Al Jazeera Journalism Review

outside image

How do we determine 'newsworthiness' in the digital age?

The relentless flow of news in the digital age has re-shaped the parameters by which we decide what is 'news' and what is not

 

The academic debate around defining news value has essentially centred on the question: "Why was this story chosen for publication?"

The classic response relates, of course, to the significance of an event itself and its impact on the public interest which is a response that has little relation to the actual journalistic practice.

In the pre-internet era, there were various objective and subjective factors that influenced the decision to give a certain event the necessary news value to turn it into a news story.

These factors included the journalist's biases and interests - conscious or unconscious - the political or social leanings of the news organisation, the decisions of the owners or advertisers and the government pressures.

With the advent of digital platforms in news production, these factors have expanded. At the same time, the factors which previously influenced objectivity in determining the news value of events have transformed into new forms but produce the same biases.

For example, pressures have extended beyond the owners and advertisers to algorithms used by digital platforms which ultimately determine what gets published.

Additionally, these algorithms' control over what information and events journalists see gives them a significant role in shaping the biases of those journalists and, consequently, the new journalistic formats that inevitably result from the changing rules of dissemination dictated by the changing moods of digital platforms.

This shift of control over sources of information has made the concept of "news value" extremely fluid, and it may be difficult for even two journalists to agree on any specific criteria that make an event worthy of becoming a news story.

So, is it what’s in  "trend", an event's potential to go viral and garner views or its potential impact on public interest?

This fluidity has inevitably extended to the ethical rules of journalism as a whole; neither does objectivity permit the selection of news based on its potential to go viral nor does independence exist under the dominance of algorithms at any stage of news production.

To overcome this challenge, some advocate for the necessity of redefining journalistic rules to accommodate these digital developments, or the need to produce an entirely new ethical system of journalism that liberates itself from the old rules.

Assuming that ethics as rules change according to the change in methods of writing and publishing, this claim can be strongly argued against, because journalism transcends formalism and is not based on any particular format, template or narrative style.

Pressures have extended beyond owners and advertisers to algorithms on digital platforms which determine what gets published

 

Therefore, asserting the need for a new set of ethical rules solely because the mechanisms for news production, publication and consumption have changed, seems a flawed argument. This is especially so when these demands are used to sever ties with the profession's ethical rules, under the pretext of keeping up with the needs of the audience and the publishing rules imposed by digital platforms.

The root of today's crisis in journalism is the absence of such rules in evaluating each new practice imposed by digital publishing rules. At Al Jazeera Media Institute, we have previously published a guidebook in Arabic, entitled "Ethics of Journalism in the Digital Age".

In this guidebook, we have attempted to stimulate discussion around the most prominent new data in journalistic practice in the digital age, which necessitates in-depth discussion within newsrooms to come up with a professional mechanism for dealing with it.
 

The press and the never-ending battle for attention

In his book, "Phenomenology of Perception", the French philosopher, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, states: "The function concerned with revealing things existing in the dark is called attention". These words will seem very familiar to journalists as much of journalism literature considers the profession's core function is to reveal the violations and abuses which “take place in the dark”.

Essentially, the role of journalism revolves around drawing attention to what the public needs to focus on in its own best interests.

However, an ethical question arises here: Which aspects of the “dark” will we shed light on? Will we seek to highlight every revelation, no matter what? Is drawing attention to marginal issues equivalent to revealing major corruption scandals, for instance?

In other words, what is the news value of each revelation? And how can we determine this value in an era dominated by "viewer numbers and engagement" as an essential value for a story's success?

Adding to this question is the dilemma of attracting attention itself.

At a time when the flow of content on digital platforms has become overwhelming and audience interests have vastly fragmented, many digital newsrooms have resorted to building a content strategy based on keeping up with "the rules of engagement" in the algorithms of these platforms.

This may be due to their inability to understand these diverse interests, or to discover ways of covering them that will attract the largest possible audience. Journalists cannot be entirely blamed for this shortfall. It is an era of content saturation, and what matters to people changes rapidly.

Every day more than one issue captures the public's attention, according to the interests of each segment. I considered this issue on the last day of 2022 (December 31) when events like "Cristiano Ronaldo's transfer to Al-Nassr Football Club" were still capturing some of audiences’ attention, along with "the death of former Pope Benedict XVI", "the Russian army's bombing air raid on Kyiv, Ukraine" among many other events.

This coverage occurred in line with other news such as "an agreement between Russia and Ukraine to exchange prisoners", "migrants' boat was drowned in the north of Lebanon" and "North Korea launching three ballistic missiles" … etc.

All of these matters have news value and journalists cannot afford to ignore them, nor can they set aside this torrent of information in order to focus on revealing a major corruption scandal or produce in-depth content about anything at all.

However, do all these issues necessitate broader coverage than news reporting? And does every event which carries news value mean that it is suitable for treatment in all types of journalistic formats?

If you try to follow the life cycle of prominent news articles on digital media platforms, you will find that many automatically transition from one format to another without any evaluation of their suitability for each format.

An event may start as breaking news, then turn into an extended report, then a short video, then a long explanatory video, then a podcast episode, and so on.

The irony is that you will find the same news having gone through this exact cycle on different news platforms, leading to repetitive journalistic content, including events that perhaps do not hold news value necessitating such expansion.

This results in distracting the audience and diminishing the fundamental value of journalism as a tool for attracting and focusing attention on specific issues.

 

Between value and going ‘viral’

Today's journalistic approaches can be divided into two schools of thought. The first argues that journalism must adapt to the demands of its audiences, understand their digital behaviours and provide content that ensures engagement and reach (and the results, it can be said, are striking and statistically proven).

This must occur within frameworks that accommodate algorithms, in order to keep journalistic content trending and not leave this to non-specialists in content creation.

This necessitates a relaxation of professional and ethical standards, meaning that what determines the newsworthiness of an event is its potential for going “viral”, provoking debate and trending, potentially causing journalists to overlook important yet “boring” events.

This shift of control over sources of information has made the concept of 'news value' extremely fluid

 

The second school of thought maintains that journalism should adhere to traditional standards of determining newsworthiness; what genuinely impacts the public interest.

It advocates disciplined engagement with the algorithms of digital platforms, focusing solely on what serves the dissemination of information and draws attention to important issues, attempting to adapt new frameworks to established journalistic rules, and taking on the negative consequences of potentially being excluded by algorithms or having reduced access to the audience.

Some may argue that both approaches have their merits. On one hand, journalism cannot fulfil its function if it doesn't reach its audience. On the other, it cannot maintain its value as an institution of “truth” if it blurs the lines with content creators, influencers and platforms chasing viewing figures.

But should journalism's function be to meet the needs of the audience, whatever they may be? Should the standard of newsworthiness depend on what succeeds in going viral? And what is the value of news that doesn't reach its audience, no matter how important?

 

A new face of ‘yellow journalism’?

What we see today, from digital news platforms focusing on sensationalism and ignoring ethical and professional rules, is actually not new at all.

The success of this type of content in going “viral” has nothing to do with the audience's aversion to serious journalism.

This has been the case since the 1890s, when "yellow journalism", which places an emphasis on sensationalism, began to spread, ironically spearheaded by Joseph Pulitzer, namesake of the Pulitzer Prizes. Today, tabloids and “yellow” papers continue to dominate sales figures in many countries around the world.

The danger lies in the fact that many reputable journalistic institutions have begun to give in to these standards, which they have resisted for decades, lured by the huge rewards of going viral that ensure reach and sustainability.

This has occurred without any genuine attempt to find a middle ground or to innovate solutions that allow for the reporting of actual news in a format that can go viral, while adhering to ethical standards and maintaining news “value”.

This suggests that we may be on the brink of an era where the definition of news value is based solely on entertainment, the ability to provoke debate, inspire romantic ideals and clichéd ideas of tolerance and advocacy for sectarian identities, simply because this is what guarantees going viral.

Muhammad Khamaiseh is an editor at Al Jazeera Media Institute

Translated from the original Arabic by Yousef Awadh

More Articles

Journalism in chains in Cameroon

Investigative journalists in Cameroon sometimes use treacherous means to navigate the numerous challenges that hamper the practice of their profession: the absence of the Freedom of Information Act, the criminalisation of press offenses, and the scare of the overly-broad anti-terrorism law.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 12 Apr, 2024
The Perils of Journalism and the Rise of Citizen Media in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia's media landscape is grim, with low rankings for internet and press freedom across the region. While citizen journalism has risen to fill the gaps, journalists - both professional and citizen - face significant risks due to government crackdowns and the collusion between tech companies and authorities to enable censorship and surveillance.

AJR Contributor Published on: 6 Apr, 2024
Orientalism, Imperialism and The Western Coverage of Palestine

Western mainstream media biases and defence of the Israeli narrative are connected to orientalism, racism, and imperialism, serving the interests of Western ruling political and economic elites. However, it is being challenged by global movements aiming to shed light on the realities of the conflict and express solidarity with the Palestinian population.

Joseph Daher
Joseph Daher Published on: 1 Apr, 2024
Ethical Dilemmas of Photo Editing in Media: Lessons from Kate Middleton’s Photo Controversy

Photoshop—an intelligent digital tool celebrated for enhancing the visual appearance of photographs—is a double-edged sword. While it has the power to transform and refine images, it also skillfully blurs the line between reality and fiction, challenging the legitimacy of journalistic integrity and the credibility of news media.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 26 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
The Perils of Unverified News: A Case of Nonexistent Flotillas

Can you hide one thousand ships in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea? I would say not. But some of my fellow journalists seem to believe in magic.  

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 16 Jan, 2024
In the Courtroom and Beyond: Covering South Africa's Historic Legal Case Against Israel at The Hague

As South Africa takes on Israel at the International Court of Justice, the role of journalists in covering this landmark case becomes more crucial than ever. Their insights and reporting bring the complexities of international law to a global audience.

Hala Ahed
Hala Ahed Published on: 12 Jan, 2024
Did the NYTimes Manipulate the Sexual Violence Allegations of October 7?

An in-depth examination of the New York Times's investigation of alleged sexual assaults by Hamas during the Israeli war on Gaza, highlighting ethical concerns, and the impact of its reporting on the victims' families. It questions the journalistic integrity of the Times, especially in the context of Western media's portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 7 Jan, 2024
Is The New York Times Reproducing Allegations of 'Sexual Violence' to Downplay Israeli Crimes?

The New York Times' report on alleged sexual violence by Palestinian militants raises profound concerns about discrepancies in key testimonies and a biased reporting that aligns with Israeli narratives and downplays Israeli crimes in Gaza.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 31 Dec, 2023
Embedded journalism: Striking a balance between access and impartiality in war zones

The ethical implications of embedded journalism, particularly in the Israeli invasion of Gaza, raise concerns about the compromise of balance and independence in war coverage.

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 19 Dec, 2023
Through a Mexican lens: Navigating the intricacies of reporting in Palestine

A Mexican journalist's journey through the complexities of reporting on Palestine and gives tips on how to manage this kind of coverage.

Témoris Grecko
Témoris Grecko Published on: 10 Dec, 2023
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan
Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno
Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha
Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Mitrovica
Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023