Al Jazeera Journalism Review

outside image
The newsroom at the Washington Post. The way news is selected is changing with the growth of social media platforms and digital news outlets [Shutterstock]

How do we determine ‘newsworthiness’?

Digital media and the algorithms used by platforms to determine the news they send out to their audiences have fundamentally changed the face of news planning


What makes an event newsworthy? This question has preoccupied researchers in media studies for decades and the attempts to find its answer will not cease anytime soon. It’s linked to inevitable changes that are either ideological and social, political or which are down to changes in media outlets - or a mixture of these.

This question may seem elusive. To answer it, we need to unpick the journalistic system, especially in an environment as fluid as the news. While news does not occur in a vacuum - somewhere outside people’s lives - it is a journalist or editor who decides if an event is notable enough to be in the news or if a story deserves to be told. 

In their 1965 study on the structure of foreign news, Johan Galtung and Mary Ruge presented criteria by which newspapers select news, including whether an event is “negative”, whether it is “unexpected” and whether it is centred around “states and dignitaries”.

This study became a foundational approach to defining and determining “journalistic guidelines” and what is considered “newsworthy”. But Galtung himself said that his study ought to serve as a warning about selecting news in this manner and should not serve as a practical guide to the correct approach.

In my opinion, the essence of Galtung’s theory is that it considers that every gatekeeper, who decides whether an event is newsworthy, is in direct contact with the events. This means that a journalist or reporter, in such cases, is considered the primary source of news. As a result, for decades, Galtung’s criteria, which were repeatedly criticised and scrutinised, were akin to a form of traditional media that does not consider the criteria set for new digital platforms.

The digital platforms introduced a new type of media staff who produce the initial surge of news in a way that goes beyond the usual journalistic system. Digital blogs and Twitter (in their early days) may have presented this revolutionary form of journalism in its first steps. 

As media outlets expanded and with the formation and development of digital platforms, many individuals in the media field found they no longer belonged to the primary category of the news industry (correspondents, agencies and journalists). Rather, they belonged to a secondary category that deals with the initial surge of news in an editorial, explicit, critical or even cynical manner. This new category presented a wider ground for news selection. However, having a vast surge of news to choose from is inevitably accompanied by a new difficulty in setting the criteria for determining “newsworthiness”.

Despite all these complexities that change and shape the criteria for selecting journalistic content, many journalists and their institutions prefer a single word to express the most important criterion for selecting journalistic content: Impact!


Impact or influence?

The Office of Strategic Marketing and Communications at the University of Nebraska, Omaha defines “impact” as the most important journalistic criterion for newsworthiness. An example it provided can be described as follows: “Imagine researchers have found a cost-effective solution to a common problem. The more people affected, the greater the news interest”.

Digital platforms, however, take a different stance since influence is naturally unrelated to impact when it comes to the journalistic definition of newsworthiness. Nevertheless, some use both words interchangeably in cyberspace and might mix their functions.

In my opinion, the influence that digital platforms refer to has a fickle meaning that aims to create swirls of interaction with news. The aim is to attract the largest number of followers possible and achieve the highest number of interactions. Impact, on the other hand, has a more rigid meaning which refers to change; to bring about change, even a minor one.

The previous metaphor shows that massive waves of influence on digital platforms are not necessarily transformative. Some of them will not achieve any change (impact) even as they achieve “significant numbers” of hits because they are just a disturbance awaiting new turbulence to overwhelm them. The real impact of something changes something in structure or offers a “solution”, even if it is small.

How is this related to evaluating journalistic content? One method is to use what digital media calls “performance metrics”. 

Performance metrics are a set of numbers generated by equations and algorithms used by specific platform operators. They ultimately express the content performance on a platform and are divided according to platform type and content into different metrics. These metrics include the numbers of views, likes, comments, posts, minutes viewed, retention rate and sometimes the rewatches count.

Corporate media overwhelm us with news from certain regions. This brainwashes viewers into believing that this news is of paramount importance even if it contradicts their own values


Content makers seek to create a suitable recipe for these metrics in the digital world. This recipe is often a mixture of the platform's directives, data analysts’ expectations and imaginative perceptions of what could happen.

Much of the gatekeeping burden, therefore, has been shifted to companies controlling platforms, content and publishers, despite their assertion that dissemination and “content success” depend on the “audience community”. 

It’s as if society creates a natural movement of content dissemination akin to “the invisible hand”. It’s the public who watches, interacts, comments and admires certain content over another. The numbers speak for themselves.

In 2021, a large number of internal documents were submitted to the United States Congress about Facebook and revealed much about the platform, its management and the reality of algorithms. 

The Washington Post showcases how Facebook's algorithms deliberately circulate posts that evoke an angry interaction via the famous angry emoticon on its newsfeed. It was found that Facebook had the ability to nurture feelings of anger and actively contributed to the spread of false and misleading information. Examples of the seriousness and impact of these decisions on several communities was provided.

Digital platforms have made no secret of the way they handle identical content in different contexts. This proves that performance metrics alone are insufficient as criteria for assessing newsworthiness. 

For example, we can compare how Meta and its platforms, Facebook and Instagram, suppressed news of the aggression against the occupied Gaza in May 2021 and how it circulated the news of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The examples are more than what can be counted in an article, but this proves what Galtung said about the criteria mentioned in his study. Furthermore, any observer of digital platforms can perceive how they nurture feelings of anger, negativity and polarisation.


Towards a clear definition of newsworthiness?

Our conclusions do not necessarily mean that the existence of guidelines for journalistic content is impossible in the digital world. They simply show that these guidelines must be set in a positive way rather than acting as a mere response to how platform metrics change and alter according to a particular platform’s agendas and decisions. Guidelines must be set in consideration of the nature of the platforms while taking into account that the journalist, editor and chief editor are not the only gatekeepers of news.

The path towards a solution starts with the realisation of the nature of evolving journalistic work on digital platforms. There must be a conviction that the traditional concept of journalistic guidelines is insufficient (although necessary) to assess digital content in light of the reasons shown in this article.  

The next step is for corporate media, media platforms, independent journalists or even content makers to develop an assessment plan. This plan is obligatory and should include various components that represent the basis on which content can be evaluated. What is proposed in this article is what several researchers and specialists recommend in terms of how these criteria should be divided into three groups: journalistic guidelines, content standards and platform guidelines. 

The journalistic guidelines should be the top priority for evaluating journalistic content. Although these guidelines are intuitive and central in the journalistic process, they are often absent from content evaluation metrics and are limited to planning sessions. And since corporate media rely on limited news sources, they overwhelm us with specific coverage and news from certain regions. This brainwashes viewers into believing that this news is of paramount importance even if it contradicts their own values.

The guidelines of corporate media represent the charter that links it to its audience. It represents its circles of interest and mission, its promise to society and the anticipated benefit. Insofar as the media content is consistent with its guidelines, public loyalty is built and its role is entrenched.

The next step of evaluation is looking at the content standards, namely the accuracy of journalistic material through reliance on primary or reliable sources. It also includes verification of information using several means, side readings, discussions with specialists and the protection of sources and their privacy. This criterion helps in delivering the intended benefit and for it to stand out amidst a pool of poor content.

The importance of this criteria, in my opinion, is that it offers a map of the trends in digital platforms to help journalists present their original content properly and achieve dissemination among their target audiences. 

Mohammed Shazly is a Senior Producer at AJ+ Arabic




More Articles

How AI Synthesised Media Shapes Voter Perception: India's Case in Point

The recent Indian elections witnessed the unprecedented use of generative AI, leading to a surge in misinformation and deepfakes. Political parties leveraged AI to create digital avatars of deceased leaders, Bollywood actors

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 12 Jun, 2024
The Rise of Podcasting: How Digital Audio Is Revolutionising Journalism

In this age of digital transformation and media convergence, podcasts stand out as a testament to the enduring power of journalism—a medium that transcends borders, sparks conversations, and brings the world closer together.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 6 Jun, 2024
Under Fire: The Perilous Reality for Journalists in Gaza's War Zone

Journalists lack safety equipment and legal protection, highlighting the challenges faced by journalists in Gaza. While Israel denies responsibility for targeting journalists, the lack of international intervention leaves journalists in Gaza exposed to daily danger.

Linda Shalash
Linda Shalash Published on: 9 May, 2024
Your Words Are Your Weapon — You Are a Soldier in a Propaganda War

Narrative warfare and the role of journalists in it is immense; the context of the conflict, the battleground has shifted to the realm of narratives, where journalists play a decisive role in shaping the narrative.

Ilya U Topper Published on: 21 Apr, 2024
The Privilege and Burden of Conflict Reporting in Nigeria: Navigating the Emotional Toll

The internal struggle and moral dilemmas faced by a conflict reporter, as they grapple with the overwhelming nature of the tragedies they witness and the sense of helplessness in the face of such immense suffering. It ultimately underscores the vital role of conflict journalism in preserving historical memory and giving a voice to the voiceless.

Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu
Hauwa Shaffii Nuhu Published on: 17 Apr, 2024
Journalism in chains in Cameroon

Investigative journalists in Cameroon sometimes use treacherous means to navigate the numerous challenges that hamper the practice of their profession: the absence of the Freedom of Information Act, the criminalisation of press offenses, and the scare of the overly-broad anti-terrorism law.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 12 Apr, 2024
The Perils of Journalism and the Rise of Citizen Media in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia's media landscape is grim, with low rankings for internet and press freedom across the region. While citizen journalism has risen to fill the gaps, journalists - both professional and citizen - face significant risks due to government crackdowns and the collusion between tech companies and authorities to enable censorship and surveillance.

AJR Contributor Published on: 6 Apr, 2024
Orientalism, Imperialism and The Western Coverage of Palestine

Western mainstream media biases and defence of the Israeli narrative are connected to orientalism, racism, and imperialism, serving the interests of Western ruling political and economic elites. However, it is being challenged by global movements aiming to shed light on the realities of the conflict and express solidarity with the Palestinian population.

Joseph Daher
Joseph Daher Published on: 1 Apr, 2024
Ethical Dilemmas of Photo Editing in Media: Lessons from Kate Middleton’s Photo Controversy

Photoshop—an intelligent digital tool celebrated for enhancing the visual appearance of photographs—is a double-edged sword. While it has the power to transform and refine images, it also skillfully blurs the line between reality and fiction, challenging the legitimacy of journalistic integrity and the credibility of news media.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 26 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
The Perils of Unverified News: A Case of Nonexistent Flotillas

Can you hide one thousand ships in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea? I would say not. But some of my fellow journalists seem to believe in magic.  

Ilya U Topper Published on: 16 Jan, 2024
In the Courtroom and Beyond: Covering South Africa's Historic Legal Case Against Israel at The Hague

As South Africa takes on Israel at the International Court of Justice, the role of journalists in covering this landmark case becomes more crucial than ever. Their insights and reporting bring the complexities of international law to a global audience.

Hala Ahed
Hala Ahed Published on: 12 Jan, 2024
Did the NYTimes Manipulate the Sexual Violence Allegations of October 7?

An in-depth examination of the New York Times's investigation of alleged sexual assaults by Hamas during the Israeli war on Gaza, highlighting ethical concerns, and the impact of its reporting on the victims' families. It questions the journalistic integrity of the Times, especially in the context of Western media's portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 7 Jan, 2024
Is The New York Times Reproducing Allegations of 'Sexual Violence' to Downplay Israeli Crimes?

The New York Times' report on alleged sexual violence by Palestinian militants raises profound concerns about discrepancies in key testimonies and a biased reporting that aligns with Israeli narratives and downplays Israeli crimes in Gaza.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 31 Dec, 2023
Embedded journalism: Striking a balance between access and impartiality in war zones

The ethical implications of embedded journalism, particularly in the Israeli invasion of Gaza, raise concerns about the compromise of balance and independence in war coverage.

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 19 Dec, 2023
Through a Mexican lens: Navigating the intricacies of reporting in Palestine

A Mexican journalist's journey through the complexities of reporting on Palestine and gives tips on how to manage this kind of coverage.

Témoris Grecko
Témoris Grecko Published on: 10 Dec, 2023
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023