Al Jazeera Journalism Review

A picture of Palestinian journalists laying on their stomachs as Israeli snipers fire passes by them.

In coverage of Palestine, biases and irresponsible journalism emerge

As journalists, we follow a few simple rules in order to communicate as clearly as we can with our audience. 

One of the first rules we learn is to always write in the active voice, so it is evident who is doing an action, what the action is, and to whom the action is being done. Consider the following sentence: “Man kills wife and children in fit of rage.” In this sentence, we have identified the criminal, his victims, his actions and his motive for said actions.

Basic stuff. And yet for some reason, current reporting on the ongoing Israeli bombardment of Gaza and the escalating conflict between Israelis and Palestinians is willfully ignoring these basic rules. Take the following tweet from German News Outlet Deutsche Welle on May 12, 2021. 

 

A tweet from German News Outlet DW.
Source

This tweet flouts all the basic principles of a proper headline, to the detriment of the audience. 

Due to its reliance on passive voice, the reader does not know who did the action, what the action is (children having been killed is not an action, it is a consequence), or how the action happened. Further, the muddled language of the headline leads one to believe that the nine children were killed while fighting Israel—which is obviously not the case.

If we rewrite the tweet according to the proper conventions of headline-writing, it would sound more like this: “Israeli airstrikes kill nine children in Gaza Strip.” Now we know who killed the children, how they were killed, and the consequences of Israeli airstrikes. 

The strange tendency of so many reputable news outlets to suddenly write vague and misleading headlines when it comes to Israeli actions in Palestine not only points towards a bias towards the Israelis, but also misleads readers. 

For example, a Reuters headline on May 10 describing what appears to be a ramming of a crowd of Palestinian protesters by an Israeli driver completely leaves out the ramming, and the fact that a Palestinian man was struck by the vehicle. Even if the ramming was unintentional, the main event of the story, the ramming of a vehicle into a crowd of protesters, should be the focus of the headline, and should certainly not be described as a mere “crash.” Readers scanning the headlines or scrolling through social media, would have no idea that this ramming ever took place. 

A screenshot of a Reuters headline.
Source

Compare the headline to another Reuters headline describing a very similar event last year, where it appeared a Palestinian rammed his car into a police checkpoint.

A screenshot of a Reuters headline.
Source

Here the Reuters headline puts the car-ramming front and center. Though there was the same doubt present over whether or not the crash was intentional or the result of losing control of the vehicle, Reuters did not describe it as a “crash.” 

What is the difference here? One driver was Israeli and one was Palestinian. 

“Clashes” 

Already social media is inflamed with criticism over journalists’ use of “clashes” to describe the raiding of Al-Aqsa mosque and the subsequent protests in which Palestinians threw stones. 

To be clear, “clashes” is a term which belongs to the realm of diplomacy and is better situated within the clinical language of a government press release rather than a newspaper article which seeks to inform. Diplomats use the term because they either do not want to appear biased to one side, or because they want to sanitize the bloodshed which their allies caused. 

Unlike diplomats, journalists’ job is not to sanitize or mask the true consequences of violence. Instead their duty is to inform the readers of the current situation, its long term consequences, and its root causes. “Clashes” should only be used in an article when the journalist does not know the exact circumstances of an event, only that violence occurred between two sides. 

But in Jerusalem, and now in Gaza, all the details are known. A flood of pictures and videos have documented the Israeli crackdown, bombardment of the Gaza strip and Hamas’s rockets landing in Tel Aviv. 

The continued use of terms like “clashes” obscures details from the audience and implies an equality of force between the Israeli and Palestinian side which is contrary with the true power dynamics in Israel and the Palestinian territories. A confrontation between well equipped soldiers backed by one of the most militarily powerful states in the world and protesters with stones is not a “clash.” A mob of Israelis dragging an Arab driver from his car and beating him unconscious is not a “clash,” it is a lynching. 

Further, in establishing the immediate causes of the latest flare up in violence, it’s important to give a full context to readers. It is not just the raid in al-Aqsa or the cleansing of Sheikh Jarrah of its Palestinian residents which has led to Palestinian anger, but instead decades of oppression under an apartheid system which have led to the current fighting. 

Compare this 1986 New York Times article on a riot in Apartheid South Africa to today’s coverage of the situation in the Palestinian Territories and Israel.

The article opens immediately with a direct description of who was killed, and who killed them. Notably, the victims are put front and center.

Eleven blacks were shot dead by security forces and 62 other people injured in a night of street fighting that engulfed a section of Soweto overnight.” 

There is no passive voice vaguery here. 

The article goes on to immediately frame the riots and confrontations with the local security forces—whose trigger was also the attempted eviction of residents from their homes—as a response to long-running political grievances.

Rents yield most of the revenue for township administrative authorities, many of them unpopular bodies, and so part of the protest stemmed from resentment of what black activists call the financing of their own oppression.”

Journalists covering the events in the Palestinian Territories and Israel should similarly put political grievances of the Palestinians front and center. Otherwise, portraying the current situation as a tit-for-tat exchange ignores the less visible, but just as important, forms of violence perpetrated against Palestinians under the Israeli apartheid system for decades.

Chronology and proportionality 

In reporting on ongoing conflicts, establishing a clear timeline for readers is crucial. Doing so helps the audience wade through the outpouring of details, most of which involve military technology and geographies which are unfamiliar to the general reader. 

As Michael F. Brown of the Electronic Intifada wrote on May 11, many of the most prominent western outlets are failing to establish a proper timeline of events in the exchanges of rocket fire between Hamas and Israel. 

Brown notes that media outlets should treat the Israeli raid on al-Aqsa as the first act of aggression of the conflict, not the rockets launched by Hamas. Hamas warned Israel that if it did not withdraw its forces from al-Aqsa by 6 pm on May 10, it would retaliate. By framing Hamas’ launching of rockets as the cause of the current conflict and establishing Hamas as the aggressor, journalists completely wash over Israel’s actions in al-Aqsa and promote one side’s narrative at the expense of the other.

Finally, there is the issue of proportionality. Here we will first use the term as it’s defined in International Humanitarian Law (IHL), then in its more conventional usage.

In IHL, the principle of proportionality necessitates that any “collateral damage” from military action must be justified by the “anticipated military gains” from said military action. This means that if a military force targets a senior military leader in an airstrike, and mistakenly kills a civilian in the process, the casualty is probably justified due to the strategic gain of killing the military leader. 

Without access to classified information or the Israeli war room, it’s impossible to definitively say that Israel is violating this principle in Gaza. However, the leveling of entire apartment buildings in Gaza certainly does not seem to be in the spirit of proportionality. Journalists should do well to at least raise the question over whether or not this principle is being respected. If it is not, then serious allegations of war crimes come into play—which, in any other context, would be a journalist’s wet dream to be the first to report on. 

In its more conventional usage, proportionality refers to an equal response. What is happening in Gaza is clearly disproportionate to the attacks that Hamas launched against Israel. While Israeli citizens are rushed to bomb shelters and are somewhat protected against rockets by the Iron Dome missile defense systems, Gazans wait out in the open, hoping their building will not be struck next.

Already the casualty figures point to a pitched conflict. As of the article’s publishing, 83 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and six Israelis have been killed. Bombs dropped by Israeli fighter jets flatten entire buildings in the Gaza Strip, creating far greater destruction than anywhere seen in Israel. 

Military leaders have no incentive to fight fair; inflicting the maximum damage while minimizing your own is a good strategy and is in fact a key part of Israeli military doctrine. This is the entire logic behind asymmetric warfare, and is what enables American soldiers stationed in Nevada to rain death upon Pashtun farmers in Afghanistan with the twitch of a joystick. 

However, journalists are not soldiers. What is good strategy for the Israeli military might mean death and terror for Palestinians trapped in the open-air prison that is Gaza. Journalists have a duty to report on this with a sensitivity and preciseness that highlights the very human plight of those affected.

By adopting a tone of clinical detachment, journalists hope to demonstrate that they are treating both sides equally. However in the process, they are masking just how deeply unequal this conflict really is.

*Picture: Journalists take cover while Israeli tanks and snipers open fire during a demonstration to mark the 60th anniversary of al-Nakba on May 15, 2008 in the Gaza Strip. (Abid Khatib - Getty Images)

More Articles

Fact or Fiction? Quantifying the 'Truth' in True-Crime Podcasts

Over the centuries, true crime narratives have migrated across mediums—from tabloids and books to documentaries, films, and, most recently, podcasts. Despite these evolutions, one constant endures: the storytellers’ drive to detail the darkest corners of human behaviour and the insatiable curiosity of their audiences.

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 28 Nov, 2024
Why Are Journalists Being Silenced in Kashmir?

Since the revocation of Article 370 in 2019, press freedom in Indian-administered Kashmir has sharply declined, with local journalists facing harassment, surveillance, and charges under anti-terror laws, while foreign correspondents are denied access or deported for critical reporting. These measures, aimed at controlling the region’s narrative and projecting normalcy, have drawn widespread criticism from international watchdogs, who warn of increasing suppression of both domestic and foreign media.

headshot
AJR Correspondent Published on: 27 Nov, 2024
Gender Inequity in Sports Reporting: Female Journalists Demand Equality

Gender inequality persists in sports journalism, with female reporters significantly under-represented, as shown by studies revealing that only 5.1% of sports articles are written by women. Advocates call for equal representation, more inclusive hiring practices, and a broader focus on women's sports to challenge stereotypes, improve coverage, and give women a stronger voice in shaping sports narratives.

Akem
Akem Nkwain Published on: 18 Nov, 2024
Challenging the Narrative: Jeremy Scahill on the Need for Adversarial Journalism

Investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill calls for a revival of "adversarial journalism" to reinstate crucial professional and humanitarian values in mainstream Western media, especially regarding the coverage of the Gaza genocide.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 10 Nov, 2024
Monitoring of Journalistic Malpractices in Gaza Coverage

On this page, the editorial team of the Al Jazeera Journalism Review will collect news published by media institutions about the current war on Gaza that involves disinformation, bias, or professional journalistic standards and its code of ethics.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 23 Oct, 2024
A Year of Genocide and Bias: Western Media's Whitewashing of Israel's Ongoing War on Gaza

Major Western media outlets continue to prove that they are a party in the war of narratives, siding with the Israeli occupation. The article explains how these major Western media outlets are still refining their techniques of bias in favor of the occupation, even a year after the genocide in Palestine.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 9 Oct, 2024
Testimonies of the First Witness of the Sabra & Shatila Massacre

The Sabra and Shatila massacre in 1982 saw over 3,000 unarmed Palestinian refugees brutally killed by Phalangist militias under the facilitation of Israeli forces. As the first journalist to enter the camps, Japanese journalist Ryuichi Hirokawa provides a harrowing first-hand account of the atrocity amid a media blackout. His testimony highlights the power of bearing witness to a war crime and contrasts the past Israeli public outcry with today’s silence over the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Mei Shigenobu مي شيغينوبو
Mei Shigenobu Published on: 18 Sep, 2024
Journalist Mothers in Gaza: Living the Ordeal Twice

Being a journalist, particularly a female journalist covering the genocide in Palestine without any form of protection, makes practicing journalism nearly impossible. When the journalist is also a mother haunted by the fear of losing her children, working in the field becomes an immense sacrifice.

Amani Shninu
Amani Shninu Published on: 15 Sep, 2024
Anonymous Sources in the New York Times... Covering the War with One Eye

The use of anonymous sources in journalism is considered, within professional and ethical standards, a “last option” for journalists. However, analysis of New York Times data reveals a persistent pattern in the use of “anonymity” to support specific narratives, especially Israeli narratives.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 8 Sep, 2024
Cameroonian Journalists at the Center of Fighting Illegal Fishing

While the EU’s red card to Cameroon has undeniably tarnished its image, it has paradoxically unlocked the potential of Cameroonian journalists and ignited a movement poised to reshape the future. Through this shared struggle, journalists, scientists, conservationists, storytellers, and government officials have united, paving the way for a new era of ocean advocacy.

Shuimo Trust Dohyee
Shuimo Trust Dohyee Published on: 21 Aug, 2024
The Gaza Journalist and the "Heart and Mind" Struggle

Inside the heart of a Palestinian journalist living in Gaza, there are two personas: one is a human who wants to protect his own life and that of his family, and the other is a journalist committed to safeguarding the lives of the people by holding on to the truth and staying in the field. Between these two extremes, or what journalist Maram Hamid describes as the struggle between the heart and the mind, the Palestinian journalist continues to share a narrative that the occupation intended to keep "away from the camera."

Maram
Maram Humaid Published on: 18 Aug, 2024
Journalists Recount the Final Moments of Ismail Al-Ghoul

Journalists remembering the slain reporter of Al Jazeera in Northern Gaza, Ismail Al Ghoul. "He insisted on continuing his coverage from the northern part of the Gaza Strip, despite the challenges and obstacles he faced. He was arrested and interrogated by the Israeli army, his brother was killed in an Israeli airstrike, and his father passed away during treatment abroad."

Mohammad Abu Don
Mohammad Abu Don Published on: 11 Aug, 2024
Analysis: Media Disinformation and UK Far-Right Riots

Analysis on the impact of media disinformation on public opinion, particularly during UK riots incited by far-right groups. A look at how sensationalist media can directly influence audience behavior, as per the Hypodermic Needle Theory, leading to normalized discrimination and violence. The need for responsible journalism is emphasized to prevent such harmful effects.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 8 Aug, 2024
Challenges for Female Journalists in Crisis Zones of Cameroon

Testimonies of what female journalists in Cameroon are facing and how they are challenging these difficulties.

Akem
Akem Nkwain Published on: 30 Jul, 2024
From TV Screens to YouTube: The Rise of Exiled Journalists in Pakistan

Pakistani journalists are leveraging YouTube to overcome censorship, connecting with global audiences, and redefining independent reporting in their homeland.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 28 Jul, 2024
Daughters of Data: African Female Journalists Using Data to Reveal Hidden Truths

A growing network of African women journalists, data scientists, and tech experts is amplifying female voices and highlighting underreported stories across the continent by producing data-driven projects and leveraging digital technologies in storytelling.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 23 Jul, 2024
Are Podcasts the Future of African Broadcasting?

The surge of podcasts across Africa is a burgeoning trend, encompassing a wide array of themes and subjects, and swiftly expanding across various nations.

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 11 Jul, 2024
Video Volunteers: How India’s Marginalised Groups Tell Their Own Stories

Video creators like Rohini Pawar and Shabnam Begum have transcended societal challenges by producing influential videos with Video Volunteers, highlighting social issues within marginalized communities. Their work exemplifies the transformative power of storytelling in fostering grassroots change and empowerment across India.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Jul, 2024
Climate Journalism in Vietnam's Censored Landscape

In Vietnam, climate journalists face challenges due to censorship and restrictions on press freedom, making it difficult to report environmental issues accurately. Despite these obstacles, there are still journalists working to cover climate stories creatively and effectively, highlighting the importance of climate journalism in addressing environmental concerns.

AJR Contributor Published on: 26 Jun, 2024
Challenges of Investigating Subculture Stories in Japan as a Foreign Correspondent

Japan's vibrant subcultures and feminist activists challenge the reductive narratives often portrayed in Western media. To understand this dynamic society authentically, journalists must approach their reporting with patience, commitment, and empathy, shedding preconceptions and engaging deeply with the nuances of Japanese culture.

Johann Fleuri
Johann Fleuri Published on: 24 Jun, 2024
Covering the War on Gaza: As a Journalist, Mother, and Displaced Person

What takes precedence: feeding a hungry child or providing professional coverage of a genocidal war? Journalist Marah Al Wadiya shares her story of balancing motherhood, displacement, psychological turmoil, and the relentless struggle to find safety in an unsafe region.

Marah Al Wadiya
Marah Al Wadiya Published on: 29 May, 2024
Fighting Misinformation and Disinformation to Foster Social Governance in Africa

Experts in Africa are using various digital media tools to raise awareness and combat the increasing usage of misinformation and disinformation to manipulate social governance.

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 22 May, 2024
"I Am Still Alive!": The Resilient Voices of Gaza's Journalists

The Israeli occupation has escalated from targeting journalists to intimidating and killing their families. Hisham Zaqqout, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Gaza talks about his experience covering the war and the delicate balance between family obligations and professional duty.

Hisham Zakkout Published on: 15 May, 2024
Under Fire: The Perilous Reality for Journalists in Gaza's War Zone

Journalists lack safety equipment and legal protection, highlighting the challenges faced by journalists in Gaza. While Israel denies responsibility for targeting journalists, the lack of international intervention leaves journalists in Gaza exposed to daily danger.

Linda Shalash
Linda Shalash Published on: 9 May, 2024