Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Haroon
When the author, a middle-class Sunni-Muslim Pakistani, interviewed a Hindu priest - such as the priest pictured here at the Shri Hinglaj Mata Temple in Balochistan province - he came to understand how his position of privilege in relation to his interviewee would influence the interview and the resulting story. [REUTERS/Akhtar Soomro]

When journalists are blind to their privilege, the ‘true’ story may not be told

It took me years to see how my privilege would influence the outcome of interviews with minority Hindus in Pakistan. This ‘positionality’ is something journalists should pay closer heed to.

 

My longest interview to date lasted for 10 hours, spread over five sittings of two hours each. The interview was with a Hindu priest at a historical temple in Lahore, Pakistan. 

Whereas once there had been hundreds of Hindu temples all over Lahore, there were now only two functioning ones when I was conducting this interview, more than 10 years ago.

The majority of these temples had been abandoned at Partition, when Lahore experienced violent communal riots between Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims that led to the migration of the Hindu and Sikh community from the city, and the rest of the province, to India. At the time of Partition, the population of the Hindu community in the city was almost at par with the Muslim community. Now it is negligible enough to not even warrant a separate category in the census reports.

The interview was eye-opening and shaped my understanding of the lived experiences of the Hindu community in Pakistan. It was a detailed first-person account of everyday violence, an unimaginable sense of marginalisation and micro-aggression; a story of how the post-Partition Pakistani identity manifested itself on the bodies of Hindu minorities. 

In this nationalist worldview, Pakistan is associated with a Muslim identity, and India with Hindu. The complex politics of pre-Partition British-India are reduced to a simplistic narrative that Hindus and Muslims could not live together, that Hindus wanted to oppress Muslims in an independent India, which is why there was a need to create a Muslim Pakistan. 

The Pakistani State has promoted this worldview over the years through political rhetoric, the education curriculum and nationalist media. 

The life-story of the priest that he so generously shared with me, was the story of how this macro-perspective finds its way into the behaviours and attitudes of the majority community population, and how that shapes their interactions with the minorities, particularly Hindus.

During the course of this interview, something that really stood out for me was the interviewee’s need to convince me of his patriotism, of his love for Pakistan, and his insistence on living in Pakistan despite everything. 

This was also a time when many Hindu families were migrating to India, forced to do so due to the socio-political situation here in Pakistan. At that time, I found this reiteration monotonous, a needless detail to an otherwise intense interview. In my eyes, it was peripheral information in relation to the “core” story. Over the years, as I find myself thinking back to that interview, I am increasingly convinced that this was perhaps the most important part of the interview, something that I failed to notice at the time.

As journalists, we are trained to believe that we are not part of the story, that we are silent, objective observers of events who, despite being present, are not meant to be present. 

I was not a neutral observer: The priest was responding to my questions in a particular way because of who he perceived me to be

 

Seen through this perspective, my interview with the priest was not about me, but about him, his stories, his experiences. My experiences and background were meant to be irrelevant. But is that even possible? Can an intimate interaction between two individuals – an interviewee and interviewer happen without the experiences and the backgrounds of one of them entering the space? 

As a journalist, I am inclined to say yes, that my experiences have nothing to do with the context of that interview, but that would show how unaware I am of how my presence is eliciting a particular response from the interviewee, how it is shaping their answers and how that would eventually shape the story I would write. 

What then emerges from an interview is not the story of an interviewee, but the story of an interviewee told to a particular interviewer, whose very existence prompted certain aspects of the story to be told, and not others.

I am an upper-middle class Punjabi, Sunni, male, cis-gendered, straight Pakistani. In other words, I am as mainstream as one expects to be in this society. My identity aligns most neatly with the Pakistani identity, the norm, through which all other identities are measured and defined. The further away an individual or a community is from this identity, the more systemically marginalised it is likely to be. A working-class middle-aged Punjabi Hindu priest is quite far from this core, normative identity, that I represent.

During the course of the interview, while I was blind to this privilege, the priest of course was not. I can say all of these things, criticise the treatment of the Pakistani State of its Hindu minorities, challenge other State policies without my patriotism being questioned. It is in fact a major reason why I have been able to work with religious minorities and write about their history and heritage in the country for over a decade. A middle-aged Hindu priest from Lahore doesn’t have that privilege. The moment he talks about these issues, his patriotism will be questioned. He will be asked to leave Pakistan and go to India. Even worse, he can become a victim of mob violence, of which there are several examples.

There were many moments in the interview where the priest talked about all of these issues openly. He talked about how, after Partition, many Hindus in Lahore had to change their names into Muslim or Christian-sounding names to hide their identities. He talked about how several people still regard Hindus to be impure and don’t share utensils with them, a tradition that has its roots in the casteist concept of ‘untouchability’ in South Asia. He talked about how for many years, the Hindu minority did not dare celebrate their religious festivals, even within the sanctuary of their temple for fear of a backlash. They had to do so within closed rooms. He talked about how the temple was attacked in December 1992, as a reaction to the demolition of Babri Masjid in India. He told me how the temple was burnt and how several Hindu families, including that of the priest had to remain underground for several months after, fearing for their lives.

In that 10-hour-long interview, he talked about all of these issues without reservation. But scattered within these anecdotes were also stories of his, and the Hindu community’s love for the country. He wanted to remind me that his criticism of these practices doesn’t mean that he hated Pakistan, that his loyalty did not lay on the other side of the border, as Hindu minorities are often accused of.

Our positionality is something that we as journalists have to think about more deeply, particularly in complex stories, in contested spaces, where there are multiple 'truths'

 

Now that I reflect back on the interview, I wonder if the priest felt it was necessarily to couch his stories of marginalisation with statements of love for Pakistan, given my identity as a Sunni-Muslim Pakistani. 

I was not a neutral observer for the priest, and the space of the interview was not a safe space. We were still in Pakistan, and I was part of the majority community that has, over the years, exerted its right over the State and the country by exhibiting violence over religious minorities. In that space, it is easy for me to imagine myself as an objective journalist, far removed from the experiences of the priest, but doing that would be ignoring my positionality and the privilege that comes with it.

The priest was responding to my questions in a particular way because of who he perceived me to be. The interview was, therefore, not a one-way process of storytelling, but a story that was told as a response to my presence, my positionality and my background. The story would have been different, if it was a different journalist - a Hindu or a Sikh journalist, for example. The “objective truth” of the priest’s life story that would have emerged from that interaction would have been different from the “objective truth” that emerged as a result of his interaction with me.

Our positionality is something that we as journalists have to think about more deeply moving forward. How does our presence shape the interaction? How does the interviewee perceive our background or positionality and how does that shape their answers? Particularly in complex stories, in contested spaces, where there are multiple “truths”, these questions are extremely important because they will determine what part of the story we get to hear, how that story is told and what our role as journalists in telling that story ought to be.

 

Haroon Khalid is a writer and journalist from Lahore, based in Toronto, Canada.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance

 

 

More Articles

International media has abandoned Afghanistan

The international community will be vital in helping Afghanistan to survive Taliban rule - but it has to start with a change of approach by Western media

Sayed Jalal
Sayed Jalal Shajjan Published on: 22 May, 2022
Let’s help refugees escape from the media’s ‘Ghetto of Compassion’

We must not lump all migrants and asylum seekers together when we report about refugees - ignoring nuance doesn’t solve problems

Alejandro
Alejandro Luque Published on: 15 May, 2022
The occupation of Palestine is not a conflict of equal sides - media needs to start telling the truth

Western media's response to the killing of veteran journalist Shireen Abu Akleh by Israeli forces in Palestine is shameful. Until the media starts reporting the truth about Israeli brutality in Palestine, the killing of journalists doing their jobs will continue

Nina Montagu-Smith
Nina Montagu-Smith Published on: 11 May, 2022
The US is on its way to criminalising journalism

Billed as a ‘super fact checker’, Joe Biden’s new ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ is the first step on this path

Martin Jay
Martin Jay Published on: 9 May, 2022
Beware of activist journalists - they won’t always tell the ugly truth

It is the job of journalists to report the full truth - even when that might cast the ‘good’ guys in a ‘bad’ light

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 25 Apr, 2022
Bangladesh’s Digital Security Act is criminalising journalism

Bangladesh has been quietly strengthening its laws curtailing freedom of expression - with dangerous results

Rokeya
Rokeya Lita Published on: 18 Apr, 2022
Moscow’s journalistic lights are dimmed, but their story needs to be told

Russia is waging a war on independent journalists who dare to question or contradict the official government line - we must do more to support them

Aidan
Aidan White Published on: 7 Apr, 2022
Why healthy democracies need news junkies

Studies show that news junkies are more likely to register to vote and be politically engaged, but they are not better at predicting future events

Justin
Justin D Martin, Krishna Sharma Published on: 3 Apr, 2022
We need more raw coverage of conflict zones to make people care about all refugees

Coverage of Ukrainian refugees has been more sympathetic because it is usually accompanied by images of the crisis they are fleeing

Tomasz
Tomasz Lesniara Published on: 27 Mar, 2022
Facebook is showing its double standards over freedom of speech

Hate speech is a bad idea. A good idea would be for platforms to show consistency in their content moderation, particularly when it comes to Palestine

A picture of the author, Abeer alNajjar
Abeer Al-Najjar Published on: 17 Mar, 2022
When women are being smeared - listen to what they are saying

Cassandra was cursed to always see the future, but to never be believed. For female journalists like Carole Cadwalladr, long dismissed as a 'mad cat lady', it’s a familiar tale

Nina Montagu-Smith
Nina Montagu-Smith Published on: 16 Mar, 2022
Zimbabwe’s Fourth Estate is under siege

With few job opportunities, harassment by the authorities and a global pandemic, the picture for balanced and truthful journalism is not a pretty one

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Mar, 2022
The irony of fake news - sometimes it serves to highlight injustice

Last week, the image of a blonde-haired Palestinian girl standing up to an Israeli soldier was wrongly credited as an image of a Ukrainian girl confronting a Russian soldier. The intention was to garner sympathy for Ukraine - instead, it had a rather different outcome

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 6 Mar, 2022
‘You must know how to haggle!’ - racism in journalism starts in the classroom 

Even though I didn’t choose to, I quickly became that one ‘annoying’ journalist of colour who had to keep mentioning racism in my journalism school. It was humiliating and exhausting, to the point of nearly quitting

Azraa
Azraa Muthy Published on: 24 Feb, 2022
Human rights lessons from a ‘terrorist’ journalist

It has ever been the case that when a journalist reports crimes by a despot, militant group or even, these days, a so-called democratic state, he is liable to be labelled a criminal.

Clive Stafford Smith
Clive Stafford Smith Published on: 30 Jan, 2022
How should we talk about Pakistan?

How do journalists report accurately about a country which suffers sectarian violence without reinforcing Islamophobic tropes?

Haroon Khalid
Haroon Khalid Published on: 24 Jan, 2022
'Both sides’ journalism does not always show us the truth

Journalists are bound to tell the truth, not give platforms to positions which are demonstrably wrong in a misguided attempt to be ‘impartial’.

Sakhr2
Sakhr Al-Makhadhi Published on: 17 Jan, 2022
Forget superheroes - science journalists will save the world

Science journalism is not just about test tubes, it's about everything. And the past few years have shown that the world needs science journalists more than ever before.

Osama
Osama Abu El Rub Published on: 16 Jan, 2022
The media must stop obsessing about ‘economic migrants’

The use of the term ‘economic migrants’ to describe desperate people trying to find a better life for themselves and their families conceals the reality of the brutality they face at Europe’s borders.

Lucy Papachristou Published on: 13 Dec, 2021
Life as a journalist on a US ‘kill list’

The US continues to shroud policies for the ‘War on Terror’ behind a veil of secrecy. This undermines democracy and a free press, and means no justice for one American journalist who claims he has been targeted for assassination on five separate occasions, nor for countless civilian casualties of US drone attacks.

Pauline Canham
Pauline Canham Published on: 28 Nov, 2021
No, you are NOT the story

A writer reflects on the absurdity - and naivety - of journalists who place themselves at the centre of the stories they cover.

Noe
Noe Zavaleta Published on: 21 Nov, 2021
It’s time to put an end to ‘parachute’ journalism

While global media organisations continue to fly in their own correspondents, relying on local journalists only for translation and ‘fixing’, the world will never get to know the real stories happening in the Global South.

Dina Aboughazala
Dina Aboughazala Published on: 7 Nov, 2021
Julian Assange and Wikileaks are no model for responsible journalism

Punishing journalists who publish leaked information is an assault on democracy, but journalists still need to handle such information with care and integrity.

JulieB
Julie Bindel Published on: 31 Oct, 2021
Why I’ve had to launch my own magazine about Pakistan

Western media is full of negative stereotypes about my birth country. My job as a diaspora journalist is to challenge those tired old tropes.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 12 Oct, 2021