Al Jazeera Journalism Review

outside image
An Indian Muslim prepares for Friday prayers during Ramadan at the Mecca Masjid in Hyderabad, India, on Friday, May 7, 2021, when the COVID pandemic was still in full force. Misinformation linking Muslims to the spread of coronavirus were compounded by false stories from news agencies such as ANI, which is partly funded by Thomson Reuters [Mahesh Kumar/AP]

Why is a Western news organisation funding propaganda in India?

ANI, the world’s largest source of Indian news, receives funding from Thomson-Reuters, despite widespread condemnation for its misinformation about Muslims


We all put our trust in the international news agencies which alert us of breaking news over the wires every day.

Perhaps the most famous of these is Thomson Reuters, a news agency known around the world as a trusted source of unbiased, factual news coverage. And, for the most part, this is exactly what it is.

But in India, Reuters is actively helping to fund and distribute false, propagandistic and, at times, anti-minority news coverage through its “strategic partnership” with and financial backing of another news agency which does not adhere to its principles of “independence, integrity, and freedom from bias”: Asia News International (ANI).

Founded in 1971, ANI has in recent years quoted from non-existent sources and fabricated think tanks. An investigation into ANI’s sourcing practices by the Belgian non-profit organisation EU Disinfo Lab ( shows how such disinformation transfers with ease to major mainstream news outlets.

India disinfo1

ANI has also issued “news” accusing Muslims of crimes they did not commit - such as when it tweeted, apparently quoting the deputy commissioner of the police (DCP) in Gautam Budh Nagar, saying that people in Harola, Noida who had come into contact with Tablighi Jamaat members had been quarantined. The story was part of a fake news drive linking members of the Islamic scholarly group with a new outbreak of COVID in India. It was quickly debunked, however, with the DCP stating that people had been quarantined as a matter of procedure and it had nothing to do with Tablighi Jamaat whatsoever.

ANI has also been shown to have strong connections with the Modi government, while its senior staff often offer simpering support for Modi himself. So tight is the relationship between ANI and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in India, that the political party sometimes pays for the company to livestream party speeches, hiring out news organisation employees as if they were wedding photographers. In 2019, ANI tweeted out the following headline from West Bengal, with no quotes to indicate that the same lines had just appeared in a BJP twitter account: “The BJP shall bring glory back to Bengal. This is what a real speech from a real leader sounds like.” 

According to the Indian investigative outlet, The Caravan, which spoke with numerous former ANI staffers, ANI also partners with Indian government ministries to create video content advancing their chosen political messages. Former ANI staffers allege that they were ordered by management to under-report the death tolls of Indian military strikes in Kashmir, The Caravan reported in the same article. 

ANI’s cosy relationship with Modi’s (BJP) is worrisome. Equally, its close links to the political offshoot of the right-wing, Hindu nationalist paramilitary organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). 

ANI routinely presents BJP politicians as if they are neutral observers of political affairs or eyewitnesses to events, who, conveniently, just happen to often criticise parties and politicians opposing the BJP. Reuters support has helped ANI to manufacture this illusion of ordinary citizens spouting BJP talking points.

As one of the largest distributors of Indian news to global television channels, ANI’s coverage plays a central role in presenting India’s global image. Meanwhile, Reuters is a major financial backer - at one point owning a 49 percent financial stake in ANI. While it later reduced its share in order to comply with Indian government regulations, Reuters continues to be a major backer. 

It does so despite of a chorus of criticism and condemnation from around the world, ranging from a scathing report on ANI’s practices from a damning investigation by France’s Le Monde, to a letter from Indian military veterans, urging Reuters to reconsider its partnership with ANI in light of the latter’s deliberate distortion of facts which made it seem as if the BJP had more support than it did on a crucial military policy debate. 

According to The Caravan’s report, Reuter’s own staffers have criticised ANI’s reporting. Former Reuters producer Siddharth Dubey told The Caravan: “The [Reuters] London newsroom complained about the quality. We rewrote the scripts, top to bottom. We did our own fact checking. Every Christmas time, Reuters was close to pulling out. But ANI is the only one who will give footage from everywhere in India.”

The decision to fund ANI is not simply a matter of supporting a few harmless “untruths”. ANI’s misreporting has fed into broader conspiratorial media cycles that have fuelled anti-Muslim sentiment and even violence in India. 

Indian media outlets regularly transmit false evidence of the so-called “Love Jihad” and  “Corona Jihad” conspiracy theories, the first of which advances the idea that Muslim men entrap Hindu women to convert them to Islam, while the second blames Muslims for the spread of COVID-19.

ANI has contributed to this broader reporting trend, falsely connecting a Muslim man to a shocking rape case in conflict-torn Manipur this year. In that case, ANI was forced to make a retraction and apologise in a Tweet for its “mistake”.

Indis disinfo2

In this case and that of the false story about Tablighi Jamaat members spreading COVID, ANI’s reporting provoked hundreds of Islamophobic remarks from online commenters and possibly many more from the thousands of news consumers who read about the cases in other media outlets which had relayed ANI reports before it issued the correction. 

These ANI “stories” have undeniably contributed to anti-Muslim sentiment throughout the country. 

On other occasions, ANI has even quoted people who do not even appear to exist. It has extensively cited James Duglous (sic) Crickton, Magda Lipan (sometimes spelled Magad Lipan, or Magda Lipin), and Valentin Popescu in articles circulated to millions of readers. The only problem, as the EU Disinfo Lab found, is that none of these people appear to exist. 

The same goes for a think tank called the International Forum for Rights and Security (IFRAS), a Canadian organisation that was formally dissolved in 2014, but which nonetheless claims to have hosted a 2020 academic conference on the “rise of the Muslim Brotherhood”. ANI quotes from this think tank approximately twice a week, according to EU Disinfo Lab. 

So why does Thomson Reuters continue to be so closely connected to the news agency?

Despite multiple requests for comment by Al Jazeera Journalism Review, Thomson Reuters did not respond to explain. 

Deep regime ties, quoting non-existent entities, sloppy and false reporting that has fuelled anti-minority sentiment - none of these practices align with Reuters’ own. If Reuters would not tolerate such misconduct in its own newsrooms, it shouldn’t bankroll it either. In continuing to do so, despite strenuous opposition, it actively harms readers around the world as well as Indian minorities.

Morley Musick is a freelance journalist and editor-in-chief of the international literary magazine Mouse Magazine


The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance




More Articles

How Latin American media echoes Israeli discourse in reporting Gaza news

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict: Biased reporting and controversial journalistic stances

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023
Victims of the Mediterranean: ‘Migrants’ or ‘Refugees’?

The term ‘migrant’ insufficient to describe victims of the horror unfolding in the Mediterranean Sea; it dehumanises these people and is a failure of journalism

A picture of the author, Mohammad Ahdad.
Mohammad Ahdad Published on: 2 Oct, 2023
How do we determine 'newsworthiness' in the digital age?

The relentless flow of news in the digital age has re-shaped the parameters by which we decide what is 'news' and what is not

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 11 Sep, 2023
‘Focus on the story, not the storyteller’ - the dilemma of a diaspora journalist

When reporting on their homelands, diaspora journalists walk a fine line between emotional connection and objective storytelling

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 4 Sep, 2023
Why does Arab media fail so badly at covering refugee issues?

Arabic media discourse on refugees and migrants frequently aligns too closely with the Western narrative, often spreading fear of migrants while emphasising the burdens of asylum

A picture of the author, Ahmad Abu Hamad
Ahmad Abu Hamad Published on: 28 Aug, 2023
What does Zimbabwe’s new ‘Patriot Bill’ mean for journalists?  

As Zimbabwe heads into elections this week, a new law dubbed the ‘Patriot Bill’ will further criminalise journalism

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 21 Aug, 2023
Verify everything: What I learned from covering the Qatar World Cup 

Last year’s FIFA World Cup in Qatar was not the flop so many in the Western media predicted it would be. It taught me one thing - verify everything!

Noe Zavaleta Published on: 8 Aug, 2023
How do we determine ‘newsworthiness’?

Digital media and the algorithms used by platforms to determine the news they send out to their audiences have fundamentally changed the face of news planning

Mohammed Shazly Published on: 24 Jul, 2023
What Zimbabwe’s news rooms must learn from global media closures

A flourishing media needs more than just capital and a few good ideas - it needs innovation  

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Jul, 2023
Journalists beware! The silly season is upon us

With parliaments on recess and all the movers and shakers off on their holidays, journalists can find themselves scrabbling about for any old news to report. But be careful what you resort to

Ilya U Topper Published on: 3 Jul, 2023
Guatemalan media needs to talk about the consequences of corruption

The media in Guatemala has a responsibility to demonstrate how corruption affects people’s human rights

Jorge Sagastume Published on: 26 Jun, 2023
Donald Lu is dangerously wrong - India does not have a ‘free press’

The US must stop whitewashing Prime Minister Modi’s crackdown on Indian journalists

Safa Ahmed Published on: 20 Jun, 2023
Sudan shows us why Africans must tell their own conflict stories

Africa lacks freedom of expression because its stories are told by others

Philip Obaji Jr
Philip Obaji Jr Published on: 1 Jun, 2023
What happened when I asked ChatGPT to write my article

It got quite a lot right, and quite a lot very, very wrong

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 22 May, 2023
Shireen Abu Akleh’s forgotten murder

Over the past year, many in the media profession in the US have deliberately chosen to forget the assassination of their colleague

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 11 May, 2023
The correspondent's job: Ask people, don't tell them

Should foreign correspondents and their media organisations ever take a stand on another country’s political divisions?

Ilya U Topper Published on: 8 May, 2023