Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Climate journalism is growing up

 Environmental coverage is moving on from panic-inducing warnings about global warming to the more constructive, solutions-based approach of climate journalism

 

Anyone who was around in the early 2000s will remember the caricature of planet Earth, looking distressed with a thermometer in its mouth. The imagery was often (and almost over-) used to depict global warming as one of the most urgent issues of the hour for humans around the world. 

Global warming as a cause, when visually depicted, was also routinely accompanied by discussions about Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), the growing hole in the Ozone layer, the effects of greenhouse gases, melting glaciers, imbalanced water cycles and a fast approaching shortage of potable water. 

Over time, “global warming” graduated to “climate change”, and there was an increased sense of urgency to it. Clearly, the world had failed to cure the planet’s fever. Many argued that too little was being done to combat global warming in the first place. The world still felt far too invincible on its post-industrialisation high, and altogether refused to curtail manufacturing, channel resources towards studies on global warming and the environment or take a step back from capitalist materialism leading to exploitation of natural resources. 

The question is - what’s in a name? Sometimes everything. 

The difference between “global warming” and “climate change” was that before the latter came along, there still seemed to be some hope. Hope that would soon evaporate into a toxic mist of inevitable doom. Whether that sense of impending doom is justified or not, is not a question that dared be answered at this stage. Perhaps, it is entirely the wrong question to ask at this point of time. 

For a generation that grew up seeing the Ozone layer as one of the biggest signals for “global warming,” the recent news about how the Ozone layer is healing means a great deal. It also shows there are myriad meanings about how a generation views climate change and media coverage of it. While the effects of climate change are often presented as impending doom - causing anxieties and pushing for policy changes - climate journalism is taking shape as the next big thing. This paradox, while concerning, also makes complete sense. 

 

It is up to climate journalists to bring together the polarised extremes in the middle and discuss viable solutions

 

And it is in this rising popularity for climate journalism that perhaps lies the trick to make nuances of climate change accessible to the public. But it is also important to question exactly what the future of climate journalism can look like in the long-run for a planet seemingly on the brink. 

Media and journalism - like in arguably all other matters concerning human life - this time too took the central role of the ringmaster in that it shaped the polarised narratives from all sides. While individuals around the world still argue over the shape of the planet, understandably, it can become difficult to get them to agree on its fate. 

Where there is polarisation, there is interest - and vice versa. And so, climate journalism was born. For now, it seems that climate as a beat will be a part of the future of profitable journalism. However, the relationship between a rising beat and a dying planet continues to remain vastly complicated for reasons that may be difficult to spot but are often quite easy to comprehend. 

There is a clear correlation that can explain why climate journalism has picked up like never before as the planet has continued on what seems like its sharpest free-fall descent yet. Of the pillars that make up the criteria for a newsworthy story, currency is an important one. While climate stories might have wrongly seemed to lack that currency for the past decade or so, the urgency regarding climate stories is now alarmingly obvious - making it hard to ignore as a beat. 

The polarisation surrounding climate change, and climate journalism in particular, has taken a prominent shape - the debate between scientific reality and alarmism. Former US President Donald Trump called climate activists “perennial prophets of doom”. Greta Thunberg was in his audience during that particular speech, and that speaks well to the larger differences in ways that different generations view the seriousness of climate change. However, it is important to note that there is a whole spectrum of opinions between Trump and Thunberg. 

While some agree with the scientific numbers and statistics that admittedly have the potential to often act like harbingers of doom, others believe that the growing immediacy concerning discussions of climate change are mere forms of baseless alarmism. 

When looking through media coverage of climate change, it is not difficult to see that there is an array of reasons why different stakeholders have their own incentives to take climate change as seriously - or not - as they wish. Capitalist corporates have their interests at stake, political parties have their agendas to project, and individuals possess their own values which sometimes clash with taking decisions for or against the environment - the debate is clearly not black or white. 

Someone who has never seen snow can feel disconnected to a story on the specifics of melting glaciers

 

It is in the greys of compromise and cooperation that solutions towards a better future for our planet may be found. And no one, in the current scenario, is a bigger stakeholder in the climate change debate than the media. 

It is up to climate journalists to bring together the polarised extremes in the middle and discuss viable solutions. While media outlets may find that they have been benefiting from the polarisation, they also have to accept that if climate journalism cannot place the planet at the forefront, then surely no reader can be expected to either. 

Proximity is another important pillar of newsworthiness, which plays a defining role in how stories about climate change are received by the masses. When talking about the planet, it should make sense that geography will play a pivotal role. 

Someone who has never seen snow can feel disconnected to a story on the specifics of melting glaciers. Similarly, for a reader living in a very cold climate, it may be difficult to feel as strongly about a climate story set in a tropical rainforest. We may all live on the same planet, but we perceive tiny pockets of it as our own, and for many, relating to geographies that we do not consider our own can be difficult. 

Here's when climate journalists have a chance to step in and make the beat their own. Climate stories need to be made local. People need to know how ocean pollution affects the food on their plates. The unfortunate truth is that the majority will not care about the climate for the planet’s sake alone. 

People may not be stunned by the number of cigarette butts on a beach hundreds of miles away from them, but they will be all ears once they hear of how a national climate crisis trickles down to their local source of drinking water. Human beings are inherently selfish, and climate journalism is missing out on a golden opportunity if it does not make the most of that selfishness. 

Ultimately, journalists will have to recognize that climate journalism should not remain a standalone beat. In what seems like an inevitable step, discussions on climate change will become a part of several other beats such as politics, public health and policy, economics, infrastructure, and gender. 

With how unrelenting the impact of climate change is expected to be on countries and communities across the world, climate stories will be ubiquitous across different beats of journalism. And that is what makes it easy and challenging at the same time. 

Abeer Khan is an Indian journalist and academic

 

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance

 

More Articles

Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
The Perils of Unverified News: A Case of Nonexistent Flotillas

Can you hide one thousand ships in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea? I would say not. But some of my fellow journalists seem to believe in magic.  

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 16 Jan, 2024
In the Courtroom and Beyond: Covering South Africa's Historic Legal Case Against Israel at The Hague

As South Africa takes on Israel at the International Court of Justice, the role of journalists in covering this landmark case becomes more crucial than ever. Their insights and reporting bring the complexities of international law to a global audience.

Hala Ahed
Hala Ahed Published on: 12 Jan, 2024
Did the NYTimes Manipulate the Sexual Violence Allegations of October 7?

An in-depth examination of the New York Times's investigation of alleged sexual assaults by Hamas during the Israeli war on Gaza, highlighting ethical concerns, and the impact of its reporting on the victims' families. It questions the journalistic integrity of the Times, especially in the context of Western media's portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 7 Jan, 2024
Is The New York Times Reproducing Allegations of 'Sexual Violence' to Downplay Israeli Crimes?

The New York Times' report on alleged sexual violence by Palestinian militants raises profound concerns about discrepancies in key testimonies and a biased reporting that aligns with Israeli narratives and downplays Israeli crimes in Gaza.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 31 Dec, 2023
Embedded journalism: Striking a balance between access and impartiality in war zones

The ethical implications of embedded journalism, particularly in the Israeli invasion of Gaza, raise concerns about the compromise of balance and independence in war coverage.

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 19 Dec, 2023
Through a Mexican lens: Navigating the intricacies of reporting in Palestine

A Mexican journalist's journey through the complexities of reporting on Palestine and gives tips on how to manage this kind of coverage.

Témoris Grecko
Témoris Grecko Published on: 10 Dec, 2023
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan
Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno
Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha
Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Mitrovica
Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023
Victims of the Mediterranean: ‘Migrants’ or ‘Refugees’?

The term ‘migrant’ insufficient to describe victims of the horror unfolding in the Mediterranean Sea; it dehumanises these people and is a failure of journalism

A picture of the author, Mohammad Ahdad.
Mohammad Ahdad Published on: 2 Oct, 2023
Why is a Western news organisation funding propaganda in India?

ANI, the world’s largest source of Indian news, receives funding from Thomson-Reuters, despite widespread condemnation for its misinformation about Muslims

MM
Morley Musick Published on: 18 Sep, 2023
How do we determine 'newsworthiness' in the digital age?

The relentless flow of news in the digital age has re-shaped the parameters by which we decide what is 'news' and what is not

Muhammad Khamaiseh Published on: 11 Sep, 2023
‘Focus on the story, not the storyteller’ - the dilemma of a diaspora journalist

When reporting on their homelands, diaspora journalists walk a fine line between emotional connection and objective storytelling

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 4 Sep, 2023
Why does Arab media fail so badly at covering refugee issues?

Arabic media discourse on refugees and migrants frequently aligns too closely with the Western narrative, often spreading fear of migrants while emphasising the burdens of asylum

A picture of the author, Ahmad Abu Hamad
Ahmad Abu Hamad Published on: 28 Aug, 2023