Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Ajmal Ahmadi stands beside a car which was damaged during a US drone strike which killed 10 civilians, including seven children, as he speaks with journalists at the house's courtyard in Khwaja Bughra in Kabul, Afghanistan on November 7, 2021. While the US government claims these strikes are highly precise, United Nations Special Rapporteur Agnes Callamard says this is a 'myth' and such strikes cause countless civilian casualties. [REUTERS/Zohra Bensemra]

Life as a journalist on a US ‘kill list’

The US continues to shroud policies for the  ‘War on Terror’ behind a veil of secrecy. This undermines democracy and a free press, and means no justice for one American journalist who claims he has been targeted for assassination on five separate occasions, nor for countless civilian casualties of US drone attacks.


The US Supreme Court has refused to hear American journalist Bilal Abdul Kareem’s case calling on his government to admit it has targeted him for assassination on five occasions.

Bilal Abdul Kareem is a truth seeker who swapped the comedy circuits of New York for the Syrian war zone. He risked his life to report from opposition-held territory, operating on the ground to tell the stories of those facing the daily terror of government air strikes around the besieged city of Aleppo. But nothing prepared him for a fight that would take him all the way to the US Supreme Court, in an effort to uncover a very different truth, with him at the centre of the story.

In a case brought by our justice campaign group - 3DC - and the law firm LBKM, Abdul Kareem sued the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), to force it to admit a very basic truth: that he has been placed on a “kill list” as part of the government’s assassination programme. Abdul Kareem's modest claim was that his constitutional rights as a US citizen will be violated if he is subjected to the death penalty without charges or a trial, and without the chance to defend himself. 

In a piece he wrote for Al Jazeera in 2016, Abdul Kareem, who converted to Islam in 1997, described the dangers of reporting from a war zone, but said he perseveres because “getting the truth to the world is important”. His philosophy to try and understand “the opposing point of view” led him to give airtime to a number of different Syrian groups, with varied perspectives, through his “On the Ground News Network”. 

The only people he would not talk to were the Assad regime and ISIS. His unique position as a US citizen in Syria gave him the opportunity to contribute to a number of other media organisations including Al Jazeera, CNN and Middle East Eye, exposing the horrors inflicted by all sides in the conflict. For this approach to his reporting, he has been accused by many of being a "jihadist propagandist".

He has never been given a reason for the attempts on his life, including one in which his SUV suffered a direct hit by a hellfire missile, fired from a US drone.  

Abdul Kareem's search for truth took him first to the Washington, DC District Court where, in 2019, his case was dismissed on the grounds of national security – it would apparently threaten the US (rather than Abdul Kareem) to have to admit he was a target for assassination. His appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals failed again to lift the veil of secrecy early in 2021.  

Abdul Kareem went to the US Supreme Court in search of both truth and justice, but the justices refused even to hear his petition. 

Since the events of 9/11 and the creation of a permanent “state of exception”, the US government has consistently invoked “national security” as grounds to maintain secrecy about a number of its “Global War on Terror” policies. These include its so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques” - widely condemned as torture - and indefinite detention without trial, which continues today with 39 detainees who remain in Guantanamo Bay.  

The drone assassination programme, or what we would call the death penalty without trial, became the “go-to” weapon of choice for President Obama’s administration, and he escalated the use of drones in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia in particular. What he considered to be a “clean” method of dealing with terrorists, using “surgical precision”, however, was anything but.  

Agnes Callamard, former UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary and arbitrary executions, described the notion of surgical strikes as a “myth”. There have been countless examples of innocent lives lost to the "precision" targeting of armed drones, whether through proximity to the strike or mistaken identity. Indeed, it was a combination of the two that led to the recent killing of 10 members of the Ahmadi family in Kabul, including seven children, as the US withdrew from Afghanistan.

“I’m not surprised,” Abdul Kareem said when 3DC called to tell him the Supreme Court had declined to intervene. “I expected this because if they deal with me with justice and with fairness they're going to have to deal with other people with justice and fairness.” 

The Supreme Court ruling sets a dangerous precedent, offering no accountability to those the US simply decides it has the right to kill without due process. It also gives the green light to the US covert assassination programme and remote controlled “man-hunting” now also advocated by President Biden.  

In a speech on August 31, 2021, Biden described what he called “over-the-horizon capabilities”, widely accepted to mean the use of drones and other military technologies such as autonomous weapons, and promised those who wished America harm: “We will hunt you down to the ends of the Earth, and … you will pay the ultimate price.”

The message is clear. The US government does not want its national security policies under the spotlight, particularly one where the victims are most often unseen and voiceless, living in remote areas in far off countries, out of the gaze of public scrutiny.  

The wider human rights implications of this latest ruling are stark. If Abdul Kareem, as a US citizen, can be subject to the death penalty without trial, what hope do the millions of those living under the constant threat of drones around the world have?  

Clive Stafford Smith also contributed to this article

Pauline Canham is a freelance writer focusing on colonialism and counter-terrorism. She volunteers for the justice campaign group, 3DC.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance


More Articles

International media has abandoned Afghanistan

The international community will be vital in helping Afghanistan to survive Taliban rule - but it has to start with a change of approach by Western media

Sayed Jalal
Sayed Jalal Shajjan Published on: 22 May, 2022
Let’s help refugees escape from the media’s ‘Ghetto of Compassion’

We must not lump all migrants and asylum seekers together when we report about refugees - ignoring nuance doesn’t solve problems

Alejandro Luque Published on: 15 May, 2022
The occupation of Palestine is not a conflict of equal sides - media needs to start telling the truth

Western media's response to the killing of veteran journalist Shireen Abu Akleh by Israeli forces in Palestine is shameful. Until the media starts reporting the truth about Israeli brutality in Palestine, the killing of journalists doing their jobs will continue

Nina Montagu-Smith
Nina Montagu-Smith Published on: 11 May, 2022
The US is on its way to criminalising journalism

Billed as a ‘super fact checker’, Joe Biden’s new ‘Disinformation Governance Board’ is the first step on this path

Martin Jay
Martin Jay Published on: 9 May, 2022
Beware of activist journalists - they won’t always tell the ugly truth

It is the job of journalists to report the full truth - even when that might cast the ‘good’ guys in a ‘bad’ light

Ilya U Topper Published on: 25 Apr, 2022
Bangladesh’s Digital Security Act is criminalising journalism

Bangladesh has been quietly strengthening its laws curtailing freedom of expression - with dangerous results

Rokeya Lita Published on: 18 Apr, 2022
Moscow’s journalistic lights are dimmed, but their story needs to be told

Russia is waging a war on independent journalists who dare to question or contradict the official government line - we must do more to support them

Aidan White Published on: 7 Apr, 2022
Why healthy democracies need news junkies

Studies show that news junkies are more likely to register to vote and be politically engaged, but they are not better at predicting future events

Justin D Martin, Krishna Sharma Published on: 3 Apr, 2022
We need more raw coverage of conflict zones to make people care about all refugees

Coverage of Ukrainian refugees has been more sympathetic because it is usually accompanied by images of the crisis they are fleeing

Tomasz Lesniara Published on: 27 Mar, 2022
Facebook is showing its double standards over freedom of speech

Hate speech is a bad idea. A good idea would be for platforms to show consistency in their content moderation, particularly when it comes to Palestine

A picture of the author, Abeer alNajjar
Abeer Al-Najjar Published on: 17 Mar, 2022
When women are being smeared - listen to what they are saying

Cassandra was cursed to always see the future, but to never be believed. For female journalists like Carole Cadwalladr, long dismissed as a 'mad cat lady', it’s a familiar tale

Nina Montagu-Smith
Nina Montagu-Smith Published on: 16 Mar, 2022
Zimbabwe’s Fourth Estate is under siege

With few job opportunities, harassment by the authorities and a global pandemic, the picture for balanced and truthful journalism is not a pretty one

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Mar, 2022
The irony of fake news - sometimes it serves to highlight injustice

Last week, the image of a blonde-haired Palestinian girl standing up to an Israeli soldier was wrongly credited as an image of a Ukrainian girl confronting a Russian soldier. The intention was to garner sympathy for Ukraine - instead, it had a rather different outcome

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 6 Mar, 2022
‘You must know how to haggle!’ - racism in journalism starts in the classroom 

Even though I didn’t choose to, I quickly became that one ‘annoying’ journalist of colour who had to keep mentioning racism in my journalism school. It was humiliating and exhausting, to the point of nearly quitting

Azraa Muthy Published on: 24 Feb, 2022
Human rights lessons from a ‘terrorist’ journalist

It has ever been the case that when a journalist reports crimes by a despot, militant group or even, these days, a so-called democratic state, he is liable to be labelled a criminal.

Clive Stafford Smith
Clive Stafford Smith Published on: 30 Jan, 2022
How should we talk about Pakistan?

How do journalists report accurately about a country which suffers sectarian violence without reinforcing Islamophobic tropes?

Haroon Khalid
Haroon Khalid Published on: 24 Jan, 2022
'Both sides’ journalism does not always show us the truth

Journalists are bound to tell the truth, not give platforms to positions which are demonstrably wrong in a misguided attempt to be ‘impartial’.

Sakhr Al-Makhadhi Published on: 17 Jan, 2022
Forget superheroes - science journalists will save the world

Science journalism is not just about test tubes, it's about everything. And the past few years have shown that the world needs science journalists more than ever before.

Osama Abu El Rub Published on: 16 Jan, 2022
The media must stop obsessing about ‘economic migrants’

The use of the term ‘economic migrants’ to describe desperate people trying to find a better life for themselves and their families conceals the reality of the brutality they face at Europe’s borders.

Lucy Papachristou Published on: 13 Dec, 2021
No, you are NOT the story

A writer reflects on the absurdity - and naivety - of journalists who place themselves at the centre of the stories they cover.

Noe Zavaleta Published on: 21 Nov, 2021
It’s time to put an end to ‘parachute’ journalism

While global media organisations continue to fly in their own correspondents, relying on local journalists only for translation and ‘fixing’, the world will never get to know the real stories happening in the Global South.

Dina Aboughazala
Dina Aboughazala Published on: 7 Nov, 2021
Julian Assange and Wikileaks are no model for responsible journalism

Punishing journalists who publish leaked information is an assault on democracy, but journalists still need to handle such information with care and integrity.

Julie Bindel Published on: 31 Oct, 2021
When journalists are blind to their privilege, the ‘true’ story may not be told

It took me years to see how my privilege would influence the outcome of interviews with minority Hindus in Pakistan. This ‘positionality’ is something journalists should pay closer heed to.

Haroon Khalid
Haroon Khalid Published on: 24 Oct, 2021
Why I’ve had to launch my own magazine about Pakistan

Western media is full of negative stereotypes about my birth country. My job as a diaspora journalist is to challenge those tired old tropes.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 12 Oct, 2021