Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Bias towards ideology at the expense of truth... Look for the reasons

Donald Trump’s election as US President in 2016 may have represented a key shift in the issue of ‘fake news’. Trump – whose election came as a surprise to everyone – found himself the target of a vast campaign from media supportive of the Democratic Party and the American Left more broadly. It did not take him long to launch his own counter-attack, accusing the media of deliberately fabricating ‘fake news’ that cast him in a negative light.

Regardless of your opinion on Trump, it is important to recognise that in today’s world fake news are being disseminated on a massive scale. There are many reasons for this.

One of these reasons is that it has become entirely accepted – and widespread to the point of habit – for media to have well-known and openly stated ideological biases. Media outlets that define themselves as objective sources for the transmission of news have become exceptional, or at the very least a minority. Outlets now typically have an open and well-known ideological line: left or right, conservative or liberal, nationalist or globalist, etc.

The media argue that this is not a problem in itself so long as outlets keep to the standards of media work and truthfulness. The problem is that it is difficult to draw the line between a media outlet having a particular angle driving its editorial policy and this angle meaning that outlet deletes, highlights, marginalises, amplifies or underplays specific pieces of news.

The media argue that this is not a problem in itself so long as outlets keep to the standards of media work and truthfulness.

This is apart from the growing political and ideological polarisation within a given society, reflected in turn on media that become part of that polarisation. It is only to be expected that all outlets will become embroiled in this struggle to a certain extent and try to focus on news, analysis, reports and opinion that support their ideological inclinations. Within this polarisation, it becomes very difficult to keep to professional standards. In fact, those who still advocate for these standards come to be accused of having an outdated idea of professionalism or an ethical cold-bloodedness in a fierce struggle many consider a matter of life and death.

So it is that we find ourselves in the so-called ‘Post-Truth Era’, by which is meant a situation in which truth, data and information play an increasingly limited role in favour of ideological beliefs and desires. We should note here that although it is true that post-truth can encompass a neglect for fact and a dismissal of verified information, many of the issues that humans disagree on – politically, culturally, socially – are not the sort of thing that can be decided conclusively by data. A left-winger, for example, might believe that a growing number of people with no health insurance is a warning sign and something that the media should focus on. A rightist, meanwhile, even assuming they conceded the numbers, would not take the same view: they would argue that is down to individuals to work hard in order to get decent health insurance, meaning that the issue is not, as far as they are concerned, any cause for alarm.

Moreover, humans have a strong psychological tendency to believe things that support their existing beliefs, so-called ‘confirmation bias’. This seems logical: believing something that supports my pre-existing opinion is psychologically easier and less costly. When I am confronted by information, news or analysis that contradicts my opinion, this produces cognitive dissonance, the uncomfortable feeling produced by a new fact that radically shakes your idea of a particular issue and makes that idea seem limited, mistaken, or brittle.

It is logical then that we would prefer news, people and media that support our ideas on issues that are important to us, and that we would avoid news, people and media that do the opposite. A polarised environment of flagrant bias is a welcoming one for fake news. Intense polarisation is accompanied by a climate in which emotions run high, reactions come thick and fast and the other is demonised and portrayed as a threat. These feelings and reactions must be given justification. And if real news does not serve this end, fake, exaggerated or highly biased news becomes a pressing psychological need for both media outlets and consumers.

Social media, of course, has contributed dramatically to the phenomenon of fake news
Social media, of course, has contributed dramatically to the phenomenon of fake news. There are several reasons for this:

1) Growing demand for news: production and consumption

The emergence of CNN as the first channel broadcasting nothing but news heralded the end of a time when news came only at particular hours. With social media, news became a constant, unceasing torrent available at any moment. Media and news platforms require a high rate of traffic, and need to preserve and expand their audience via continuous polarisation of new consumers. Consumers are likewise in constant contact with social media and need constant ‘feeding’. The simultaneous need of both producer and consumer for a non-stop flow of news lays the foundation for complacent publishing, for insufficient verification, and for the transformation of reactions to and comments on news into stories in their own right. This creates an atmosphere in which fake news spreads very easily.

2) The vicious circle of ‘engagement’

The concept of ‘engagement’ is key to an understanding of the relationship of social media and news. Engagement measures the extent to which followers engage with content on media networks by the amount of time that followers spend with that content – for example, commenting, sharing or sending to others. There is important evidence that followers are most engaged when afraid or angry. Psychologically, this seems easy to explain. When people are afraid, they are constantly alert to danger in order to assess and confront it and search for safety and peace of mind. Angry people are likewise in a constant state of stimulation that feel a strong desire to give vent or expression to, connecting in various ways with those they consider the causes of their anger.

To take a simple example, news about immigrants in the West are the object of non-stop attention from media and consumers. The explanation is simple. Anti-immigrant discourse focuses on the crimes they commit, the jobs they take, and the alarming new cultures they bring with them. They play to both fear and anger, and in doing so ensure themselves a high degree of engagement.

In a climate like this where both media and consumers are so keen on remaining connected to events, neither has a clear interest in verifying and carefully and soberly considering news. Fake news – especially that which stimulates anger or fear – win immediate interest and are believed instantly and with little effort.

3) Moral anxiety

As it becomes ever more difficult to appeal to reasonable standards on which a consensus can be formed when discussing issues that concern the humans of today, the ‘manufacturing of reactions’ to issues acquires great importance. It is now common for any issue that is the subject of controversy to produce sharp polarisation, with the two sides exchanging accusations of racism, unpatrioticness or extremism. This is what is meant by the term ‘moral panic’: on every issue, people are good or evil, enemies or allies, with us or against us. Through the power of the media, even minor issues and issues that it is entirely reasonable for good people to disagree on become crucial matters of life and death, of patriotism or betrayal, of backwardness or civilisation. In this sort of environment, it is easy to believe anything that hurts or embarrasses the other team or makes mine look good – without thinking about balanced debate or objective examination of the issues.

This environment is very welcoming to the production, promotion and belief of fake news. It is no exaggeration to say that dealing with this issue is one of the greatest challenges facing the media today. It is also one of the greatest challenges facing media consumers. The important question is: how can we preserve our balance and objectivity in forming their opinions on events, issues and people? 

 

More Articles

Is Pakistan’s Media Ignoring Climate Change?

Pakistan's media, despite its wide reach, largely neglects climate change in favor of political and economic issues, leaving the public under-informed about the causes and consequences of climate-related disasters. As a result, many Pakistanis remain unaware of the growing threats posed by climate change, which has devastating effects on the country's economy and population, as seen in the catastrophic floods of 2022.

Faras Ghani Published on: 3 Dec, 2024
Fact or Fiction? Quantifying the 'Truth' in True-Crime Podcasts

Over the centuries, true crime narratives have migrated across mediums—from tabloids and books to documentaries, films, and, most recently, podcasts. Despite these evolutions, one constant endures: the storytellers’ drive to detail the darkest corners of human behaviour and the insatiable curiosity of their audiences.

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 28 Nov, 2024
Gender Inequity in Sports Reporting: Female Journalists Demand Equality

Gender inequality persists in sports journalism, with female reporters significantly under-represented, as shown by studies revealing that only 5.1% of sports articles are written by women. Advocates call for equal representation, more inclusive hiring practices, and a broader focus on women's sports to challenge stereotypes, improve coverage, and give women a stronger voice in shaping sports narratives.

Akem
Akem Nkwain Published on: 18 Nov, 2024
How Does Misinformation Undermine Public Trust in Journalism?

Reports reveal a growing loss of trust in the media, driven by the extent of misinformation that undermines professional journalism's ability to influence public discourse. The platforms of misinformation, now supported by states and private entities during conflicts and wars, threaten to strip the profession of its core roles of accountability and oversight.

Muhammad Khamaiseh 1
Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 13 Nov, 2024
What Explains the Indian Media’s Silence on Muslim Lynchings?

A review of why the Indian media is biased in its coverage of cow vigilantes' lynchings, highlighting how the killing of a Hindu boy by such vigilantes sparked widespread outrage, while the lynching of a Muslim man over similar allegations was largely ignored, reflecting deeper anti-Muslim bias under the ruling BJP government.

Saif Khaled
Saif Khalid Published on: 11 Nov, 2024
Freedom of the Press in Jordan and Unconstitutional Interpretations

Since the approval of the Cybercrime Law in Jordan, freedom of opinion and expression has entered a troubling phase marked by the arrest of journalists and restrictions on media. Musab Shawabkeh offers a constitutional reading based on interpretations and rulings that uphold freedom of expression in a context where the country needs diverse opinions in the face of the Israeli ultra right wing politics.

Musab Shawabkeh
Musab Al Shawabkeh Published on: 8 Nov, 2024
More than 230 Media Professionals Call on BBC to Recommit to Fairness, Accuracy, and Impartiality in its Gaza Coverage

Over 230 members of the media industry, including more than 100 BBC employees, have signed a letter to BBC Director General Tim Davie accusing the BBC of being biased in its coverage of Israel's war in Gaza.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 3 Nov, 2024
Corporate Dominance and the Erosion of Editorial Independence in Indian Media

Corporate influence in Indian media has led to widespread editorial suppression, with media owners prioritising political appeasement over journalistic integrity, resulting in a significant erosion of press freedom and diversity in news reporting.

headshot
AJR Correspondent Published on: 3 Nov, 2024
MSNBC Deletes Interview with Journalist Criticising Western Media’s Bias Towards Israeli Narrative

MSNBC deleted an interview with journalist Jeremy Scahill after he criticised American media’s biased portrayal of Israeli actions in Gaza, condemning the framing of civilian casualties as "self-defence." Scahill argued that any discussion of Gaza’s leaders must address the broader context of occupation and longstanding injustices faced by Palestinians.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 27 Oct, 2024
Monitoring of Journalistic Malpractices in Gaza Coverage

On this page, the editorial team of the Al Jazeera Journalism Review will collect news published by media institutions about the current war on Gaza that involves disinformation, bias, or professional journalistic standards and its code of ethics.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 23 Oct, 2024
Voting in a Time of Genocide

The upcoming U.S. presidential election occurs against the backdrop of the ongoing genocide in Gaza, with AJ Plus prioritising marginalised voices and critically analysing Western mainstream media narratives while highlighting the undemocratic aspects of the U.S. electoral system.

Tony Karon Published on: 22 Oct, 2024
Journalists Should Not Embrace the Artificial Intelligence Hype

What factors should journalists take into account while discussing the use of AI in the media?

Jorge Sagastume Muralles
Jorge Sagastume Published on: 16 Oct, 2024
Atrocity Inc.: What Max Blumenthal's New Documentary Reveals About Western Media's Complicity in Israeli Propaganda

A digest of Max Blumenthal's new documentary, Atrocity Inc., in which he uncovers how the Israeli PR machinery and propaganda efforts were carefully and intentionally designed to manufacture consent for a campaign of mass death against Palestinians. It reveals how the Western media, especially in the United States, supported Israel's misinformation war.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 13 Oct, 2024
Failing Gaza: Pro-Israel Bias Uncovered Behind the Lens of Western Media

Journalists at CNN and the BBC expose the inner workings of their newsrooms, a year into Israel’s war on Gaza.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 8 Oct, 2024
A Half-Truth is a Full Lie

Misinformation is rampant in modern conflicts, worsened by the internet and social media, where false news spreads easily. While news agencies aim to provide unbiased, fact-based reporting, their focus on brevity and hard facts often lacks the necessary context, leaving the public vulnerable to manipulation and unable to fully grasp the complexities of these issues.

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 30 Sep, 2024
Guns, Threats, and Poverty: The Daily Struggles of an African Journalist

The welfare of African journalists continues to deteriorate, from poor wages to security risks, arrests, detention, and even death. This common, ongoing trend generally affects the wellbeing of journalists during their discharge of duties, and these overlooked difficulties tend to affect the quality and output of their work.

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 26 Sep, 2024
How to Bring more Balance to Western Media Coverage of Israel and Palestine

How can journalists accurately cover Palestine without becoming unbalanced or biased? Here are some concrete tools and techniques for reporters to keep in mind.

A picture of the author, Megan O'Toole
Megan O'Toole Published on: 16 Sep, 2024
Monitoring of Journalistic Malpractices in Gaza Coverage

On this page, the editorial team of the Al Jazeera Journalism Review will collect news published by media institutions about the current war on Gaza that involves disinformation, bias, or professional journalistic standards and its code of ethics.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 5 Sep, 2024
India’s Social Media Crackdown; Broader Implications for Journalism

India’s crackdown on X-Twitter accounts documenting hate crimes highlights the increased risks faced by journalists who report on these issues. The suppression of such accounts significantly hampers the ability of journalists to access and report critical information on hate crimes.

Rushda Fathima Khan
Rushda Fathima Khan Published on: 3 Sep, 2024
Bangladesh: Why Were Foreign Correspondents Absent?

In the recent political upheaval in Bangladesh, many foreign journalists were reporting from nearby regions like New Delhi. In this absence, local journalists played an important role in conveying firsthand accounts of the events that unfolded to the world.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 26 Aug, 2024
India and Pakistan; Journalists building Bridges for Understanding

Amid decades of tension, journalists from India and Pakistan are uniting to combat hostile narratives and highlight shared challenges. Through collaboration, they’re fostering understanding on pressing issues like climate change and healthcare, proving that empathy can transcend borders. Discover how initiatives like the Journalists' Exchange Programme are paving the way for peace journalism and a more nuanced narrative.

Safina
Safina Nabi Published on: 12 Aug, 2024
Analysis: Media Disinformation and UK Far-Right Riots

Analysis on the impact of media disinformation on public opinion, particularly during UK riots incited by far-right groups. A look at how sensationalist media can directly influence audience behavior, as per the Hypodermic Needle Theory, leading to normalized discrimination and violence. The need for responsible journalism is emphasized to prevent such harmful effects.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 8 Aug, 2024
Challenges of Investigating Subculture Stories in Japan as a Foreign Correspondent

Japan's vibrant subcultures and feminist activists challenge the reductive narratives often portrayed in Western media. To understand this dynamic society authentically, journalists must approach their reporting with patience, commitment, and empathy, shedding preconceptions and engaging deeply with the nuances of Japanese culture.

Johann Fleuri
Johann Fleuri Published on: 24 Jun, 2024
How AI Synthesised Media Shapes Voter Perception: India's Case in Point

The recent Indian elections witnessed the unprecedented use of generative AI, leading to a surge in misinformation and deepfakes. Political parties leveraged AI to create digital avatars of deceased leaders, Bollywood actors

Suvrat Arora
Suvrat Arora Published on: 12 Jun, 2024