Al Jazeera Journalism Review

A picture of Palestinian journalists laying on their stomachs as Israeli snipers fire passes by them.

In coverage of Palestine, biases and irresponsible journalism emerge

As journalists, we follow a few simple rules in order to communicate as clearly as we can with our audience. 

One of the first rules we learn is to always write in the active voice, so it is evident who is doing an action, what the action is, and to whom the action is being done. Consider the following sentence: “Man kills wife and children in fit of rage.” In this sentence, we have identified the criminal, his victims, his actions and his motive for said actions.

Basic stuff. And yet for some reason, current reporting on the ongoing Israeli bombardment of Gaza and the escalating conflict between Israelis and Palestinians is willfully ignoring these basic rules. Take the following tweet from German News Outlet Deutsche Welle on May 12, 2021. 


A tweet from German News Outlet DW.

This tweet flouts all the basic principles of a proper headline, to the detriment of the audience. 

Due to its reliance on passive voice, the reader does not know who did the action, what the action is (children having been killed is not an action, it is a consequence), or how the action happened. Further, the muddled language of the headline leads one to believe that the nine children were killed while fighting Israel—which is obviously not the case.

If we rewrite the tweet according to the proper conventions of headline-writing, it would sound more like this: “Israeli airstrikes kill nine children in Gaza Strip.” Now we know who killed the children, how they were killed, and the consequences of Israeli airstrikes. 

The strange tendency of so many reputable news outlets to suddenly write vague and misleading headlines when it comes to Israeli actions in Palestine not only points towards a bias towards the Israelis, but also misleads readers. 

For example, a Reuters headline on May 10 describing what appears to be a ramming of a crowd of Palestinian protesters by an Israeli driver completely leaves out the ramming, and the fact that a Palestinian man was struck by the vehicle. Even if the ramming was unintentional, the main event of the story, the ramming of a vehicle into a crowd of protesters, should be the focus of the headline, and should certainly not be described as a mere “crash.” Readers scanning the headlines or scrolling through social media, would have no idea that this ramming ever took place. 

A screenshot of a Reuters headline.

Compare the headline to another Reuters headline describing a very similar event last year, where it appeared a Palestinian rammed his car into a police checkpoint.

A screenshot of a Reuters headline.

Here the Reuters headline puts the car-ramming front and center. Though there was the same doubt present over whether or not the crash was intentional or the result of losing control of the vehicle, Reuters did not describe it as a “crash.” 

What is the difference here? One driver was Israeli and one was Palestinian. 


Already social media is inflamed with criticism over journalists’ use of “clashes” to describe the raiding of Al-Aqsa mosque and the subsequent protests in which Palestinians threw stones. 

To be clear, “clashes” is a term which belongs to the realm of diplomacy and is better situated within the clinical language of a government press release rather than a newspaper article which seeks to inform. Diplomats use the term because they either do not want to appear biased to one side, or because they want to sanitize the bloodshed which their allies caused. 

Unlike diplomats, journalists’ job is not to sanitize or mask the true consequences of violence. Instead their duty is to inform the readers of the current situation, its long term consequences, and its root causes. “Clashes” should only be used in an article when the journalist does not know the exact circumstances of an event, only that violence occurred between two sides. 

But in Jerusalem, and now in Gaza, all the details are known. A flood of pictures and videos have documented the Israeli crackdown, bombardment of the Gaza strip and Hamas’s rockets landing in Tel Aviv. 

The continued use of terms like “clashes” obscures details from the audience and implies an equality of force between the Israeli and Palestinian side which is contrary with the true power dynamics in Israel and the Palestinian territories. A confrontation between well equipped soldiers backed by one of the most militarily powerful states in the world and protesters with stones is not a “clash.” A mob of Israelis dragging an Arab driver from his car and beating him unconscious is not a “clash,” it is a lynching. 

Further, in establishing the immediate causes of the latest flare up in violence, it’s important to give a full context to readers. It is not just the raid in al-Aqsa or the cleansing of Sheikh Jarrah of its Palestinian residents which has led to Palestinian anger, but instead decades of oppression under an apartheid system which have led to the current fighting. 

Compare this 1986 New York Times article on a riot in Apartheid South Africa to today’s coverage of the situation in the Palestinian Territories and Israel.

The article opens immediately with a direct description of who was killed, and who killed them. Notably, the victims are put front and center.

Eleven blacks were shot dead by security forces and 62 other people injured in a night of street fighting that engulfed a section of Soweto overnight.” 

There is no passive voice vaguery here. 

The article goes on to immediately frame the riots and confrontations with the local security forces—whose trigger was also the attempted eviction of residents from their homes—as a response to long-running political grievances.

Rents yield most of the revenue for township administrative authorities, many of them unpopular bodies, and so part of the protest stemmed from resentment of what black activists call the financing of their own oppression.”

Journalists covering the events in the Palestinian Territories and Israel should similarly put political grievances of the Palestinians front and center. Otherwise, portraying the current situation as a tit-for-tat exchange ignores the less visible, but just as important, forms of violence perpetrated against Palestinians under the Israeli apartheid system for decades.

Chronology and proportionality 

In reporting on ongoing conflicts, establishing a clear timeline for readers is crucial. Doing so helps the audience wade through the outpouring of details, most of which involve military technology and geographies which are unfamiliar to the general reader. 

As Michael F. Brown of the Electronic Intifada wrote on May 11, many of the most prominent western outlets are failing to establish a proper timeline of events in the exchanges of rocket fire between Hamas and Israel. 

Brown notes that media outlets should treat the Israeli raid on al-Aqsa as the first act of aggression of the conflict, not the rockets launched by Hamas. Hamas warned Israel that if it did not withdraw its forces from al-Aqsa by 6 pm on May 10, it would retaliate. By framing Hamas’ launching of rockets as the cause of the current conflict and establishing Hamas as the aggressor, journalists completely wash over Israel’s actions in al-Aqsa and promote one side’s narrative at the expense of the other.

Finally, there is the issue of proportionality. Here we will first use the term as it’s defined in International Humanitarian Law (IHL), then in its more conventional usage.

In IHL, the principle of proportionality necessitates that any “collateral damage” from military action must be justified by the “anticipated military gains” from said military action. This means that if a military force targets a senior military leader in an airstrike, and mistakenly kills a civilian in the process, the casualty is probably justified due to the strategic gain of killing the military leader. 

Without access to classified information or the Israeli war room, it’s impossible to definitively say that Israel is violating this principle in Gaza. However, the leveling of entire apartment buildings in Gaza certainly does not seem to be in the spirit of proportionality. Journalists should do well to at least raise the question over whether or not this principle is being respected. If it is not, then serious allegations of war crimes come into play—which, in any other context, would be a journalist’s wet dream to be the first to report on. 

In its more conventional usage, proportionality refers to an equal response. What is happening in Gaza is clearly disproportionate to the attacks that Hamas launched against Israel. While Israeli citizens are rushed to bomb shelters and are somewhat protected against rockets by the Iron Dome missile defense systems, Gazans wait out in the open, hoping their building will not be struck next.

Already the casualty figures point to a pitched conflict. As of the article’s publishing, 83 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza and six Israelis have been killed. Bombs dropped by Israeli fighter jets flatten entire buildings in the Gaza Strip, creating far greater destruction than anywhere seen in Israel. 

Military leaders have no incentive to fight fair; inflicting the maximum damage while minimizing your own is a good strategy and is in fact a key part of Israeli military doctrine. This is the entire logic behind asymmetric warfare, and is what enables American soldiers stationed in Nevada to rain death upon Pashtun farmers in Afghanistan with the twitch of a joystick. 

However, journalists are not soldiers. What is good strategy for the Israeli military might mean death and terror for Palestinians trapped in the open-air prison that is Gaza. Journalists have a duty to report on this with a sensitivity and preciseness that highlights the very human plight of those affected.

By adopting a tone of clinical detachment, journalists hope to demonstrate that they are treating both sides equally. However in the process, they are masking just how deeply unequal this conflict really is.

*Picture: Journalists take cover while Israeli tanks and snipers open fire during a demonstration to mark the 60th anniversary of al-Nakba on May 15, 2008 in the Gaza Strip. (Abid Khatib - Getty Images)

Related Articles

Palestine underground: A new face for local radio

THE LONG READ: How Palestine’s Radio Alhara is taking a grassroots approach to shaping a new landscape for protest, culture and local journalism online.

Ashley Tan
Ashley Tan Published on: 21 Oct, 2021
'They called me a traitor' - tales of a local freelance journalist in Yemen

Very few international journalists are currently based in Yemen because it is simply too dangerous to go there. Local - often freelance - reporters have continued to tell the stories of the human suffering there, however, and are facing greater dangers from militias than ever before. Our writer explains how he had to change the way he did his job, just to survive.

Muatasm Alhitari
Muatasm Alhitari Published on: 18 Oct, 2021
‘I became a journalist because we need to be heard’ - telling the stories of Palestine

THE LONG READ: Many journalists in Palestine only entered the profession through a need to make their suffering known to the world. So what does it take to tell stories of tragedy and personal loss to which you yourself are deeply connected while maintaining objectivity?

Yousef Aljamal
Yousef M Aljamal Published on: 13 Oct, 2021
Reporter’s notebook - covering crisis in Lebanon

Lebanon has undergone a seismic economic collapse triggered by the financial crisis and compounded by last year’s shocking port explosion in Beirut. Al’s correspondent describes what it has been like to cover the ongoing story.

Arwa Ibrahim
Arwa Ibrahim Published on: 5 Oct, 2021
Radio Gargaar - grassroots broadcasting to refugees in Kenya

What it’s like to host a radio show in the Dadaab refugee camp, situated in one of the world’s most overlooked regions, during a global pandemic.

Abdullahi Mire
Abdullahi Mire Published on: 3 Oct, 2021
Witnessing the killing of Muhammad al-Durrah in Gaza - the cameraman's tale

Twenty-one years ago, a video of a 12-year-old boy being killed in Gaza reverberated around the world. Talal Abu Rahma, the cameraman who shot the video, described that day.

Talal Abu Rahma
Talal Abu Rahma Published on: 30 Sep, 2021
Have you been hacked? - What Pegasus spyware revelations mean for journalists

How to protect yourself following the news that sophisticated spyware has been used to hack the smartphones of journalists, activists and politicians around the world.

Mei Shigenobu
Mei Shigenobu Published on: 19 Sep, 2021
‘Journalism is sacred work’ - Afghanistan’s frontline reporters

THE LONG READ: Afghanistan ranks as one of the world’s most dangerous countries for journalists. Yet despite targeted killings and an uncertain future, many Afghan reporters are determined to stay and bear witness.

Robyn Huang & Matt Reichel Published on: 14 Sep, 2021
How can we confront Islamophobia in the media?

The events of September 11, 2001 exacerbated anti-Muslim sentiment in the Western media, but Islamophobia had been around for a long time beforehand.

Khawla Nakua
Khawla Nakua Published on: 12 Sep, 2021
‘It was like the end of the world’ - the reporter's tale from 9/11

Al Jazeera’s Washington correspondent recalls the events of September 11, and explains how life for him as a Muslim journalist in America was forever changed in the aftermath

Mohammed Alami
Mohammed Alami Published on: 8 Sep, 2021
We were journalists in Afghanistan - I got out; he was killed

Afghan journalist Zakarya Hassani escaped from Kabul to Paris after the Taliban takeover. Later, he watched in anguish as his best friend, Alireza Ahmadi, died trying to do the same.

Zakarya Hassani
Zakarya Hassani Published on: 6 Sep, 2021
The fall of Kabul - lessons from a field reporter 

Al Jazeera's correspondent in Afghanistan describes what it was like to report events during the recent Taliban takeover.

Younes Ait Yassine Published on: 2 Sep, 2021
How the Pandemic Introduced Me to Mobile Journalism

How our senior correspondent at Aljazeera English, Natasha Ghoneim, discovered the power of her mobile phone during the pandemic.

Natasha Ghoneim Published on: 23 Aug, 2021
Protecting Newsgathering through the Sustainable Use of Social Media

All journalists old enough to have worked in a pre-social media world, will have had that moment.

Sam Dubberley Published on: 16 Aug, 2021
War Stories on Social Media: Audience Engagement and Ethical Hiring Practices

The horrific scenes became more accessible than ever before.

Sakhr Al-Makhadhi Published on: 23 Jun, 2021
Overcoming Barriers and Hazards: A Woman’s Experience Reporting in Gaza

The first female fixer and journalist in Gaza shares her experiences of reporting in the besieged Palestinian enclave.

An image of the author, Ameera Ahmad Harouda.
Ameera Ahmad Harouda Published on: 20 May, 2021
The internet "kill switch" in the Arab World

Government-imposed internet blackouts in the Middle East have profound effects on the media and civil freedoms across the region.

A black and white picture of the author.
Oussama Hamama Published on: 21 Apr, 2021
Risking their lives on the frontlines, journalists in Brazil’s favelas struggle for recognition

By all measures, journalists from Rio’s favelas are among the bravest war reporters in the world, facing a constant threat of violence from all directions. Still, favela journalists continue human rights violations and serve their community.

A picture of the author, Daniel Avelar, wearing a black and white checkered scarf.
Daniel Avelar Published on: 11 Mar, 2021
Reporting under occupation in Palestine

As a Palestinian, you live and sometimes die covering the story of your own people.

A picture of the author, Awad Joumaa
Awad Joumaa Published on: 28 Feb, 2021
Close up and personal

Can Arabs accurately report their own affairs? Can Muslims be reliable sources of objective information about their daily lives and historic changes? We from the Arab and Muslim world are rethinking the news.

Hamid Dabashi Published on: 15 Feb, 2021