Al Jazeera Journalism Review

outside image
Police escort investigative journalist Rozina Islam to a court in Dhaka, Bangladesh on May 18, 2021, a day after being arrested on charges of stealing documents and taking images by the health ministry. [Syed Mahamudur Rahman/NurPhoto via Getty Images]

Bangladesh’s Digital Security Act is criminalising journalism

Bangladesh has been quietly strengthening its laws curtailing freedom of expression - with dangerous results


In 1930s Germany, it was a criminal act to listen to “enemy broadcasters” from overseas. Anyone caught flouting this law faced imprisonment in a concentration camp. Today, Russian journalists referring to the invasion of Ukraine as a “war” - or defying the official Russian narrative at all - face 15 years in prison.

Controlling the media - and demonising journalists who don’t toe the “correct” line - is nothing new. It has been adopted by rulers across the world throughout history - and not just by dictators. 

Bangladesh is just one supposedly democratic country, where the law is coming dangerously close to making journalism a crime.

The Government of Bangladesh is currently planning to introduce yet another new set of laws under the banner of the “Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission Regulation for Digital, Social Media and OTT Platforms”, a draft of which was published in February this year. 

A total of 45 international organisations have called on the government to withdraw it amid concerns over freedom of expression

This is just the latest step in Bangladesh’s long road towards curtailing freedom of speech, adding to the already existing, draconian 2018 Digital Security Act.

These digital security laws did not spring out of a vacuum. The Information and Communication Technology Act, which was passed in 2006 under the BNP-Jamaat government, was used to arrest more than 1,200 people. It has been actively used by all parties, not just BNP-Jamaat. Not only did the Awami League-led government make ample use of this draconian law, it amended the act in 2013 to clamp down on free speech on the internet even more.

There was widespread criticism over the misuse of Section 57 of the ICT Act by different human rights groups and civil societies. Section 57 of the Act authorises prosecution of anyone who publishes, in electronic form, material deemed fake, obscene, defamatory, or any material that “tends to deprave or corrupt” its audience. It also allows for prosecution if content may “cause hurt to religious beliefs”.

Dissident writer Mushtaq Ahmed was arrested for posting comments on social media about the government’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. He died in prison


The law is vague and open to interpretation. Photographer Shahidul Alam was arrested under Section 57 of the ICT act and spent 107 days in jail. He was charged with “spreading rumours” against the government for criticising the government's handling of a road safety protest over the death of two school students in a road accident. 

But rather than revise its authoritarian approach, the Bangladesh government ramped up its efforts to curtail free speech even more in 2018, when it introduced the new Digital Security Act (DSA). 

The DSA now includes life imprisonment for offenders, and uses terms and provisions which are excessively broad and open to interpretation. 

Section 25 of the Act criminalises “spreading information with an intention to affect the image or reputation of the country or to spread confusion”. This is so broad and unspecific that it could very well target journalists who are deemed to not be doing enough to enhance the “image or reputation of the country”.

For example, the United States has sanctioned RAB officials over its handling of human rights in Bangladesh. This information certainly affects the image of the country, and the DSA empowers anyone to file a case against any journalist who merely states the facts on any online media. 

The DSA also allows the authorities to arrest anyone, search their premises and seize any equipment without any judicial approval. 

Dissident writer Mushtaq Ahmed was arrested in May 2020 on charges of violating the DSA for posting comments on social media about the government’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. Police charged Ahmed with spreading rumours on social media, tarnishing the image of the country’s founding father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and “hurting the spirit of the 1971 liberation war”. His application for bail was denied six times. 

He died in the country’s high-security Kashimpur jail after languishing there for nine months without trial. According to media reports, Mushtaq Ahmed was tortured in police custody. Cartoonist Ahmed Kabir Kishore, who was also imprisoned after posting satirical cartoons on Facebook, also claimed he had been tortured in custody. 

While the DSA targets critical voices on social media and other digital platforms, mainstream media and journalists are not safe from the Act. The Centre for Governance Studies (CGS) tracked a total of 890 charges under DSA from January 2020 to March 3, 2022, and found that 8.6 percent were brought against mainstream journalists. 

Journalists warned about the potential ramifications of the Act from the very beginning. The Editor’s Council in Bangladesh raised its concerns about the Act during meetings with the government, warning that it would harm freedom of expression.

A 15-year-old child was arrested for 'defaming' the prime minister in a Facebook post. He was held in a juvenile detention centre 


The DSA is not the only tool with which the Government of Bangladesh keeps journalists in check. One of the most discussed cases in the recent times was the arrest of the prestigious Free Press award winner journalist, Rozina Islam, in May 2021 under the country’s 100-year-old Official Secrets Act and the Penal Code. 

She was held for more than five hours by government officials for allegedly reporting on corruption in the health sector of Bangladesh during the coronavirus pandemic. Later, officials handed her over to police and brought charges against her for “stealing and photographing of sensitive state documents”, which have never before been used against journalists in Bangladesh since the country’s independence in 1971.

The Digital Security Act ensures non-bailable penalties for at least 14 offences and section 28 of the act criminalises opinions that upset religious sentiments. This law gives licence to arrest anyone who merely reports on this issue. 

The law has been taken to extremes. In 2020, a 15-year-old child was arrested for “defaming” the prime minister in a Facebook post. The child was accused of having “badmouthed our mother-like leader”.

He was held in a juvenile detention centre to spend time “realising his mistakes and correcting his character”.

As if this isn’t heavy handed enough, the focus of the new “Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission Regulation for Digital, Social Media and OTT Platforms” law is to govern content on all digital platforms even more strictly using traceability, network neutrality, truncated timelines for content removal and “codes of ethics”.

The ultimate result will be self-censorship by those posting any sort of content online. The question is - why does the government seek “digital safety” so desperately and who is it really for?  

Rokeya Lita is a Bangladeshi novelist and journalist currently based in the UK


The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance


More Articles

How Latin American media echoes Israeli discourse in reporting Gaza news

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict: Biased reporting and controversial journalistic stances

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023
Victims of the Mediterranean: ‘Migrants’ or ‘Refugees’?

The term ‘migrant’ insufficient to describe victims of the horror unfolding in the Mediterranean Sea; it dehumanises these people and is a failure of journalism

A picture of the author, Mohammad Ahdad.
Mohammad Ahdad Published on: 2 Oct, 2023
Why is a Western news organisation funding propaganda in India?

ANI, the world’s largest source of Indian news, receives funding from Thomson-Reuters, despite widespread condemnation for its misinformation about Muslims

Morley Musick Published on: 18 Sep, 2023
How do we determine 'newsworthiness' in the digital age?

The relentless flow of news in the digital age has re-shaped the parameters by which we decide what is 'news' and what is not

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 11 Sep, 2023
‘Focus on the story, not the storyteller’ - the dilemma of a diaspora journalist

When reporting on their homelands, diaspora journalists walk a fine line between emotional connection and objective storytelling

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 4 Sep, 2023
Why does Arab media fail so badly at covering refugee issues?

Arabic media discourse on refugees and migrants frequently aligns too closely with the Western narrative, often spreading fear of migrants while emphasising the burdens of asylum

A picture of the author, Ahmad Abu Hamad
Ahmad Abu Hamad Published on: 28 Aug, 2023
What does Zimbabwe’s new ‘Patriot Bill’ mean for journalists?  

As Zimbabwe heads into elections this week, a new law dubbed the ‘Patriot Bill’ will further criminalise journalism

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 21 Aug, 2023
Verify everything: What I learned from covering the Qatar World Cup 

Last year’s FIFA World Cup in Qatar was not the flop so many in the Western media predicted it would be. It taught me one thing - verify everything!

Noe Zavaleta Published on: 8 Aug, 2023
How do we determine ‘newsworthiness’?

Digital media and the algorithms used by platforms to determine the news they send out to their audiences have fundamentally changed the face of news planning

Mohammed Shazly Published on: 24 Jul, 2023
What Zimbabwe’s news rooms must learn from global media closures

A flourishing media needs more than just capital and a few good ideas - it needs innovation  

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Jul, 2023
Journalists beware! The silly season is upon us

With parliaments on recess and all the movers and shakers off on their holidays, journalists can find themselves scrabbling about for any old news to report. But be careful what you resort to

Ilya U Topper Published on: 3 Jul, 2023
Guatemalan media needs to talk about the consequences of corruption

The media in Guatemala has a responsibility to demonstrate how corruption affects people’s human rights

Jorge Sagastume Published on: 26 Jun, 2023
Donald Lu is dangerously wrong - India does not have a ‘free press’

The US must stop whitewashing Prime Minister Modi’s crackdown on Indian journalists

Safa Ahmed Published on: 20 Jun, 2023
Sudan shows us why Africans must tell their own conflict stories

Africa lacks freedom of expression because its stories are told by others

Philip Obaji Jr
Philip Obaji Jr Published on: 1 Jun, 2023
What happened when I asked ChatGPT to write my article

It got quite a lot right, and quite a lot very, very wrong

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 22 May, 2023
Shireen Abu Akleh’s forgotten murder

Over the past year, many in the media profession in the US have deliberately chosen to forget the assassination of their colleague

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 11 May, 2023