Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Outside image
Police officers arrest a woman during a protest by the Just Stop Oil environmental group on August 26, 2022 in London, England. Last year, police also arrested several journalists who were covering the protests [Leon Neal/Getty Images]

Why are British police arresting journalists?

UK police forces increasingly regard criticism from the media as a ‘war on policing’. Journalists are being harassed, accused of crimes and arrested as a result

 

The frayed relationship between the British police and media has come under increasing strain in the last couple of years, as law enforcement officials continue to adopt aggressive tactics that shut down reporting. Not only have cops repeatedly threatened to arrest journalists at protests, but they’ve actually sought those individuals out - at home - to unlawfully detain them, simply for reporting on these demonstrations.

Tensions peaked when LBC reporter Charlotte Lynch was arrested while covering a Just Stop Oil protest in November 2022. It emerged that a total of four journalists had been locked up by Hertfordshire Police that week alone, following orders by top officers. Despite holding no affiliation with the protest group, these reporters were detained on suspicion of conspiracy to commit a public nuisance: a new offence introduced as part of the Police, Crime Sentencing and Court Act in April 2022 and carrying up to 10 years in prison.

None of the journalists was charged with a criminal offence, a task that falls to Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service which is independent of the police.

On the day of Lynch’s arrest, Hertfordshire’s Police and Crime Commissioner David Lloyd stated that the news coverage of the protest was “adding flames to the fire” then said that reporters should “deny them [protestors] the oxygen of publicity”. He claimed: “The reason that Just Stop Oil is continuing to do this is that they know they will get publicity,” adding: “Frankly, [the protestors] have got exactly what they want by having front page news using their name every single day.”

The timing of these controversial comments raises the question of whether police deliberately arrested the journalists to silence media reporting of the protest itself and the violent tactics used to suppress activists.

Britain’s leaders are quick to condemn human rights abuses abroad: Rishi Sunak heavily criticised Chinese police for arresting a BBC journalist at a Shanghai protest that same month. But perhaps he forgot that four reporters were arrested in near-identical circumstances less than an hour’s drive from Downing Street?

Britain’s own police are exceptionally hostile to public scrutiny and criticism: decades of empirical studies come to this undeniable conclusion. They’ve been arresting and physically assaulting journalists who report on corruption for years. Not to mention sending married male spy cops to have fake relationships with female protestors.

With extremely high levels of organisational solidarity, the country’s police force is very isolated from the citizens it purportedly serves. Cops often take an “us versus them” approach to divisions in society. The net result is a siege mentality whereby rank-and-file officers all-too-frequently respond angrily - and even violently - to negative feedback from the public.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak heavily criticised Chinese police for arresting a BBC journalist at a Shanghai protest. Perhaps he forgot that four reporters were arrested in near-identical circumstances less than an hour’s drive from Downing Street?

 

These problematic aspects of British policing culture present a very real threat to personal safety for journalists on the ground. A significant proportion of England and Wales’ 164,000 police officers are so convinced that citizens are constantly trying to attack their profession that they have come to care only about protecting themselves. Firmly ensconced in a sub-culture that glorifies violence and aggression, their immediate response to scrutiny is to arrest the reporter in question, in many cases physically assaulting them and raiding their homes.

Tom Bowles was one of the four journalists arrested at the Just Stop Oil protests that week. Hertfordshire Police decided his mere presence warranted one of the most intrusive powers of the state: a house raid. Cops woke his wife and daughter at 11pm, so they could search the entire property from top to bottom - seizing electronic devices, including his child’s iPad - while he was still locked up.

This was no isolated incident.

Police have searched my house - without charging me with a criminal offence - twice in the past two years. Six men from the South West Regional Organised Crime Unit raided my property before dawn in December 2020, while I was alone with my one-year-old. The officer-in-charge admitted knowing I’m a journalist and even brought along a machine to download the contents of my electronic devices, in the hope I’d be foolish enough to provide the passcodes. I’m yet to uncover exactly why they visited, as they refused to leave a copy of their search warrant.

A few months later, seven Devon and Cornwall Police officers appeared on my doorstep with a Section Eight search warrant. I pointed out that this particular warrant didn’t allow them access to the property, but a male officer punched and kicked me before forcing me to the ground and handcuffing me. His colleagues searched the house and unlawfully seized all my confidential journalism material including a work laptop, iPhone, two audio recorders and notebooks. 

I was extremely upset as this sensitive material included hours of audio recorded interviews with vulnerable heroin user-dealers, carried out as part of a multi-agency harm reduction initiative. My laptop and phone also contained documents from identifiable police whistleblowers.

Throughout the search, I was shocked at the officers’ overt hostility. Two of the men repeatedly told me they “hate journalists” and said “get a proper job where you contribute to society”. When I failed to respond to their comments, they angrily called me “rude” and “arrogant” for ignoring them. And when I pointed out that they weren’t allowed to take my confidential journalism, the officer-in-charge said merely: “I don’t care.” He even threatened to strip-search me if I mentioned the subject again.

Police have searched my house - without charging me with a criminal offence - twice in the past two years

 

Like Hertfordshire Police, who made the laughable claim that journalists wouldn’t be aware of a protest if they weren’t involved, Devon and Cornwall Police claimed to mistake my journalism for evidence of involvement in drug supply. They interviewed me under caution and alleged my court reporting was a list of my own personal drug transactions. A judge later ruled that the police acted unlawfully, yet we ended up attending three court hearings, as the officers stubbornly failed to return the journalistic material as per their legal obligations.

 

Cops harass journalists online

With the internet a reflection of societal trends, you can clearly observe this animosity towards journalists on social media. A cursory glance at Twitter, where numerous British cops hold accounts, shows that thousands of serving officers view external criticism as akin to a “war on policing”. Bosses and trade unions aggressively defend heavy-handed protest tactics, dangerous restraint techniques and lethal weaponry, while directing large volumes of abuse at reporters who question them.

These powerful opinion leaders adopt a victim narrative whereby rank-and-file officers are the persecuted party in debates on police brutality, racism and misogyny. They claim the “thin blue line” is a misunderstood and besieged minority group - suffering hugely - to protect society against rabble-rousing protestors, harmful immigrants and “police-hating” journalists.

Senior law enforcement figures increasingly use their personal social media accounts to dominate and shape public discourse on law enforcement. They frequently label critical reporters as “anti-police” or “agenda-driven”, all dog whistles to a certain kind of cop. Within hours, there are usually thousands of offensive responses to the journalist in question.

 

Silencing critical journalists

As a journalist, deviating from the police’s desired narrative often feels like a David-and-Goliath contest. England and Wales’ police had a budget of £15,877 million in the financial year ending March 2022, with London’s Metropolitan Police alone spending more than £10 million on media relations. The National Association of Police Chiefs spent £350,000 on a single Instagram account with 19,400 followers and 732 posts that same year.

Press officers are hostile to journalists who report on law enforcement failures. The manager of the Metropolitan Police press office telephoned me in April 2022 and asked me to delete a tweet whereby I’d publicly asked a police chief a difficult question. In response to my refusal, he said the Metropolitan Police would “sue me for libel” - an act that isn’t possible under British case law - unless I removed the question.

Last year, a Metropolitan Police press officer informed me that she needed my home address, date of birth and other personal information, after I offered her a straightforward right of response to a British tabloid news article. She claimed that the force keeps these details “on file” for all reporters and declined to respond when I refused to provide such personal detail.

The police interviewed me under caution and alleged my court reporting was a list of my own personal drug transactions

 

I’m always asked to explain my “agenda” or “angle” when making an inquiry. But it should make no difference to the press officer: they should reply politely and helpfully regardless. The reality, of course, is that this question is a thinly-veiled attempt to find out whether you intend to write a positive article or perhaps something more reflective of the sorry state of British policing.

Though opposition politicians blame the ruling Conservative party for reducing journalistic freedom, the sad reality is that this issue persists no matter who rules the country: the police locked up countless journalists for reporting on the huge anti-war protests that characterised the Blair years.

Britain’s police have a well-documented history of labelling mainstream media journalists as “domestic extremists” for reporting on political protests and campaigns. There are many reported instances of officers using anti-terrorism legislation to record journalists’ conversations or to stop-and-search them.

Each year, officers are asked to inform bosses whether they know any news reporters, as they do with “convicted criminals” or “extremists”. It’s clear there’s a longstanding perception among the country’s law enforcement chiefs that journalists are unsavoury - or potentially disreputable - individuals for employees to associate with.

So though it’s tempting to argue that the Police, Crime and Sentencing Bill makes it easier for cops to arrest journalists at protests, the reality is that - for an organisation that’s determined to prevent scrutiny of its actions - it’s simply one of many readily-available tools for silencing reporters. Unfortunately, the real issue in police-media relations is much deeper and thus more difficult to solve: it lies with a problematic law enforcement culture and not the legislation.

Rebecca Tidy is a freelance journalist specialising in public and social policy, with a focus on prisons, drugs and nationalism

 

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance

 

More Articles

Ethical Dilemmas of Photo Editing in Media: Lessons from Kate Middleton’s Photo Controversy

Photoshop—an intelligent digital tool celebrated for enhancing the visual appearance of photographs—is a double-edged sword. While it has the power to transform and refine images, it also skillfully blurs the line between reality and fiction, challenging the legitimacy of journalistic integrity and the credibility of news media.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 26 Mar, 2024
Monitoring of Journalistic Malpractices in Gaza Coverage

On this page, the editorial team of the Al Jazeera Journalism Review will collect news published by media institutions about the current war on Gaza that involves disinformation, bias, or professional journalistic standards and its code of ethics.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 25 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
The Perils of Unverified News: A Case of Nonexistent Flotillas

Can you hide one thousand ships in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea? I would say not. But some of my fellow journalists seem to believe in magic.  

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 16 Jan, 2024
In the Courtroom and Beyond: Covering South Africa's Historic Legal Case Against Israel at The Hague

As South Africa takes on Israel at the International Court of Justice, the role of journalists in covering this landmark case becomes more crucial than ever. Their insights and reporting bring the complexities of international law to a global audience.

Hala Ahed
Hala Ahed Published on: 12 Jan, 2024
Did the NYTimes Manipulate the Sexual Violence Allegations of October 7?

An in-depth examination of the New York Times's investigation of alleged sexual assaults by Hamas during the Israeli war on Gaza, highlighting ethical concerns, and the impact of its reporting on the victims' families. It questions the journalistic integrity of the Times, especially in the context of Western media's portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 7 Jan, 2024
Is The New York Times Reproducing Allegations of 'Sexual Violence' to Downplay Israeli Crimes?

The New York Times' report on alleged sexual violence by Palestinian militants raises profound concerns about discrepancies in key testimonies and a biased reporting that aligns with Israeli narratives and downplays Israeli crimes in Gaza.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 31 Dec, 2023
Embedded journalism: Striking a balance between access and impartiality in war zones

The ethical implications of embedded journalism, particularly in the Israeli invasion of Gaza, raise concerns about the compromise of balance and independence in war coverage.

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 19 Dec, 2023
Through a Mexican lens: Navigating the intricacies of reporting in Palestine

A Mexican journalist's journey through the complexities of reporting on Palestine and gives tips on how to manage this kind of coverage.

Témoris Grecko
Témoris Grecko Published on: 10 Dec, 2023
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan
Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno
Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha
Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Mitrovica
Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023
Victims of the Mediterranean: ‘Migrants’ or ‘Refugees’?

The term ‘migrant’ insufficient to describe victims of the horror unfolding in the Mediterranean Sea; it dehumanises these people and is a failure of journalism

A picture of the author, Mohammad Ahdad.
Mohammad Ahdad Published on: 2 Oct, 2023
Why is a Western news organisation funding propaganda in India?

ANI, the world’s largest source of Indian news, receives funding from Thomson-Reuters, despite widespread condemnation for its misinformation about Muslims

MM
Morley Musick Published on: 18 Sep, 2023