Al Jazeera Journalism Review

The Washington Post: When Language Becomes a Veil for Pro-Israel Bias

This article was originally written in Arabic and translated into English using AI tools, followed by editorial revisions to ensure clarity and accuracy

How did The Washington Post's coverage differ between Israel’s bombing of Gaza hospitals and Iran’s strike on an Israeli hospital? Why does the paper attempt to frame Palestinian victims within a “complex operational context”? And when does language become a tool of bias toward the Israeli narrative?

 

Since the intensification of the genocidal war on the Gaza Strip in October 2023, Western media coverage—particularly by major American news outlets—has oscillated between a superficial professionalism and a structurally entrenched bias favoring the Israeli narrative. A comparative analysis of journalistic coverage of Israeli attacks on Gaza versus events in which Israel is portrayed as the victim reveals a systematic linguistic and editorial pattern that reproduces partial framing and affords Israel disproportionate sympathy and legitimacy.

Among the most conspicuous examples of such editorial bias is The Washington Post, whose lexical and editorial choices shift noticeably depending on the identity of the actor and the victim. When Israel bombed hospitals in Gaza, the newspaper employed neutral or ambiguous language. However, in reporting on Iran’s strike on an Israeli hospital, the paper adopted unequivocal language and a tone of outright condemnation—devoid of editorial caution or linguistic nuance. This disparity is not merely a matter of stylistic preference; it is a deliberate editorial and linguistic selection process reflective of the framing mechanisms that shape public perception and influence attitudes toward critical international issues—especially the ongoing campaign of genocide.

This editorial framing was particularly evident in the Western media’s coverage of Iran’s June 19, 2025, missile strike on Soroka Medical Center in Be’er Sheva, in southern Israel. Newsrooms rushed to portray the incident as a direct assault on a civilian facility, employing stern and unambiguous language. In a report titled Iranian missile strikes hospital, prompting Israeli threat of retaliation, The Washington Post characterized the attack as a “direct hit on a hospital,” quoting Israeli officials who described the strike as a “deliberate targeting of civilians” and a “flagrant violation of international law.” 

By contrast, when Israeli forces bombed hospitals in Gaza, The Washington Post opted for neutral or doubtful terminology. In the case of the Iranian strike, the paper used definitive language and a clear tone of condemnation, without hedging or editorial scrutiny.

The report also stated that the attack caused “severe damage” to the surgical ward and wounded at least 80 individuals, most of them with minor injuries. Notably, the newspaper adopted assertive, unambiguous expressions such as “missile strike” and “direct hit on the hospital,” avoiding linguistic qualifications, technical analyses, or delays in attributing responsibility to Iran. This reveals a decisive editorial stance when Israel is on the receiving end of violence.

Conversely, when it comes to repeated Israeli bombings of hospitals in Gaza, the tone shifts dramatically. The paper resorts to cautious language, deploying terms such as “explosion,” “unclear evidence,” or “no conclusive proof.” This rhetorical shift reflects a clear tendency to defer condemnation or introduce doubt into the narrative rather than naming the perpetrator outright.

For instance, in a visual analysis published by The Washington Post regarding the explosion at Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza City in October 2023, the newspaper adopted a cautious tone focused on technical video analysis and forensics. It refrained from taking a definitive stance on Israeli culpability, stating that “visual evidence does not conclusively show that Al-Ahli Hospital was hit by an Israeli airstrike,” and adding that “the damage pattern does not align with that of an aerial bombardment.”

The distinction, then, between a “direct missile strike on a civilian hospital” in Israel and an “explosion under investigation” in Gaza is not merely semantic—it stems from an underlying system that determines which victims are worthy of empathy and who merits full legal recognition as a target of bombing, starvation, or slow death.

 

Framing the Victim

On July 4, 2025, The Washington Post published a report titled Gaza doctor’s death in Israeli strike devastates medical community, detailing the killing of Dr. Marwan Al-Sultan, a prominent Palestinian physician, whose home in Jabalia, northern Gaza, was bombed by Israeli forces. Despite acknowledging his medical stature, the article avoided describing the strike as a blatant violation of international humanitarian law or a direct attack on civilians. Instead, it employed cautious language such as: “The Israeli military claimed it was targeting a Hamas operative,” and “civilian casualties are currently under review.”

This pattern of framing reproduces a discourse that casts doubt on the victim’s narrative and shifts responsibility to what is described as a “complex operational context,” while offering the Israeli military version a comfortable degree of justification—even in the absence of definitive evidence. The headline’s focus on “shock in the medical community” is a clear attempt to sidestep framing the incident as a potential war crime, evading clear legal descriptors such as “targeting a civilian doctor” or “illegal airstrike.”

This kind of language constructs a preemptively skeptical framework toward Palestinian victimhood, while providing institutional cover to Israeli military actions—even absent substantiating evidence.

In a more telling example, in May 2024, The Washington Post published an investigative report titled Mapping the damage to Gaza’s hospitals: Battered, abandoned and raided,” which detailed the destruction of the Strip’s healthcare infrastructure, reporting that 32 out of 36 hospitals had been damaged, some from direct attacks and others from repeated raids. Yet, the report avoided terminology such as “systematic bombing” or “deliberate targeting.” Instead, it used neutral phrases like “Israeli forces raided,” “facilities caught in crossfire,” and “buildings damaged during military operations.” This lexical framing clearly dilutes the legal and ethical weight of the events, recharacterizing them as incidental chaos within a symmetrical battlefield.

Likewise, in the case of the shooting of civilians at an aid distribution point in northern Gaza—an incident in which the Palestinian Ministry of Health reported 31 civilian deaths—The Washington Post initially published a report relaying these figures, but quickly retracted it. The paper then issued a revised version indicating that “the original article gave undue credence to unverified claims.” A formal apology followed on X, titled: Correction: We’ve deleted the post below because it and early versions of the article didn’t meet Post fairness standards. This editorial retraction underscores the paper’s hesitation in adopting the Palestinian narrative, even when dealing with verified civilian casualties in well-documented contexts—while simultaneously demonstrating a readiness to revise narratives that contradict official Israeli accounts or lack independent “technical evidence.”

In the Palestinian context, the consistent refusal to use terms such as “crime,” “targeting civilians,” or “illegal strikes” weakens the moral and legal weight of events, implicitly neutralizes the perpetrator’s responsibility, and justifies the actions. Conversely, deploying such vocabulary in the Israeli context reinforces the trope of the “democratic victim” facing a “terrorist aggressor.”

This bias inevitably shapes public reaction and mobilization. Definitive language can galvanize public outrage, provoke protests, and pressure governments to act. In contrast, vague and reserved wording muddles the narrative and reduces the ethical and legal burden. In this way, journalism ceases to be a neutral conduit for information and instead becomes an active participant in shaping perception—controlling not only how events are understood, but who is held accountable, and who is exonerated.

This type of professional bias cannot be separated from the relationship between major media institutions—such as The Washington Post—and the centers of political power in the United States. The media, in this case, functions less as an independent watchdog and more as a soft extension of policy-making apparatuses, placing geopolitical considerations above journalistic integrity.

An analysis of The Washington Post’s coverage of the Israeli war on Gaza reveals a fundamental flaw that goes beyond editorial details to the construction of the media narrative itself. The coverage has exposed a stark linguistic and ethical discrepancy in reporting Israeli attacks on Palestinian civilians—particularly hospitals, shelters, and aid centers—versus coverage of similar (or less destructive) Iranian strikes on Israeli facilities, as in the case of Soroka Hospital. In the absence of critical self-assessment, such institutions are likely to reproduce the same narrative frameworks—cementing language as a tool of bias rather than truth.

 

Related Articles

Western Media Bias and Complicity with Israel is Beyond Borders

Once again, Western media framed civilians within the context of "collateral damage" while covering Israeli attacks on Syria. The language of international law was absent, and the tragedy of civilians affected by military strikes was completely obscured, while justifications and cover for the occupation prevailed under the banner of "maintaining national security."

Zainab Afifa
Zainab Afifa Published on: 23 Mar, 2025
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

The article highlights how over 1,500 journalists are speaking out against Western media's biased coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict, criticizing its dehumanizing language, lack of context, and disproportionate focus on Israeli narratives at the expense of Palestinian voices and journalistic integrity.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Failing Gaza: Pro-Israel Bias Uncovered Behind the Lens of Western Media

Journalists at CNN and the BBC expose the inner workings of their newsrooms, a year into Israel’s war on Gaza.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 8 Oct, 2024
Atrocity Inc.: What Max Blumenthal's New Documentary Reveals About Western Media's Complicity in Israeli Propaganda

A digest of Max Blumenthal's new documentary, Atrocity Inc., in which he uncovers how the Israeli PR machinery and propaganda efforts were carefully and intentionally designed to manufacture consent for a campaign of mass death against Palestinians. It reveals how the Western media, especially in the United States, supported Israel's misinformation war.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 13 Oct, 2024
The Sharp Contrast: How Israeli and Western Media Cover the War on Gaza

Despite being directly governed by Israeli policies, some Israeli media outlets critically report on their government’s actions and use accurate terminology, whereas Western media has shown complete bias, failing to be impartial in its coverage of Israel’s aggression in Gaza.

Faras Ghani Published on: 5 Mar, 2025
The Sharp Contrast: How Israeli and Western Media Cover the War on Gaza

Despite being directly governed by Israeli policies, some Israeli media outlets critically report on their government’s actions and use accurate terminology, whereas Western media has shown complete bias, failing to be impartial in its coverage of Israel’s aggression in Gaza.

Faras Ghani Published on: 5 Mar, 2025
Journalist Testimonies on Western Media Coverage of the Gaza War: The Other Narrative

In this article, we compile testimonies from journalists who have criticised their own media institutions as documented in reports, letters, or interviews. Most spoke anonymously out of fear of repercussions—because freedom of expression appears protected only until it reaches the borders of Israel. At that point, constraints emerge, editorial policies shift, and the system of double standards is activated.

Al Jazeera Journalism Review
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 29 Mar, 2025

More Articles

In the War on Gaza: How Do You Tell a Human Story?

After nine months of genocidal war on Palestine, how can journalists tell human stories? Which stories should they focus on? And does the daily, continuous coverage of the war’s developments lead to a “normalisation of death”?

Yousef Fares
Yousef Fares Published on: 8 Jul, 2025
How Much AI is Too Much AI for Ethical Journalism

As artificial intelligence transforms newsrooms across South Asia, journalists grapple with the fine line between enhancement and dependency

Saurabh Sharma
Saurabh Sharma Published on: 1 Jul, 2025
How to Tell the Stories of Gaza’s Children

Where does compassion end and journalism begin? How can one engage with children ethically, and is it even morally acceptable to conduct interviews with them? Palestinian journalist Reem Al-Qatawy offers a profoundly different approach to human-interest reporting. At the Hope Institute in Gaza, she met children enduring the harrowing aftermath of losing their families. Her experience was marked by intense professional and ethical challenges.

Rima Al-Qatawi
Rima Al-Qatawi Published on: 26 Jun, 2025
Do Foreign Journalists Matter in Covering Genocide? A Look into Bosnia, Rwanda, and Gaza

How did foreign journalists cover the killings in both Bosnia-Herzegovina and Rwanda? Did they contribute to conveying the truth and making an impact? Would the entry of foreign journalists into the Gaza Strip change the reality of the ongoing genocide? And would their coverage of the famine and massacres add to the daily coverage of local journalists? Why is the local press's coverage of wars seen as deficient compared to Western journalism, even though they incur greater losses and casualties?

Saber Halima
Saber Halima Published on: 20 Jun, 2025
How Palestine Is Forcing Journalists to Reexamine Objectivity and Decolonize

This article argues that the Palestinian context exposes the colonial roots of traditional journalism and calls for a decolonial approach that centers marginalized voices, promotes collaborative reporting, and demands structural change within newsrooms to uphold journalistic integrity.

Sanne Breimer
Sanne Breimer Published on: 12 Jun, 2025
The Role of Social Science Tools in Enhancing Journalism

When French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu was asked about the contribution of the suburbs to elections, he replied that decades of colonialism and complex problems cannot be summarised in 10 minutes. The value of social sciences in supporting journalism is demonstrated when they address issues of society, power, and identity for the sake of better journalism.

Rehab Zaheri
Rehab Zaheri Published on: 6 Jun, 2025
Digital Dependency: Unpacking Tech Philanthropy’s Grip on Local News in the MENA

AI-driven journalism initiatives in the Middle East, often backed by philanthropic media development projects, are reshaping local newsrooms under the influence of global tech giants. These efforts, while marketed as support, risk deepening power asymmetries, fostering digital dependency, and reactivating colonial patterns of control through algorithmic systems and donor-driven agendas.

Sara Ait Khorsa
Sara Ait Khorsa Published on: 3 Jun, 2025
Journalism Colleges in Somalia: A Battle for Survival

Journalism colleges in Somalia are struggling to survive due to outdated curricula, lack of practical training, insufficient funding, and a shortage of qualified educators, leading to declining student enrollment and interest. Despite efforts by institutions like Mogadishu University and Hormuud University to revive journalism education, these challenges persist, threatening the future of journalism in the country.

Al-Shafi Abtidon
Al-Shafi Abtidon Published on: 30 May, 2025
Philippine Activists Fight Archive Erasure and Revive Dictatorship-Era Memories

In the Philippines, archivists fight to preserve evidence of the country’s bloodied past, in hope that it will provide lessons for the future.

Tristan James Biglete
Tristan James Biglete Published on: 27 May, 2025
News Fatigue and Avoidance: How Media Overload is Reshaping Audience Engagement

A study conducted on 12,000 American adults revealed that two-thirds feel “exhausted” by the overwhelming volume of news they receive. Why is the public feeling drained by the news? Are audiences actively avoiding it, and at what psychological cost? Most importantly, how can the media rebuild trust and reconnect with its audience?

Othman Kabashi
Othman Kabashi Published on: 25 May, 2025
Weaponized Artificial Intelligence: The Unseen Threat to Fact-Checking

How has artificial intelligence emerged as a powerful tool during wartime, and what strategies are fact-checkers adopting to confront this disruptive force in newsrooms? The work of fact-checkers has grown significantly more challenging during the genocide in Palestine, as the Israeli occupation has relied heavily on artificial intelligence to disseminate misinformation.

Ahmad Al-Arja
Ahmad Al-Arja Published on: 18 May, 2025
Reporting from the Ruins; Why We Must Keep Myanmar’s Journalists Alive and Online

In Myanmar, journalism has become a courageous act of resistance. As the military junta tightens its grip on information, journalists face growing technological, political, and security barriers. This article explores the urgent need to support Myanmar’s embattled media workers before the country slides into a full information blackout.

Annie Zaman
Annie Zaman Published on: 13 May, 2025
Palestinian Journalist Lama Ghosheh Refuses to Be Silenced Under Occupation

Despite ongoing repression under Israeli occupation, Palestinian journalist Lama Ghosheh continues her work with unwavering resolve, documenting the lived realities of her people. Her story is one of resistance, family, and the high cost of speaking truth in the face of systemic silencing.

Synne Furnes Bjerkestrand
Synne Bjerkestrand Published on: 9 May, 2025
The Media Landscape in Sudan During the War

The ongoing war in Sudan has dismantled many media institutions, creating a vacuum filled by a vast stream of rumors and false information that has fueled internal conflict. A large segment of the public has turned to social media platforms in search of the truth, while some traditional media outlets continue to operate despite the targeting of their offices and journalists.

Mohammed Babiker Al-Awad
Mohammed Babiker Al-Awad Published on: 2 May, 2025
Western Media’s Double Standards on Muslim Women’s Suffering

When an Iranian student publicly protested against security forces by undressing, the moment garnered widespread attention in Western media. Meanwhile, even as 70 percent of those killed in Palestine are women and children, this ongoing violence—including the systematic killing, torture, and detention of Palestinian women—receives minimal coverage. This disparity raises urgent questions: How do Western media represent women’s issues in the Islamic world, and to what extent are such portrayals shaped by double standards?

Shaimaa Al-Eisai
Shaimaa Al-Eisai Published on: 24 Apr, 2025
Western Media Has Failed Their Palestinian Colleagues

A 2024 CPJ report revealed that nearly 70% of journalists killed that year were targeted by Israel, yet major Western media outlets largely ignored or downplayed the findings. The muted response to these targeted attacks and escalating press restrictions highlights a troubling double standard in the West’s commitment to press freedom.

Assal Rad
Assal Rad Published on: 21 Apr, 2025
Weaponizing the Law: SLAPPs Against Journalists and Press Freedom

SLAPPs—abusive lawsuits designed to silence journalists and activists—are surging across Southeast Asia, exploiting vague laws and weak protections to punish those who speak truth to power. As legal harassment intensifies, journalists face not only imprisonment and censorship but also emotional trauma, exile, and long-term damage to their careers.

AJR Contributor Published on: 17 Apr, 2025
Predicting the Future of Media in 2025

The rise of citizen journalism, the rethinking of long-form content, the evolution of video, and the exploration of AI opportunities are key elements of the media landscape forecast for 2025, according to a report from Harvard University's Nieman Lab.

Othman Kabashi
Othman Kabashi Published on: 15 Apr, 2025
Revisioning Journalism During a Genocide

Western media’s coverage of the Gaza genocide has revealed fundamental cracks in the notion of journalistic objectivity. Mainstream outlets have frequently marginalized or discredited Palestinian perspectives, often echoing narratives that align with Israeli state interests. In stark contrast, Palestinian journalists—reporting from within a besieged landscape—have become frontline truth-tellers. Through raw, emotional storytelling, they are not only documenting atrocities but also redefining journalism as a form of resistance and a reclaiming of ethical purpose.

Ana Maria Monjardino
Ana Maria Monjardino Published on: 4 Apr, 2025
How Media Drives Collective Adaptation During Natural Disasters in Oman

This paper highlights how Omani media, during times of natural disasters, focused on praising government efforts to improve its image, while neglecting the voices of victims and those affected by the cyclones. It also examines the media’s role in warning against and preventing future disasters.

Shaimaa Al-Eisai
Shaimaa Al-Eisai Published on: 31 Mar, 2025
Systematic Bias: How Western Media Framed the March 18 Massacre of Palestinians

On March 18, Israel launched a large-scale assault on Gaza, killing over 412 Palestinians and injuring more than 500, while Western media uncritically echoed Israel’s claim of “targeting Hamas.” Rather than exposing the massacre, coverage downplayed the death toll, delayed key facts, and framed the attacks as justified pressure on Hamas—further highlighting the double standard in valuing Palestinian lives.

Mei Shigenobu مي شيغينوبو
Mei Shigenobu Published on: 18 Mar, 2025
Misinformation in Syria: Natural Chaos or Organised Campaign?

Old videos inciting “sectarian strife,” statements taken out of context attacking Christians, scenes of heavy weaponry clashes in other countries, fabricated stories of fictitious detainees, and a huge amount of fake news that accompanied the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime: Is it the natural chaos of transition or a systematic campaign?

Farhat Khedr
Farhat Khedr Published on: 11 Mar, 2025
Trump and the Closure of USAID: A Candid Conversation on "Independent Media"

The impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to halt foreign funding through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) on Arab media platforms has largely gone undiscussed. Some of these platforms have consistently labelled themselves as "independent" despite being Western-funded. This article examines the reasons behind the failure of economic models for Western-funded institutions in the Arab world and explores the extent of their editorial independence.

Ahmad Abuhamad Published on: 9 Mar, 2025
The Sharp Contrast: How Israeli and Western Media Cover the War on Gaza

Despite being directly governed by Israeli policies, some Israeli media outlets critically report on their government’s actions and use accurate terminology, whereas Western media has shown complete bias, failing to be impartial in its coverage of Israel’s aggression in Gaza.

Faras Ghani Published on: 5 Mar, 2025