Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Facebook outside
GAZA CITY, GAZA: Palestinian journalists hold placards during a protest against social media platform Facebook after nearly 300 Palestinian accounts had been blocked, in front of the United Nations building in Gaza City, Gaza on March 5, 2018. [Mustafa Hassona/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images]

Facebook is showing its double standards over freedom of speech

Hate speech is a bad idea. A good idea would be for platforms to show consistency in their content moderation, particularly when it comes to Palestine


This week, Meta, the mother company of Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp, announced that it had “temporarily made allowances for the forms of political expressions that would normally violate our rules like violent speech as ‘death to Russian invaders’. We still won’t allow credible calls for violence against Russian civilians.”

According to this new policy, then, calling for the death of Russians is considered a “form of political speech” but its platform, Instagram, reportedly erases posts, images and links that document Israel’s human rights abuses against Palestinians even when these posts are not opinions, but rather news items from credible news sources, as Human Rights Watch reported in October 2021.

According to that report, hundreds of accounts were also suspended based on peaceful solidarity, not calls for violence, incitement or hate towards Israelis. Much of the Palestinian content was censored or - in the company’s terminology - “moderated”, despite the fact that the majority included no direct calls for violence or hate speech. 

The mainstream global English-speaking media have consistently stifled debate about the Palestinians’ cause, their human rights or actions. Longstanding strategies of focusing on reporting violence, prioritising Israeli sources over Palestinian ones, maintaining affinity with Israel official narratives when it comes to describing the events and framing Palestinian resistance as “terrorism”, has led to mainstreaming bias against them. 

Ironically, even the Israeli liberal press occasionally shows more fairness towards the Palestinians than the American press does. 

The Palestinian Uprising of May 2021 was a case in point. Palestinians in the occupied territories took to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and TikTok to tell their stories which are normally suppressed by the mainstream media. They used these social media platforms to share and document Israeli police brutality, violations of Palestinians’ rights, forced evictions and denials of access to the Al-Aqsa Mosque during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, and to call for solidarity with their non-violent resistance. 

The response of the social networks was to apply strict censorship to Palestinian and pro-Palestinian content. 

Facebook, Instagram and Twitter either deleted or demoted pro-Palestinian posts and suspended activists, journalists and news media accounts, largely affecting the already stifled global narrative, effectively aiding Israeli suppression of the Palestinian story and silencing any criticism of Israel’s brutal occupation and its colonial policies. 

In relaxing its rules to allow Ukrainians to protest against Russian oppression, Facebook shows it knows exactly how wrong this treatment of the Palestinians is


For the first few days of the uprising in May 2021, Tik Tok was the only platform that granted the Palestinians the freedom of speech and publishing. Palestinian and pro-Palestinian speech was labelled as “hate speech”, denying Palestinians under Israeli occupation and around the world their freedom of expression, where it should be granted as their right under international law and treaties. 

Many international organisations documented and reported these human rights abuses of the Palestinians by these networks including PAX, Article 19, AccessNow, the Palestinian Digital Rights Organization and 7amleh. 

META claims it is completely transparent in its guidelines but little explanation is provided as to how a post or an account might have violated its community guidelines or what its guidelines are for moderating Palestinian content. 

So how does META develop content moderation policy and who has the freedom to speak on its platforms? These are important questions that Facebook and its Oversight Board, which claims to work towards “ensuring respect for free expression through independent judgement” must answer now. 

How are appointments to the Facebook Oversight Board scrutinised? Emi Palmor, previously the General Director of the Israeli Ministry of Justice (2014-2019), is a member of this Oversight Board. Her appointment came despite calls from international rights groups and organisations to block it. The Association for Progressive Communications said: “Under Palmor’s direction, the Israeli Ministry of Justice petitioned Facebook to censor legitimate speech of human rights defenders and journalists because it was deemed politically undesirable.” 

Similarly, Jordana Cutler, Facebook’s director of policy for Israel is a former advisor to former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Both of these appointments indicate a tendency for Facebook to consult with right-wing proponents of Israel, with internationally acclaimed rights groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace are seemingly ignored.

Israel has historically over-securitised freedom of expression and arrested Palestinian activists for Facebook and Twitter posts, marking them as “terrorists” for their political views. In relaxing their rules to allow Ukrainians to do exactly the same when it comes to Russian oppression, Facebook et al show they know exactly how wrong this treatment is.

Abeer Al-Najjar is Associate Professor in the Department of Mass Communications of the American University of Sharjah


The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance





More Articles

How Latin American media echoes Israeli discourse in reporting Gaza news

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict: Biased reporting and controversial journalistic stances

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023
Victims of the Mediterranean: ‘Migrants’ or ‘Refugees’?

The term ‘migrant’ insufficient to describe victims of the horror unfolding in the Mediterranean Sea; it dehumanises these people and is a failure of journalism

A picture of the author, Mohammad Ahdad.
Mohammad Ahdad Published on: 2 Oct, 2023
Why is a Western news organisation funding propaganda in India?

ANI, the world’s largest source of Indian news, receives funding from Thomson-Reuters, despite widespread condemnation for its misinformation about Muslims

Morley Musick Published on: 18 Sep, 2023
How do we determine 'newsworthiness' in the digital age?

The relentless flow of news in the digital age has re-shaped the parameters by which we decide what is 'news' and what is not

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 11 Sep, 2023
‘Focus on the story, not the storyteller’ - the dilemma of a diaspora journalist

When reporting on their homelands, diaspora journalists walk a fine line between emotional connection and objective storytelling

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 4 Sep, 2023
Why does Arab media fail so badly at covering refugee issues?

Arabic media discourse on refugees and migrants frequently aligns too closely with the Western narrative, often spreading fear of migrants while emphasising the burdens of asylum

A picture of the author, Ahmad Abu Hamad
Ahmad Abu Hamad Published on: 28 Aug, 2023
What does Zimbabwe’s new ‘Patriot Bill’ mean for journalists?  

As Zimbabwe heads into elections this week, a new law dubbed the ‘Patriot Bill’ will further criminalise journalism

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 21 Aug, 2023
Verify everything: What I learned from covering the Qatar World Cup 

Last year’s FIFA World Cup in Qatar was not the flop so many in the Western media predicted it would be. It taught me one thing - verify everything!

Noe Zavaleta Published on: 8 Aug, 2023
How do we determine ‘newsworthiness’?

Digital media and the algorithms used by platforms to determine the news they send out to their audiences have fundamentally changed the face of news planning

Mohammed Shazly Published on: 24 Jul, 2023
What Zimbabwe’s news rooms must learn from global media closures

A flourishing media needs more than just capital and a few good ideas - it needs innovation  

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Jul, 2023
Journalists beware! The silly season is upon us

With parliaments on recess and all the movers and shakers off on their holidays, journalists can find themselves scrabbling about for any old news to report. But be careful what you resort to

Ilya U Topper Published on: 3 Jul, 2023
Guatemalan media needs to talk about the consequences of corruption

The media in Guatemala has a responsibility to demonstrate how corruption affects people’s human rights

Jorge Sagastume Published on: 26 Jun, 2023
Donald Lu is dangerously wrong - India does not have a ‘free press’

The US must stop whitewashing Prime Minister Modi’s crackdown on Indian journalists

Safa Ahmed Published on: 20 Jun, 2023
Sudan shows us why Africans must tell their own conflict stories

Africa lacks freedom of expression because its stories are told by others

Philip Obaji Jr
Philip Obaji Jr Published on: 1 Jun, 2023
What happened when I asked ChatGPT to write my article

It got quite a lot right, and quite a lot very, very wrong

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 22 May, 2023
Shireen Abu Akleh’s forgotten murder

Over the past year, many in the media profession in the US have deliberately chosen to forget the assassination of their colleague

Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 11 May, 2023