Al Jazeera Journalism Review

outside image
Gaurav Sawant (C) and Shiv Aroor (R) of India Today, pictured here receiving a journalism award in New Delhi in 2011, are two of the news presenters who are being boycotted by INDIA, the alliance of Opposition parties [Ramesh Sharma/The India Today Group via Getty Images]

Why have opposition parties in India issued a boycott of 14 TV presenters?

Media workers in India argue that boycotts of individual journalists are not the answer to pro-Government reporting bias


Last month, the Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance, an alliance of opposition parties led by the Indian National Congress, issued a list of 14 news anchors who it said it will boycott because they deem them to be fuelling hate in the country.

The alliance - known by its acronym, INDIA - which holds power in 11 states of India, comprises 28 political parties with more expected to join ahead of general elections in May 2024. 

In this most recent move, the INDIA alliance said it would refuse to send representatives on TV shows presented by or featuring Aman Chopra, Amish Devgan and Anand Narasimhan of News 18; Chitra Tripathi and Sudhir Chaudhary of Aaj Tak; Gaurav Sawant and Shiv Aroor of India Today; Prachi Parashar of India TV; Arnab Goswami of Republic Bharat; Rubika Liyaquat of Bharat 24; Navika Kumar and Sushant Sinha of Times Now Navbharat; Aditi Tyagi of Bharat Express; and Ashok Shrivastav of national broadcaster Doordarshan News. 

The move comes amid concerns about media bias in India. A survey of independent journalists and news consumers was carried out earlier this year by the think tank, Lokniti, and the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies. It revealed worries about significant media bias in favour of the Narendra Modi government.

The survey discovered that 82 percent of independent journalists perceived favouritism towards Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), while a mere 3 percent noted a similar bias towards the Indian National Congress.

Rubika Liyaquat, one of the 14 boycotted journalists, interviews Smriti Irani, Union Minister for Women and Child Development and Textiles in 2020. Liyaquat was previously an anchor at ABP News and is now at Bharat 24 [Dheeraj Dhawan/Hindustan Times via Getty Images]

The study also highlighted that 72 percent of participants believed news channels encounter constraints in carrying out their responsibilities, with newspapers and digital media encountering similar challenges.

Only about one in five news consumers responded that the media in India gives balanced political coverage and said, neither is it too favourable towards the government/opposition nor is it too unfavourable.

The report was released on October 20, 2022, and is titled “Media in India: Access, Practices, Concerns, and Effects”. The report analysed data to show how different communities are consuming news and how the media landscape is operating in India.


‘Godi media - sensationalist and biased’

‘Godi Media’ is the nickname given to journalists who support the current ruling National Democratic Alliance government (since 2014), led by the right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

The term is a pun on the name of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and has become a common way to refer to television and other media that are perceived as “mouthpieces” of the ruling party in India, the Bharatiya Janata Party. They are often accused of being sensationalist and biased.

Bias in the media is a critical issue in India, which ranks at a lowly 161 out of 180 countries on the 2023 Press Freedom Index produced by Reporters Without Borders (RSF).

Arnab Goswami, Editor in Chief and news anchor at Republic, is one of the 14 boycotted news anchors [Bhaskar Paul/The India Today Group via Getty Images]

Other studies of Indian media have reached a similar conclusion. “A study of 30 Indian newspapers and 41 Indian TV channels with the largest viewership rates in the country confirms the existence of rampant media bias during a two-year period from 2017 to 2018,” reads a study titled Media Bias and Democracy in India, published in 2021. “The BJP spends almost $140 million on publicity per year, with 43 percent of this expenditure focusing specifically on print ads in newspapers. Government advertisements serve as a financial lever for influencing media content and public opinion. For example, during the year leading to the 2019 elections, newspapers that received more advertisement revenue from the BJP were likely to espouse more conservative ideology and to have more conservative readers.” 

As a result, the decision not to attend debates and news shows hosted by pro-government news anchors has been welcomed by many in the country.

A representative of a regional political party in Uttar Pradesh, for example, spoke to Al Jazeera Journalism Review on condition of anonymity. He said that a policy of non-cooperation with these news anchors was the “best way to answer the totally one sided coverage of the political news”.

“These anchors were speaking the language of one particular party and their journalism cannot be called unbiased. Representatives of the different political parties were called by them on their panels, they were insulted, not given proper airtime and ridiculed. They spew hate everyday so the decision was taken to boycott them. 

“We, political parties, do not have enmity with any of these journalists but our differences are on the practice of journalism which was not balanced,” the representative of the political party said. 


‘Only following orders’

However, the news that opposition parties have taken to boycotting news presenters they deem to be pro-government, has not been welcomed by all those opposed to pro-government bias in the media.

Ram Dutt Tripathi, a former journalist with South Asia, told Al Jazeera Journalism Review that the boycotting of journalists by political parties is “not an ideal situation” and said he blames the owners of news channels for this. Instead of boycotting journalists, however, opposition parties should have left them to be punished by falling viewing figures as a result of their bias.

BJP leader Sudhanshu Trivedi talks with journalist Sudhir Chaudhary - one of the 14 boycotted anchors - during a reception on February 20, 2018 in New Delhi, India [Manoj Verma/Hindustan Times via Getty Images]

“The journalism of the boycotted journalists was already in question and it is one of the reasons they were being dubbed ‘Godi Media’. These people did not understand that they had to come with a balanced view for news. 

“The leaders of the opposition political parties were being ridiculed by these 14 journalists and their practice of journalism was not an ideal journalism. Ideally an assurance should have come from these boycotted journalists that their views will be balanced.”

This, of course, did not happen. “This is not journalism and this is hurting the credibility of the media. The viewership [numbers are] coming down and you are hurting your profession,” he said. 

But Tripathi added: “These news channels should see that technology has become so advanced that no one needs a news channel, the opposition can do it using their social media. Majority of the news today is made using social media feeds.”

Furthermore, he argues, coverage bias is the fault of media company owners, not the journalists, as the editorial policies are set by them. 

“These anchors are merely following orders and they too have responsibilities, EMIs (home loans) and bills to pay,” he added.

“To restore the credibility of Indian media, there should be an independent watchdog to rein in all these news channels. We do not have a proper watchdog and the Press Council of India is defunct.” 

Indian journalist Gaurav Sawant - one of the 14 boycotted TV anchors - is pictured receiving an award in 2011. [Ramesh Sharma/The India Today Group via Getty Images]


An ineffective policy?

Professor Kalyan Arun, a professor at Asian College of Journalism, in India, believes that the umbrella ban by the political parties  on these 14 anchors is not going to make much impact because their representatives might still sit on the panel of these television channels but with a different anchor.

“While joining any organisation, one should first understand their editorial policy and it is very easy. A journalist can ask his/her editor to not work on a beat where his/her biases can overlap. For example, while working as a journalist with a newspaper I had to tell my editor that I will not be writing flowery pieces of a politician because I did not like her but keeping my biases aside I covered that politician’s event which were important.

“I personally feel that editors and owners should be held accountable because they draft their editorial policies and not journalists because these journalists have to follow their editorial guidelines and they also have their bills to pay.”


More Articles

Covering the War on Gaza: As a Journalist, Mother, and Displaced Person

What takes precedence: feeding a hungry child or providing professional coverage of a genocidal war? Journalist Marah Al Wadiya shares her story of balancing motherhood, displacement, psychological turmoil, and the relentless struggle to find safety in an unsafe region.

Marah Al Wadiya
Marah Al Wadiya Published on: 29 May, 2024
Fighting Misinformation and Disinformation to Foster Social Governance in Africa

Experts in Africa are using various digital media tools to raise awareness and combat the increasing usage of misinformation and disinformation to manipulate social governance.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 22 May, 2024
"I Am Still Alive!": The Resilient Voices of Gaza's Journalists

The Israeli occupation has escalated from targeting journalists to intimidating and killing their families. Hisham Zaqqout, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Gaza talks about his experience covering the war and the delicate balance between family obligations and professional duty.

Hisham Zakkout Published on: 15 May, 2024
Under Fire: The Perilous Reality for Journalists in Gaza's War Zone

Journalists lack safety equipment and legal protection, highlighting the challenges faced by journalists in Gaza. While Israel denies responsibility for targeting journalists, the lack of international intervention leaves journalists in Gaza exposed to daily danger.

Linda Shalash
Linda Shalash Published on: 9 May, 2024
Elections and Misinformation – India Case Study

Realities are hidden behind memes and political satire in the battle for truth in the digital age. Explore how misinformation is influencing political decisions and impacting first-time voters, especially in India's 2024 elections, and how journalists fact-check and address fake news, revealing the true impact of misinformation and AI-generated content.

Safina Nabi Published on: 30 Apr, 2024
Amid Increasing Pressure, Journalists in India Practice More Self-Censorship

In a country where nearly 970 million people are participating in a crucial general election, the state of journalism in India is under scrutiny. Journalists face harassment, self-censorship, and attacks, especially under the current Modi-led government. Mainstream media also practices self-censorship to avoid repercussions. The future of journalism in India appears uncertain, but hope lies in the resilience of independent media outlets.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 25 Apr, 2024
The Privilege and Burden of Conflict Reporting in Nigeria: Navigating the Emotional Toll

The internal struggle and moral dilemmas faced by a conflict reporter, as they grapple with the overwhelming nature of the tragedies they witness and the sense of helplessness in the face of such immense suffering. It ultimately underscores the vital role of conflict journalism in preserving historical memory and giving a voice to the voiceless.

Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu
Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu Published on: 17 Apr, 2024
Journalism in chains in Cameroon

Investigative journalists in Cameroon sometimes use treacherous means to navigate the numerous challenges that hamper the practice of their profession: the absence of the Freedom of Information Act, the criminalisation of press offenses, and the scare of the overly-broad anti-terrorism law.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 12 Apr, 2024
The Perils of Journalism and the Rise of Citizen Media in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia's media landscape is grim, with low rankings for internet and press freedom across the region. While citizen journalism has risen to fill the gaps, journalists - both professional and citizen - face significant risks due to government crackdowns and the collusion between tech companies and authorities to enable censorship and surveillance.

AJR Contributor Published on: 6 Apr, 2024
Silenced Voices: The Battle for Free Expression Amid India’s Farmer’s Protest

The Indian government's use of legal mechanisms to suppress dissenting voices and news reports raises questions about transparency and freedom of expression. The challenges faced by independent media in India indicate a broader narrative of controlling the narrative and stifling dissenting voices.

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 17 Mar, 2024
Targeting Truth: Assault on Female Journalists in Gaza

For female journalists in Palestine, celebrating international women's rights this year must take a backseat, as they continue facing the harsh realities of conflict. March 8th will carry little celebration for them, as they grapple with the severe risks of violence, mass displacement, and the vulnerability of abandonment amidst an ongoing humanitarian crisis. Their focus remains on bearing witness to human suffering and sharing stories of resilience from the frontlines, despite the personal dangers involved in their work.

Fatima Bashir
Fatima Bashir Published on: 14 Mar, 2024
A Woman's Journey Reporting on Pakistan's Thrilling Cholistan Desert Jeep Rally

A Woman's Voice in the Desert: Navigating the Spotlight

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 8 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Blackout on Imran Khan and PTI: Analysing Pakistan's Election Press Restrictions

Implications and response to media censorship and the deliberate absence of coverage for the popular former Prime Minister, Imran Khan, and his party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), in the media during the 2024 elections in Pakistan.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 14 Feb, 2024
Digital Battlegrounds: The New Broadcasting Bill and Independent Journalism in India

New legislation in India threatens the freedom of independent journalism. The draft Broadcasting Services (Regulation) Bill, 2023 grants the government extensive power to regulate and censor content, potentially suppressing news critical of government policies.

Safina Nabi Published on: 11 Feb, 2024
Pegasus Spyware: A Grave Threat to Journalists in Southeast Asia

The widespread deployment of spyware such as Pegasus in Southeast Asia, used by governments to target opposition leaders, activists, and journalists, presents significant challenges in countering digital surveillance. This is due to its clandestine operations and the political intricacies involved. The situation underscores the urgent need for international cooperation and heightened public awareness to address these human rights infringements.

AJR Contributor Published on: 5 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
Cameroonian Media Martyrs: The Intersection of Journalism and Activism

Experts and journalists in Cameroon disagree on the relationship between journalism and activism: some say journalism is activism; others think they are worlds apart, while another category says a “very thin” line separate both

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 28 Jan, 2024
Silent Suffering: The Impact of Sexual Harassment on African Newsrooms

Sexual harassment within newsrooms and the broader journalistic ecosystem is affecting the quality and integrity of journalistic work, ultimately impacting the organisation’s integrity and revenue.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 23 Jan, 2024
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
The bombs raining down on Gaza from Israel are beyond scary, beyond crazy

REPORTER'S NOTEBOOK: As Israel bombarded Gaza for the third night, I found myself closer to a missile hit than I could have imagined

Maram Humaid Published on: 11 Oct, 2023