outside
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY - Migrants protest outside Keleti station in central Budapest after it was closed to migrants on September 1, 2015. The Hungarian government said the move was taken to 'restore order' following choatic scenes at the station. According to the Hungarian authorities a record number of migrants from many parts of the Middle East, Africa and Asia had crossed the border from Serbia earlier in the week [Matt Cardy/Getty Images]

How Hungary’s media created the ‘Muslim bogeyman’

Hungary was one of the first Soviet-controlled countries to welcome refugees in the late 1980s. These days its government is one of the most opposed to migration in Europe. We examine how the media paved the way for this turnaround

 

“This barbaric herd, which should be eliminated, raped women in Milan again. Will they stay in Europe, what do you guys think?” Mused Zsolt Bayer, a right wing commentator, and one of the founding members of Fidesz, about the fate of migrants, as he turned to one of his guests attending his roundtable Sajtoklub, a show offering commentary that appears on Hir TV, a government-friendly cable news channel in Hungary. 

“You bet they will,” smirked his guest to a chuckling Bayer, who has received one of the highest orders of merit granted by the ruling party despite calling migrants “animals”, “uncivilised”, “Jews stinking of excrement”, and even labelling the pope a “demented old geezer, or a villain” for condemning Hungary’s treatment of refugees.

Hungary Pope
Headline describing Zsolt Bayer's attack on the Pope

“Statements regarding refugees that would have shocked the nation now seem common and hardly cause an uproar,” says Szabolcs Panyi, who is an investigative journalist at the independent digital site, Direkt36.hu. “Hungarian politics have moved to the far right over the years and the media, strategically harnessed by the government, have followed suit.”

Hungary’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orban and his Fidesz-led government - in power for 12 consecutive years with four more to come and a two-thirds majority in Parliament since 2010 - have worked hard over the years to control the media. By autumn of 2018, they had founded KESMA (the Central European Press and Media Foundation, Közép-Európai Sajtó és Média Alapítvány), the government-friendly media conglomerate that has absorbed more than 500 regional and national outlets which, along with taxpayer-funded national TV and radio and other non-KESMA but government-affiliated independent outlets, hands the authorities a more-than 80 percent monopoly over the nation’s news stream.

Hungary collage 1
A selection of Hungarian headlines depicting migrants as 'demons' and 'terrorists'

“These media outlets get a daily wire from the powers-that-be about the most essential talking points that they are expected to regurgitate,” says Panyi who has expressed concern about the most recent changes in the ruling party’s top positions: The  “propaganda minister”, Antal Rogan, who approves the state-friendly media’s daily talking points, now also oversees the secret service. “The alternative reality stream effectively shapes the nation’s consciousness, while the room left for independent journalism to fact-check and contest misleading statements is shrinking.”

Hungary headline 1
A headline from the blog of anti-immigrant Zsolt Bayer: "Let's put it out there: Past 14, all of them are potential killers."
Hungary headline 2
Another media headline states: "Migrant wanted to infect policeman with AIDS"

 

Avoiding 'another Simicska'

KESMA is overseen by Mediaworks - one of its largest media acquisitions - which previously belonged to businessman Lorinc Meszaros, Orban’s childhood friend and a former pipe fitter who has become one of the wealthiest men in Hungary. Over the past year, the pro-government conglomerate has received about one hundred billion HUFs (around $35 million). Besides the news, it engages in various services such as advertising, ticket and property sales via its websites and has bypassed Hungary’s competition act as it is identified as a “special national economic project” that “serves the public good”.

“With KESMA, the government wanted to make sure that the Simicska-style story does not happen again,” says director of the independent news outlet, 444.hu, Peter Erdelyi about one of the oldest and most faithful allies of Orban, the co-founder and the “business mind” of Fidesz, Lajos Simicska, who publicly fell out with the prime minister and then instructed media outlets under his oversight to criticise the authorities. “With KESMA it meant that in the event of a feud with another owner of a government-friendly paper or TV, Orban’s messaging regarding sensitive topics such as migration, would remain on track.”

Experts now fear that the government’s latest levy on advertising revenue will suffocate the remaining strongholds of independent media that benefit from ads on their platforms.

“Some of these liberal cable companies like RTL Klub are in German hands,” says Panyi who has been targeted by the controversial Israeli spyware, Pegasus - a software which contaminates electronic devices and was initially designed to catch criminals and terrorists. “Independent outlets counter the propaganda, discuss the misleading campaigns against migration, or whatever the authorities are identifying as evil, but if they fall short of revenue, they would likely be sold by their owners to bidders ready to serve government interests.”

Hungary 2
Hungary's decision in September 2015 to fence off its borders with Croatia and Serbia, following a media campaign demonising migrants, caused chaos in Croatia, where refugees were waiting to try to reach northern Europe [Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images]

 

‘Curating reality’

Bernadett Szel, a former MP, says that Orban made it clear in the 1990s that whoever controlled the media would have command over the country. However, she says, the pressing need to “curate reality” emerged with the 2015 Syrian migration crisis.

“The sympathetic voices needed to be rooted out,” Szel says. “They knew that migration was a topic around which they could rally supporters, so they masterfully twisted reality with the help of the media.”

She remembers that in 2015 - like now, with the Ukrainian crisis unfolding next door - Hungarian volunteers and people were helpful and enthusiastic about providing assistance to refugees stuck at the train stations in Budapest. Thus, at first, it was a long shot for the authorities to ignite anti-immigrant sentiment across the nation. The government, in her opinion, ignored the needs of thousands of migrants to sow chaos in public spaces, since people in desperation were more likely to cause havoc. 

Hungary banner 1
Advertising propaganda states: "If you come to Hungary, you cannot take away Hungarians' jobs." Written in Hungarian, critics say these messages are not directed at refugees themselves, but are designed to stoke up hatred towards migrants

“Then the government installed these propaganda banners everywhere which read in Hungarian that ‘if you come to Hungary you must learn our language’,” says Szel, stressing that these messages were not for the refugees who spoke no Hungarian but to inflame fellow citizens about the “intruders”. “Families, women and children were all visible, so the authorities’ disinformation campaign was not hitting home, just yet.”

Leaked state media documents also revealed that later, taxpayer-funded state TV channels were forbidden from showing images of refugee women and children. 

In a 2021 documentary, titled Five Lessons about Doing away with Reality a former state television employee, Krisztina Balogh also said that the news she had to produce often communicated made-up content about migrants, and on one occasion she had to find a doctor for her broadcast segment to corroborate the false statement that migrants carried diseases.

“I could not find anyone here in Budapest,” she said. “But the editorial team identified an individual in the countryside who was willing to repeat word-to-word what my editor wanted to have in the report.”

Hungary banner 2
Another propaganda advertisement states: "If you come to Hungary, you must respect our laws!" 

 

‘Painting an apocalypse’

Szel says that the government had it easier with its fear mongering propaganda once, in the fall of 2015, the highly controversial fence was installed along the country’s southern border first between Hungary and Serbia, then between Hungary and Croatia.

“Then there was the EU’s quota system for member states to accept a number of Syrian refugees,” says Szel about the 2015 ruling which would have meant that Hungary admit about two thousand people over a period of two years, but the government vehemently opposed the ruling and even organised a referendum, which albeit invalid served as a catalyst for the authorities’ anti-migrant laws.

“In fact hardly any refugees wanted to stay here,” Szel says. “But this did not matter, as the authorities painted the migrant influx in apocalyptic terms.”

Hungary headline 3
A headline states: "Soros lackeys would spend [EU] development funds on migrants"
Hungary headline 4
A right-wing commentary states: "If Soros-affiliate organisation traffics migrants across the border then it isn't punishable by the [European] Union's court"
Hungary headline 5
An excerpt from a newspaper article states: "Greek authorities are busy whisking the savages into a stadium, since no other solution remains - everything is full of savages"

By the end of 2015 there were nearly 400,000 Syrian refugees who crossed into Hungary - a country of 10 million - out of whom 177,135 were registered for asylum, but only a handful - a bit over 500 - obtained their papers as most of the petitioners did not qualify. Many waited for the issuance of these documents and moved on to Germany, Austria and wealthier Scandinavian nations. Despite the low number of refugees intending to stay, the crisis presented an opportunity for the authorities to posit the non-European “other” as an existential threat against whom they could unite the nation, tighten asylum laws and justify their need to hold onto the reins of power.

“To a rural person who has never seen anybody who looked different and had a different religion, the migrant person embodied all their imaginary fears,” says Erdelyi. “With this in mind the authorities deployed tactics to incite fear across the nation with the help of their media, no pun intended, but such moves would be unimaginable with people who are our neighbours and look like us, and have similar cultural and historical heritage.”

Over the past few years, government-friendly TV and radio has served up commentary that highlights that migrants are dangerous. The narrative is that they want to come here to “reproduce” and “replace locals”, and take advantage of Hungary’s economic safety. One far-right commentator, Zsolt Tyirityan even said that migrants were so uncivilised that they did not even know how to use toilet paper.

Hungary headline 6
On the taxpayer-funded TV channel, M1, an analyst discusses the 'siege' at Roske on the Hungary-Serbia border, claiming that migrants are carrying 'leprosy', on September 16, 2021 [YouTube]

 

Demonising migrants

“Stereotyping comments give leeway to unnecessary paranoia and violence,” says Erdelyi. “There were many incidents over the years that indicate the escalation of this trend.”

When a lady went to her local hairdresser, and put on a scarf upon leaving the salon - to protect her freshly coiffed hair from a light drizzle - a village resident alerted the police that “there was a migrant” on the loose. 

Then there was another incident when three Sri-Lankan college students, who were just about a day in Hungary decided to volunteer at a hospice, again only to be detained by the police as locals reported them. 

Perhaps one of the most well-known cases involves a man who offered Migration Aid help with accommodating a few refugee families at his holiday let, but his village neighbours got so worked up over his plans that they threatened him and punctured his car tires as a warning, which ultimately culminated in the man withdrawing his offer.

Hungary 12
Government billboards vilifying immigrants have been defaced by opposition activists in Budapest, Hungary, June 10, 2015 [Bernadett Szabo/Reuters]

As Russian missiles obliterate much of Ukraine’s infrastructure next door, Hungary’s state-funded media have commented on the difference between the Middle-Eastern “migrant” banging on the southern border and the Ukrainian “refugee”. Accordingly, the former individual wants to come to Hungary to cause trouble while the latter is seen as a genuinely wronged person, fleeing the atrocities of the war.

Conversely, since Russia attacked Ukraine, Hungarian state media have failed to blame Vladimir Putin, Russia’s leader and Orban’s faithful ally for the unfolding calamities. When Orban was asked by reporters at a press conference to offer an opinion about the Bucha massacre - which involved blindfolded Ukrainian civilians with their hands tied in the back and shot in the head littering the road -  the Hungarian prime minister said he didn’t see the images so could not offer a comment. The authorities’ unwillingness to point at Putin’s wrongdoing has sparked the spread of Russian propaganda across government controlled and friendly media as well, with most outlets saying that Zelensky was a clown, war images’ authenticity was dubious, and some commentators like Zsolt Bayer suggesting that the gruesome photos of the war were staged by Ukrainians and the West.

Hungary 16
Hungarian right-wing pundit Zsolt Bayer speaks during an event called the 'Hungarian Deplorables for Trump' that marked the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States at Szabadsag (Liberty) Square in downtown Budapest, Hungary, on January 20, 2017 [Zsolt Szigetvary/EPA]

“Orban on one hand boasts that Hungary has aided and welcomed many refugees on the other rubs shoulders with Putin,” says Panyi. “But in essence the refugees are not welcome, the dynamic is not the same as in 2015, but there is animosity building up.”

So far over nearly 2 million refugees have come to Hungary since the war in Ukraine began, and numbers are likely to rise as the fighting continues, though most of those who are displaced and enter the country, like in 2015, almost immediately leave for Western nations.

Now critics say that the Hungarian authorities deliberately inflate the number of Ukrainian refugees staying in Hungary to receive EU funds, but many fear that the money will be spent elsewhere, since Hungary is facing a steep budget deficit, partly due to the EU’s decision to withhold Hungary’s pandemic aid over its asylum policy.  

Hungary 9
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán speaks to supporters after the announcement of the partial results in the parliamentary election on April 3, 2022 in Budapest, Hungary. Critics say that Hungary under Orbán has chipped away at democratic norms [Janos Kummer/Getty Images]

 

‘Truth is, no refugee wants to stay here’

The controversial Soros package of bills - dubbed after the Hungarian-American financier George Soros - came into force in 2018 following the Syrian migrant crisis and makes it hard for refugees to obtain asylum and prevents them from applying for legal protections if they “flee from countries where their lives are not deemed at risk”, moreover, the bill has a clause that accuses billionaire financier George Soros and affiliated NGOs of “aiding and abetting illegal migration” in Hungary, thus criminalises people or organisations who help illegal refugees claim asylum. 

“Truth is, no refugee wants to stay here,” says Panyi. Since the war erupted he has hosted a Ukrainian mother and her son who receive about 80 euros per month in refugee aid. “Since 2015 the government deliberately let the asylum system collapse, there is no structure to welcome, to aid refugees or promote their assimilation.”

Hungary 10


Hungary launches a media campaign targeting the EU And Soros on February 22, 2019: A billboard with portraits of Jean-Claude Juncker and Hungarian-born US billionaire George Soros shows a slogan reading: "You too have a right to know what Brussels is preparing" [Laszlo Balogh/Getty images]

Hungary hasn’t always been so anti-immigrant. In March 1989, prior to the fall of the Berlin wall, Hungary was one of the first countries in the USSR-controlled Eastern Block to join the 1951 Geneva Convention and adopt the required legal guidance and international help to provide comprehensive support and shelter to about 20,000 ethnic Hungarians fleeing Ceausescu’s regime and a few years later to give hospitality to many during the Yugoslav wars. 

But, by the mid 2000s, the sobering reality of a slower-than-expected move to adopt Western policies along with economic uncertainty brought about a rising animosity toward asylum seekers further exacerbated by the 2008 financial meltdown. Experts say that the watershed moment for the government’s anti-migrant stance came on the heels of the 2015 Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris, when radicalised Muslim freedom fighters attacked a satirical paper’s staff, killing many. Shortly after the unfortunate incident the Syrian refugee crisis hit the European Union.

Peter Horvath*, who works for the government’s migration research institute and wishes to use an alias for fear of reprisals, says that the handling of the migrant crisis was something of a “political stunt” as the government conflated migration with terrorism and crime.

“The opposition forces were too weak in the parliament,” Horvath says. “And the government needed something or someone against whom they could portray themselves as the saviours of national cohesion, so migrants became their focus.”

Hungary 13
Employees of the right-wing Hungarian news television channel, Hir TV, enter the headquarters in Budapest, Hungary, on August 1, 2018 [Bernadett Szabo/Reuters]

Horvath is convinced that the government’s treatment and the media coverage of Syrian migrants had nothing to do with their faith.

Szel however disagrees. 

“The Christian conservative narrative became suddenly prominent, so migrants were targeted and singled out as the bogeymen,” says Szel. She thinks that what matters is one’s behaviour, not where you are from. “Look at us, we are also diverse, we are also changing as a nation, there are many people with different origins living on my street and we get on very well.”

Szel says the government always needs something or someone to fight against.

“May this be this feared migrants, Soros, Brussels or the LGBTQ community,” she says. “The enemy keeps rotating as per the authorities’ behest.”

 

Building the ‘enemy’ trope

Orban’s obsession with building his political messaging around an enemy started as early as 2008, when he prepared to run for office for the second time. He sought counsel from the conservative political strategist the late Arthur Finkelstein who had successfully advised many Republican, conservative politicians in the United States including president Richard Nixon. 

Finkelstein’s partner, George Birnbaum, said that they had advised Orban to draw on the fact that Hungary had been homogeneous, sealed off from the world because of the Iron Curtain, so most of the population had never met people of colour, or of different religions, which presented an opportunity to exploit. 

Soros 1
A billboard depicting George Soros states: "Let's not allow Soros to have the last laugh" [Getty Images]

They reasoned that these differences could potentially be used to heighten a sense of nationalism, and the need for a strong government and a charismatic leader.

A 2006/2007 survey also revealed that there was a growing animosity towards people of different origins as citizens were asked to fill out a questionnaire listing six refugee ethnic groups who came to Hungary, including one bogus one, the “pirez”, to highlight which one they found the most threatening. The results indicated that people felt the most apprehensive about Muslims followed by people with Chinese origin.

As for the enemy trope, in 2010, Orban won his second mandate with a focus on the evil of the previous government, and Western capitalism that had caused the financial meltdown. Four years later, in 2014  Brussels loomed as the corrupting force that wanted to bend Hungary to its will, and in 2015 a new opportunity presented itself in the form of the migrant “other” from Syria - the ultimate “personae non grata” - that in 2018 catapulted Fidesz to yet another parliamentary win. 

“This political move to deploy an enemy was already there,” says Erdelyi who says Finkelstein’s strategy wasn’t a radically new idea for Hungarian politics. “It was easy to manipulate rural voters who feared that their way of life was going to be threatened, their jobs taken, what they knew, eliminated. This is what Orban’s team tapped into, even though I think on a personal level, he does not harbour anti-Muslim feelings himself.”

Erdelyi has worked with the investigative group Direkt36 which revealed how Hungary’s dubious residency bond scheme offered permanent residency status to non-European citizens for 250,000-300,000 euros with a five-year maturity date. 

Hungary Soros
A propaganda billboard message reads: "Soros would populate Hungary with [migrants] from the Middle East and Africa"

After the five years were up, investors received their funds back, and could keep their residency papers. This way, many controversial figures from Russia, Asia or the Middle East could obtain Hungarian citizenship and with it unrestricted access to the rest of the European Union. Some of the most notable figures who took part in this scheme included the Syrian strongman Bashar al Assad’s money man, Atiya Khoury, who has been sanctioned by the United States for human rights violations. 

“You see all these friendships and political alliances with the Middle East, Turkey being a good example,” Erdelyi says. “So I would be careful to say that there is some kind of innate bias towards Muslims. It is, however, a propaganda trick that has worked out very well.”

 

‘Europe is Hellas, not Persia’

Erdelyi says what the government has managed to do was to start a communication in the media about the migrant person, and what truly mattered was to launch an ongoing debate, whether good or bad, as this benefited the powers-that-be. This way public attention got diverted from other pressing problems such as corruption and other unsavoury state party scandals. 

Over the years, Orban successfully deployed the Muslim migrant trope to argue that Islam and its heritage are incongruous with Hungary’s Christian values. He once said that “Europe is Hellas, not Persia. It is Rome, it is Christianity, not a Caliphate.” Orban also conflates Islam with terrorism, as state-funded media zeroes in on some of the extremist attacks across Europe reiterating that migration brings violence, crime and would mean the demise of Hungary, and the decline of the European Union. In 2021 when Bosnia expressed its desire to ascend to the EU, Orban said that it would be a challenge “to integrate a country with two million Muslims,” because of the cultural differences.

In the summer of 2022 Orban also said a very controversial speech in Tusvanyos, Romania at a convention where his sympathisers gathered for an intellectual workshop and festivities celebrating nationalism and patriotism - this is where he said that “Europe was now split in two because of migration,” and those in Western Europe “mixed with other-non European people'' and concluded that “Hungarians don’t want to become mixed-race”, since that would be the end of Hungary as a nation. Orban’s comments caused worldwide uproar, with many critics saying that his words echoed Goebbel’s Nazi playbook. The government's spokesperson Zoltan Kovacs who was live tweeting the event in English deliberately omitted the prime minister’s fascistic thoughts.

Hungary 7
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: Police remove a protester on Szechenyi Chain Bridge after a demonstration against legislative measures introduced by Prime Minister Viktor Orban, on January 19, 2019 [Chris McGrath/Getty Images]

Experts say, however, that no migrants want to settle down in Hungary, and only intend to pass through, so the government’s fear-mongering is not warranted.

Justin Spike, who is AP’s Hungary correspondent, has covered the migration beat extensively and says that migrants are bewildered by the government’s portrayal of them.

“Refugees I talked to are afraid to come to Hungary,” Spike says. ”When the prime minister, the state media channels, and state friendly outlets parrot in tandem that migrants are not welcome, as a refugee you certainly don’t feel comfortable here.”

Spike covered the Afghan refugee crisis following America’s withdrawal from the region that once again triggered a new wave of migrants headed for Europe, albeit in much smaller numbers. However the event provided fodder for the authorities. As the 2022 parliamentary election approached, Orban’s campaign among many other elements focused on the trope of the “unruly migrant” and a potential “migrant influx” if the opposition was to be elected. 

To back their points, state media pundits reiterated the amount of border entry attempts recorded along the southern border.

Hungary 1
TOVARNIK, CROATIA - Hundreds of migrants wait for a train to Zagreb on their journey north despite moves by Slovenia and Hungary to hold them back on September 19, 2015 [Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images]

Spike, however, conducted an investigation into the government’s claim and used the European Union’s border agency, Frontex’s data, to reveal that the numbers were inflated. 

“Many refugees made countless attempts to enter, to no avail,” he says. “The bottom line is, refugees do not want to stay here, because there is hostility toward them and also it is very difficult to obtain papers.”

 

'Migrants equal terrorism'

To be considered for asylum, petitioners must file a letter of intent at the embassy of a neighbouring non-EU country that is either in Ukraine or Serbia, wait 60 days for the authorities’ response, then if approved, enter Hungary and avail themselves to a border guard or officer to start the official asylum process.

This system has been in effect since the summer of 2020, following the closure of the highly controversial ‘transit zones’ aka the razor wire-lined mobile containers that served from the fall of 2015 as the official areas for asylum procedures until the spring of 2020 when the European Court of Justice deemed them unlawful. The ruling said these zones were effectively prisons, because anyone who entered them became detained, could not leave and had to wait sometimes up to two years without being granted asylum.

“I don’t think that our policies are any different compared to other EU members,” says Horvath, who monitors migration trends and policy for the government. “If you look around, many countries have restricted migration, it’s not only us.”

But experts such as Dr Marta Pardavi, the head of the Helsinki Committee in Hungary, disagrees.

“We are completely going against EU legislation,” Pardavi says. “In fact there is basically hardly any asylum policy in Hungary right now. The country cannot even explain how it grants asylum to those whom it wants to save.”

Pardavi says that the Hungarian government has extensively experimented with suspending EU laws via its ‘migration emergency law’ that has renewed every six month since 2016. 

Hungary 3
OPATOVAC, CROATIA - Migrants take a bus straight to the Hungarian border from a refugee camp as more migrants arrive from the Serbian border on September 22, 2015 [David Ramos/Getty Images]

“There is the practice of pushbacks,” says Pardavi. “This clearly goes against EU rules and the Geneva Convention because instead of honouring the refugees' desire for asylum on the spot they are pushed back over the border into Serbia.”

The International Commission of Jurists called the measure an unhinged abuse of emergency powers, since it grants draconian authority to those policing the border. The measure also bypasses the judiciary, the parliament and by proxy defies EU rules. It also allows the government to funnel as much money as it wants for border protection services.

“Meanwhile authorities succeeded in communicating that Islam equals migrants, and migrants equal terrorism,” says Pardavi, whose team has sued Hungary multiple times on behalf of refugees for human rights violations. “Migrant, as a word, had a neutral meaning before, but became sullied over the years.”

Peter Szijjarto, Hungary’s foreign minister, also made a comparison between “migrants” and “refugees” and said that Ukrainian asylum seekers were patient and disciplined, while “illegal” migrants along the southern border were unruly and behaved “aggressively…damaging infrastructure” and “attacked the police”. Szijjarto said that anyone was welcome to come to Hungary from Ukraine, including people from third countries, provided they had their papers in order.

Hungary headline 7
In 2018, Index (before it was sold to a Fidesz-friendly investor) did an analysis of the far-right digital site, Origo’s daily coverage. Headlines highlighted in red, anti-clockwise from upper left corner: “Migrants flooded Vienna’s downtown”; “Confirmed: Afghan migrant knifed four in Vienna; “A migrant robs 92-year old lady in England”; ”Gyula Molnar wants to build Islamic centre in Ujbuda”

He reiterated Orban’s words that Hungary was not going to relinquish its immigration laws despite the 2021 EU court ruling that struck down the Stop-Soros package of bills. He said that no ‘illegal’ migrants from other countries would be allowed to sneak in with the “flock of refugees” fleeing the war in Ukraine.

“If a person utters so much as ‘asylum’, it means that they need assistance right away,” says Erno Simon, communication director for UNHCR’s Hungary branch (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). His team works closely with Pardavi. He says they are relieved by the EU’s decision on Hungary's asylum laws, even if Hungary has pledged to keep to its immigration policy. Simon says his team remains determined to help refugees regardless of the legal odds.

“Anyone fleeing any war needs immediate shelter and help,” Simon says. “Yet the authorities’ messaging insinuates that there may be some sort of difference between refugees. The fact is, a life is a life, there is no difference.”

 

More Articles

Journalism in chains in Cameroon

Investigative journalists in Cameroon sometimes use treacherous means to navigate the numerous challenges that hamper the practice of their profession: the absence of the Freedom of Information Act, the criminalisation of press offenses, and the scare of the overly-broad anti-terrorism law.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 12 Apr, 2024
The Perils of Journalism and the Rise of Citizen Media in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia's media landscape is grim, with low rankings for internet and press freedom across the region. While citizen journalism has risen to fill the gaps, journalists - both professional and citizen - face significant risks due to government crackdowns and the collusion between tech companies and authorities to enable censorship and surveillance.

AJR Contributor Published on: 6 Apr, 2024
Silenced Voices: The Battle for Free Expression Amid India’s Farmer’s Protest

The Indian government's use of legal mechanisms to suppress dissenting voices and news reports raises questions about transparency and freedom of expression. The challenges faced by independent media in India indicate a broader narrative of controlling the narrative and stifling dissenting voices.

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 17 Mar, 2024
Targeting Truth: Assault on Female Journalists in Gaza

For female journalists in Palestine, celebrating international women's rights this year must take a backseat, as they continue facing the harsh realities of conflict. March 8th will carry little celebration for them, as they grapple with the severe risks of violence, mass displacement, and the vulnerability of abandonment amidst an ongoing humanitarian crisis. Their focus remains on bearing witness to human suffering and sharing stories of resilience from the frontlines, despite the personal dangers involved in their work.

Fatima Bashir
Fatima Bashir Published on: 14 Mar, 2024
A Woman's Journey Reporting on Pakistan's Thrilling Cholistan Desert Jeep Rally

A Woman's Voice in the Desert: Navigating the Spotlight

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 8 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Blackout on Imran Khan and PTI: Analysing Pakistan's Election Press Restrictions

Implications and response to media censorship and the deliberate absence of coverage for the popular former Prime Minister, Imran Khan, and his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), in the media during the 2024 elections in Pakistan.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 14 Feb, 2024
Digital Battlegrounds: The New Broadcasting Bill and Independent Journalism in India

New legislation in India threatens the freedom of independent journalism. The draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023 grants the government extensive power to regulate and censor content, potentially suppressing news critical of government policies.

Safina
Safina Nabi Published on: 11 Feb, 2024
Pegasus Spyware: A Grave Threat to Journalists in Southeast Asia

The widespread deployment of spyware such as Pegasus in Southeast Asia, used by governments to target opposition leaders, activists, and journalists, presents significant challenges in countering digital surveillance. This is due to its clandestine operations and the political intricacies involved. The situation underscores the urgent need for international cooperation and heightened public awareness to address these human rights infringements.

AJR Contributor Published on: 5 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
Cameroonian Media Martyrs: The Intersection of Journalism and Activism

Experts and journalists in Cameroon disagree on the relationship between journalism and activism: some say journalism is activism; others think they are worlds apart, while another category says a “very thin” line separate both

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 28 Jan, 2024
Silent Suffering: The Impact of Sexual Harassment on African Newsrooms

Sexual harassment within newsrooms and the broader journalistic ecosystem is affecting the quality and integrity of journalistic work, ultimately impacting the organisation’s integrity and revenue.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 23 Jan, 2024
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Why have opposition parties in India issued a boycott of 14 TV presenters?

Media workers in India argue that boycotts of individual journalists are not the answer to pro-Government reporting bias

Saurabh Sharma
Saurabh Sharma Published on: 23 Oct, 2023
The bombs raining down on Gaza from Israel are beyond scary, beyond crazy

REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK: As Israel bombarded Gaza for the third night, I found myself closer to a missile hit than I could have imagined

Maram
Maram Humaid Published on: 11 Oct, 2023
Reporter’s Notebook - what I learned from covering the Kalash people

As journalists, our fascination with Indigenous communities can blind us to our ethical obligations to respect privacy and dignity of those we document - we must reflect carefully

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 5 Oct, 2023
The French banlieues and their troubled relationship with the media

Discriminatory media coverage of recent unrest in the suburbs of Paris shows that little has changed since the uprisings of 2005

AN
Ahmed Nazif Published on: 28 Sep, 2023
Why are Zimbabwe’s elections always surrounded by media controversy?

Election season in Zimbabwe has long been shrouded in controversy, with intimidation of opposition activists and journalists, combined with disorganisation at the ballots creating a perfect storm for chaos. This year was no different

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 25 Sep, 2023
Analysis: The media’s coverage of the Pakistan cable car incident

It was a roller coaster ride with news organisations all over the world giving minute-by-minute reports on the daring rescue. How does the media create suspense and is this sort of coverage useful?

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 21 Sep, 2023
How to use data to report on earthquakes

Sifting through data sounds clinical, but journalists can use it to seek out the human element when reporting on natural disasters such as earthquakes

Arwa
Arwa Kooli Published on: 19 Sep, 2023
‘I had no idea how to report on this’ - local journalists tackling climate change stories

Local journalists are key to informing the public about the devastating dangers of climate change but, in India, a lack of knowledge, training and access to expert sources is holding them back

Saurabh Sharma
Saurabh Sharma Published on: 13 Sep, 2023