Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Ajmal Ahmadi stands beside a car which was damaged during a US drone strike which killed 10 civilians, including seven children, as he speaks with journalists at the house's courtyard in Khwaja Bughra in Kabul, Afghanistan on November 7, 2021. While the US government claims these strikes are highly precise, United Nations Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard says this is a 'myth' and such strikes cause countless civilian casualties. [REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra]

Life as a journalist on a US ‘kill list’

The US continues to shroud policies for the  ‘War on Terror’ behind a veil of secrecy. This undermines democracy and a free press, and means no justice for one American journalist who claims he has been targeted for assassination on five separate occasions, nor for countless civilian casualties of US drone attacks.


The US Supreme Court has refused to hear American journalist Bilal Abdul Kareem’s case calling on his government to admit it has targeted him for assassination on five occasions.

Bilal Abdul Kareem is a truth seeker who swapped the comedy circuits of New York for the Syrian war zone. He risked his life to report from opposition-held territory, operating on the ground to tell the stories of those facing the daily terror of government air strikes around the besieged city of Aleppo. But nothing prepared him for a fight that would take him all the way to the US Supreme Court, in an effort to uncover a very different truth, with him at the centre of the story.

In a case brought by our justice campaign group - 3DC - and the law firm LBKM, Abdul Kareem sued the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to force it to admit a very basic truth: that he has been placed on a “kill list” as part of the government’s assassination programme. Abdul Kareem's modest claim was that his constitutional rights as a US citizen will be violated if he is subjected to the death penalty without charges or a trial, and without the chance to defend himself. 

In a piece he wrote for Al Jazeera in 2016, Abdul Kareem, who converted to Islam in 1997, described the dangers of reporting from a war zone, but said he perseveres because “getting the truth to the world is important”. His philosophy to try and understand “the opposing point of view” led him to give airtime to a number of different Syrian groups, with varied perspectives, through his “On the Ground News Network”. 

The only people he would not talk to were the Assad regime and ISIS. His unique position as a US citizen in Syria gave him the opportunity to contribute to a number of other media organisations including Al Jazeera, CNN and Middle East Eye, exposing the horrors inflicted by all sides in the conflict. For this approach to his reporting, he has been accused by many of being a "jihadist propagandist".

He has never been given a reason for the attempts on his life, including one in which his SUV suffered a direct hit by a hellfire missile, fired from a US drone.  

Abdul Kareem's search for truth took him first to the Washington, DC District Court where, in 2019, his case was dismissed on the grounds of national security – it would apparently threaten the US (rather than Abdul Kareem) to have to admit he was a target for assassination. His appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals failed again to lift the veil of secrecy early in 2021.  

Abdul Kareem went to the US Supreme Court in search of both truth and justice, but the justices refused even to hear his petition. 

Since the events of 9/11 and the creation of a permanent “state of exception”, the US government has consistently invoked “national security” as grounds to maintain secrecy about a number of its “Global War on Terror” policies. These include its so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” - widely condemned as torture - and indefinite detention without trial, which continues today with 39 detainees who remain in Guantanamo Bay.  

The drone assassination programme, or what we would call the death penalty without trial, became the “go-to” weapon of choice for President Obama’s administration, and he escalated the use of drones in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia in particular. What he considered to be a “clean” method of dealing with terrorists, using “surgical precision”, however, was anything but.  

Agnes Callamard, former UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions, described the notion of surgical strikes as a “myth”. There have been countless examples of innocent lives lost to the "precision" targeting of armed drones, whether through proximity to the strike or mistaken identity. Indeed, it was a combination of the two that led to the recent killing of 10 members of the Ahmadi family in Kabul, including seven children, as the US withdrew from Afghanistan.

“I’m not surprised,” Abdul Kareem said when 3DC called to tell him the Supreme Court had declined to intervene. “I expected this because if they deal with me with justice and with fairness they're going to have to deal with other people with justice and fairness.” 

The Supreme Court ruling sets a dangerous precedent, offering no accountability to those the US simply decides it has the right to kill without due process. It also gives the green light to the US covert assassination programme and remote controlled “man-hunting” now also advocated by President Biden.  

In a speech on August 31, 2021, Biden described what he called “over-the-horizon capabilities”, widely accepted to mean the use of drones and other military technologies such as autonomous weapons, and promised those who wished America harm: “We will hunt you down to the ends of the Earth, and … you will pay the ultimate price.”

The message is clear. The US government does not want its national security policies under the spotlight, particularly one where the victims are most often unseen and voiceless, living in remote areas in far off countries, out of the gaze of public scrutiny.  

The wider human rights implications of this latest ruling are stark. If Abdul Kareem, as a US citizen, can be subject to the death penalty without trial, what hope do the millions of those living under the constant threat of drones around the world have?  

Clive Stafford Smith also contributed to this article

Pauline Canham is a freelance writer focusing on colonialism and counter-terrorism. She volunteers for the justice campaign group, 3DC.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance


More Articles

How Latin American media echoes Israeli discourse in reporting Gaza news

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict: Biased reporting and controversial journalistic stances

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023
Victims of the Mediterranean: ‘Migrants’ or ‘Refugees’?

The term ‘migrant’ insufficient to describe victims of the horror unfolding in the Mediterranean Sea; it dehumanises these people and is a failure of journalism

A picture of the author, Mohammad Ahdad.
Mohammad Ahdad Published on: 2 Oct, 2023
Why is a Western news organisation funding propaganda in India?

ANI, the world’s largest source of Indian news, receives funding from Thomson-Reuters, despite widespread condemnation for its misinformation about Muslims

Morley Musick Published on: 18 Sep, 2023
How do we determine 'newsworthiness' in the digital age?

The relentless flow of news in the digital age has re-shaped the parameters by which we decide what is 'news' and what is not

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 11 Sep, 2023
‘Focus on the story, not the storyteller’ - the dilemma of a diaspora journalist

When reporting on their homelands, diaspora journalists walk a fine line between emotional connection and objective storytelling

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 4 Sep, 2023
Why does Arab media fail so badly at covering refugee issues?

Arabic media discourse on refugees and migrants frequently aligns too closely with the Western narrative, often spreading fear of migrants while emphasising the burdens of asylum

A picture of the author, Ahmad Abu Hamad
Ahmad Abu Hamad Published on: 28 Aug, 2023
What does Zimbabwe’s new ‘Patriot Bill’ mean for journalists?  

As Zimbabwe heads into elections this week, a new law dubbed the ‘Patriot Bill’ will further criminalise journalism

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 21 Aug, 2023
Verify everything: What I learned from covering the Qatar World Cup 

Last year’s FIFA World Cup in Qatar was not the flop so many in the Western media predicted it would be. It taught me one thing - verify everything!

Noe Zavaleta Published on: 8 Aug, 2023
How do we determine ‘newsworthiness’?

Digital media and the algorithms used by platforms to determine the news they send out to their audiences have fundamentally changed the face of news planning

Mohammed Shazly Published on: 24 Jul, 2023
What Zimbabwe’s news rooms must learn from global media closures

A flourishing media needs more than just capital and a few good ideas - it needs innovation  

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Jul, 2023
Journalists beware! The silly season is upon us

With parliaments on recess and all the movers and shakers off on their holidays, journalists can find themselves scrabbling about for any old news to report. But be careful what you resort to

Ilya U Topper Published on: 3 Jul, 2023
Guatemalan media needs to talk about the consequences of corruption

The media in Guatemala has a responsibility to demonstrate how corruption affects people’s human rights

Jorge Sagastume Published on: 26 Jun, 2023
Donald Lu is dangerously wrong - India does not have a ‘free press’

The US must stop whitewashing Prime Minister Modi’s crackdown on Indian journalists

Safa Ahmed Published on: 20 Jun, 2023
Sudan shows us why Africans must tell their own conflict stories

Africa lacks freedom of expression because its stories are told by others

Philip Obaji Jr
Philip Obaji Jr Published on: 1 Jun, 2023
What happened when I asked ChatGPT to write my article

It got quite a lot right, and quite a lot very, very wrong

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 22 May, 2023
Shireen Abu Akleh’s forgotten murder

Over the past year, many in the media profession in the US have deliberately chosen to forget the assassination of their colleague

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 11 May, 2023