Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Outside image
Billboards display Turkish President and People's Alliance's presidential candidate Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, in Istanbul, Türkiye, on Wednesday, April 19, 2023 [Francisco Seco/AP]

The correspondent's job: Ask people, don't tell them

Should foreign correspondents and their media organisations ever take a stand on another country’s political divisions?

 

This week, the prestigious British weekly, The Economist, devoted its front page to the upcoming elections in Türkiye, describing them as the most important of 2023. With this I might agree. But The Economist also included a call to vote and the words: "Erdoğan must go". This strikes me as running counter to journalistic ethics. 

"Light and stenographers" are the basic tenets of democracy, as Spanish Prime Minister Antonio Maura famously said in the early decades of the 20th century. By "stenographers", he meant the employees of Parliament charged with transcribing all speeches delivered by politicians during the sessions, so people would be able to check proposals and promises made by their elected representatives and hold them accountable. The concept is nowadays considered shorthand for a free press, able to transmit accurately what is happening in the political sphere. 

With many countries in the world ruled by not-so-democratic regimes, foreign correspondents often see themselves in the role of the stenographer, with the duty of shining a light on the realm of politics and telling their audience what exactly takes place there. This is true even in a democratic country like Türkiye, where there are many good local journalists who do this job. Despite a low ranking in the world press freedom index published annually by Reporters Without Borders, where Türkiye ranks 165 out of 180 countries, there is still a free press in the country, with outspoken oppositional newspapers not only mushrooming online but also sold at the average newspaper stand in the street. However, their readership is small - 90 percent of the media is in the hands of businesspeople close to the president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who is seeking re-election next Sunday, May 14. And it goes without saying that these media outlets repeat everything the president says, without ever doing much fact-checking of the details. 

I am routinely asked for my own opinion when asking citizens for theirs. And I never give a straight answer

 

Unfortunately, the opposition press does not do much fact-checking either and its attempts to counter the Government's discourse are often more emotionally driven than analytical. This is the result of a society so deeply divided today between Erdoğan's supporters and opposition voters that there is barely any space left for rational discussion. Followers of the president will refuse to doubt his words and adversaries will not bother to separate grains of truth and falsehood in a narrative they consider anyhow an all-round imposture. This, of course, makes opposition media a no-more-trustworthy source of news for those who feel caught in the middle or are doubtful. 

In this situation, foreign correspondents are often considered an impartial or at least level-headed arbiter, even by many locals who are no longer sure who to trust. When covering the election campaign - but even long before, because in Türkiye, the last few years have felt like a prolonged election campaign - I am routinely asked for my own opinion when asking citizens for theirs. And I never give a straight answer. Not just because I don't want people to give me the answers they assume I want to hear, but because it goes against our work ethics. As a journalist, and specifically as a foreign one, you are not supposed to influence the situation you are observing and describing.

This is not always easy, because being a long-term correspondent is somewhat different from covering an election as a reporter sent on a one-off mission. Of course, when going to a foreign country to report about elections, everybody will already have chosen his or her side, even if unconsciously, so being impartial or at least keeping the appearance of being it, will always require effort. But on the one hand, journalists on a short mission must be always open to changing their mind as information unfolds, and then, they have not really a stake in what is happening - after the votes are counted and the result announced, there is a flight ticket back home. 

For a long-term correspondent, the situation is different. Perhaps there is no "home" to go to, or at least not without the great effort of a job change. I have lived in Türkiye for more than a decade, as have many other foreign journalists in Istanbul. Theoretically, we are entitled to apply for citizenship, but all the journalists I know have avoided doing it - one of the assets of being a foreign correspondent is precisely being foreign. Of course we have a stake in what is happening in this country, which we love and where we have chosen to live. This is not only emotional, because the victory of one side or the other can make the life of all journalists, both local and foreign, easier or more difficult. But it is emotional, too. Being a journalist does not mean being insensitive and not caring about what is happening around you. It just means you don’t show it while you are working. But you will soon understand that the term "work" covers everything you write or do in public. 

Being a journalist does not mean being insensitive and not caring about what is happening around you. It just means you don’t show it while you are working

 

Back in Spain - my country - I used to go to protest marches as a citizen fulfilling my duty of political participation in a democracy. I have never gone to any in Türkiye. That is, as a protester. I have of course gone to hundreds with the camera in one hand and a notepad in the other. Asking questions, taking pictures and writing news. But never shouting a slogan. This sometimes needs some self-control. I remember the Gezi protests in Istanbul in 2013, when tens of thousands of citizens, mostly young people, men and women, flocked to Taksim square, turning a small environmentalist sit-in in a huge rally that can probably only be compared to the 1968 student rebellion in Paris. Or so it felt for many of us who had not been born at that time but kept a cultural memory of "Paris 68" as a turning point in European politics and youth movements. In any case, it seemed to be a historical moment for Türkiye, too, and to witness it was a privilege. 

But witnessing is the word: we, as journalists, are not part of the protest. We choose not to be. We carry no flags or banners. We shut our mouths when others are speaking. It is a matter of principle: either you cover a protest for news or you take part, but you can’t do both things at the same time. And you soon discover that you cannot do it at other times either, because once you are a foreign correspondent, you cannot leave that aspect of your life to one side for an hour or a day.  

As journalists, we are often proud of being on call 24 hours a day - and not only literally, ready to pick up the phone at any time, but also metaphorically: every person we meet might be a future source for doing news, every conversation we have, be it during shopping or dancing in a bar, will add something to our knowledge of the country and shape the background of what we write. You never really disconnect because observing reality is your job. And we have to realise that reality does observe us, too. Whatever we do will be done in our quality as foreign journalists. And our job is to tell how the country is doing, not to tell the country what it should do.

That is the same attitude I try to keep up during this election campaign, probably the most polarised ever seen in a country which started being polarised 10 years ago, precisely after the Gezi protests had been quelled. Of course I know which party I would like to see win. But I will not tell you. I'll tell you what people think, on one side of the political spectrum and on the other, and I'll give you the facts of how the country is doing right now, but I'll stop there. Therefore, I think The Economist made a mistake on its frontpage. I know that UK and American newspapers have a tradition of officially endorsing one candidate in the elections, and that might be fair, because most papers have their specific ideological outlook and it is okay to express it openly. But when it comes to the democratic exercise of a foreign country, telling its citizens for whom they should vote is not okay. Not only because an impartial analysis in the foreign press is valued precisely for being impartial, but also because it shows a lack of respect for Turkish voters: do they really need a British news organisation to tell them what to do with their country?

Ilya U Topper is a Spanish journalist based in Istanbul

 

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera Journalism Review’s editorial stance

 

More Articles

The Media Landscape in Sudan During the War

The ongoing war in Sudan has dismantled many media institutions, creating a vacuum filled by a vast stream of rumors and false information that has fueled internal conflict. A large segment of the public has turned to social media platforms in search of the truth, while some traditional media outlets continue to operate despite the targeting of their offices and journalists.

Mohammed Babiker Al-Awad
Mohammed Babiker Al-Awad Published on: 30 Apr, 2025
Western Media’s Double Standards on Muslim Women’s Suffering

When an Iranian student publicly protested against security forces by undressing, the moment garnered widespread attention in Western media. Meanwhile, even as 70 percent of those killed in Palestine are women and children, this ongoing violence—including the systematic killing, torture, and detention of Palestinian women—receives minimal coverage. This disparity raises urgent questions: How do Western media represent women’s issues in the Islamic world, and to what extent are such portrayals shaped by double standards?

Shaimaa Al-Eisai
Shaimaa Al-Eisai Published on: 24 Apr, 2025
Western Media Has Failed Their Palestinian Colleagues

A 2024 CPJ report revealed that nearly 70% of journalists killed that year were targeted by Israel, yet major Western media outlets largely ignored or downplayed the findings. The muted response to these targeted attacks and escalating press restrictions highlights a troubling double standard in the West’s commitment to press freedom.

Assal Rad
Assal Rad Published on: 21 Apr, 2025
Weaponizing the Law: SLAPPs Against Journalists and Press Freedom

SLAPPs—abusive lawsuits designed to silence journalists and activists—are surging across Southeast Asia, exploiting vague laws and weak protections to punish those who speak truth to power. As legal harassment intensifies, journalists face not only imprisonment and censorship but also emotional trauma, exile, and long-term damage to their careers.

AJR Contributor Published on: 17 Apr, 2025
Predicting the Future of Media in 2025

The rise of citizen journalism, the rethinking of long-form content, the evolution of video, and the exploration of AI opportunities are key elements of the media landscape forecast for 2025, according to a report from Harvard University's Nieman Lab.

Othman Kabashi
Othman Kabashi Published on: 15 Apr, 2025
Revisioning Journalism During a Genocide

Western media’s coverage of the Gaza genocide has revealed fundamental cracks in the notion of journalistic objectivity. Mainstream outlets have frequently marginalized or discredited Palestinian perspectives, often echoing narratives that align with Israeli state interests. In stark contrast, Palestinian journalists—reporting from within a besieged landscape—have become frontline truth-tellers. Through raw, emotional storytelling, they are not only documenting atrocities but also redefining journalism as a form of resistance and a reclaiming of ethical purpose.

Ana Maria Monjardino
Ana Maria Monjardino Published on: 4 Apr, 2025
How Media Drives Collective Adaptation During Natural Disasters in Oman

This paper highlights how Omani media, during times of natural disasters, focused on praising government efforts to improve its image, while neglecting the voices of victims and those affected by the cyclones. It also examines the media’s role in warning against and preventing future disasters.

Shaimaa Al-Eisai
Shaimaa Al-Eisai Published on: 31 Mar, 2025
Systematic Bias: How Western Media Framed the March 18 Massacre of Palestinians

On March 18, Israel launched a large-scale assault on Gaza, killing over 412 Palestinians and injuring more than 500, while Western media uncritically echoed Israel’s claim of “targeting Hamas.” Rather than exposing the massacre, coverage downplayed the death toll, delayed key facts, and framed the attacks as justified pressure on Hamas—further highlighting the double standard in valuing Palestinian lives.

Mei Shigenobu مي شيغينوبو
Mei Shigenobu Published on: 18 Mar, 2025
Misinformation in Syria: Natural Chaos or Organised Campaign?

Old videos inciting “sectarian strife,” statements taken out of context attacking Christians, scenes of heavy weaponry clashes in other countries, fabricated stories of fictitious detainees, and a huge amount of fake news that accompanied the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime: Is it the natural chaos of transition or a systematic campaign?

Farhat Khedr
Farhat Khedr Published on: 11 Mar, 2025
Trump and the Closure of USAID: A Candid Conversation on "Independent Media"

The impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's decision to halt foreign funding through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) on Arab media platforms has largely gone undiscussed. Some of these platforms have consistently labelled themselves as "independent" despite being Western-funded. This article examines the reasons behind the failure of economic models for Western-funded institutions in the Arab world and explores the extent of their editorial independence.

Ahmad Abuhamad Published on: 9 Mar, 2025
The Sharp Contrast: How Israeli and Western Media Cover the War on Gaza

Despite being directly governed by Israeli policies, some Israeli media outlets critically report on their government’s actions and use accurate terminology, whereas Western media has shown complete bias, failing to be impartial in its coverage of Israel’s aggression in Gaza.

Faras Ghani Published on: 5 Mar, 2025
International Media Seek Gaza Access; What Do Palestinian Journalists Say?

As international media push for access to Gaza, Palestinian journalists—who have been the primary voices on the ground—criticize their Western counterparts for failing to acknowledge their contributions, amplify their reports, or support them as they risk their lives to document the war. They face systemic bias and exploitation, and continue to work under extreme conditions without proper recognition or support.

NILOFAR ABSAR
Nilofar Absar Published on: 26 Feb, 2025
Journalism and Artificial Intelligence: Who Controls the Narrative?

How did the conversation about using artificial intelligence in journalism become merely a "trend"? And can we say that much of the media discourse on AI’s potential remains broad and speculative rather than a tangible reality in newsrooms?

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 23 Feb, 2025
The Whispers of Resistance in Assad’s Reign

For more than a decade of the Syrian revolution, the former regime has employed various forms of intimidation against journalists—killing, interrogations, and forced displacement—all for a single purpose: silencing their voices. Mawadda Bahah hid behind pseudonyms and shifted her focus to environmental issues after a "brief session" at the Kafar Soussa branch of Syria’s intelligence agency.

Mawadah Bahah
Mawadah Bahah Published on: 18 Feb, 2025
Culture of silence: Journalism and mental health problems in Africa

The revealing yet underreported impact of mental health on African journalists is far-reaching. Many of them lack medical insurance, support, and counselling while covering sensitive topics or residing in conflicting, violent war zones, with some even considering suicide.

Derick Matsengarwodzi
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 13 Feb, 2025
Tweets Aren’t News: Why Journalism Still Matters

Twitter, once key for real-time news, has become a battleground of misinformation and outrage, drowning out factual journalism. With major newspapers leaving, the challenge is to remind audiences that true news comes from credible sources, not the chaos of social media.

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 10 Feb, 2025
Will Meta Become a Platform for Disinformation and Conspiracy Theories?

Meta’s decision to abandon third-party fact-checking in favor of Community Notes aligns with Donald Trump’s long-standing criticisms of media scrutiny, raising concerns that the platform will fuel disinformation, conspiracy theories, and political polarization. With support from Elon Musk’s X, major social media platforms now lean toward a "Trumpian" stance, potentially weakening global fact-checking efforts and reshaping the online information landscape.

Arwa Kooli
Arwa Kooli Published on: 5 Feb, 2025
October 7: The Battle for Narratives and the Forgotten Roots of Palestine

What is the difference between October 6th and October 7th? How did the media distort the historical context and mislead the public? Why did some Arab media strip the genocidal war from its roots? Is there an agenda behind highlighting the Israel-Hamas duality in news coverage?

Said El Hajji
Said El Hajji Published on: 21 Jan, 2025
Challenges of Unequal Data Flow on Southern Narratives

The digital revolution has widened the gap between the Global South and the North. Beyond theories that attribute this disparity to the North's technological dominance, the article explores how national and local policies in the South shape and influence its narratives.

Hassan Obeid
Hassan Obeid Published on: 14 Jan, 2025
Decolonise How? Humanitarian Journalism is No Ordinary Journalism

Unlike most journalism, which involves explaining societies to themselves, war reporting and foreign correspondence explain the suffering of exoticised communities to audiences back home, often within a context of profound ignorance about these othered places. Humanitarian journalism seeks to counter this with empathetic storytelling that amplifies local voices and prioritises ethical representation.

Patrick Gathara
Patrick Gathara Published on: 8 Jan, 2025
Mastering Journalistic Storytelling: The Power of Media Practices

Narration in journalism thrives when it's grounded in fieldwork and direct engagement with the story. Its primary goal is to evoke impact and empathy, centering on the human experience. However, the Arab press has often shifted this focus, favoring office-based reporting over firsthand accounts, resulting in narratives that lack genuine substance.

AJR logo
Zainab Tarhini Published on: 7 Jan, 2025
I Resigned from CNN Over its Pro-Israel Bias

  Developing as a young journalist without jeopardizing your morals has become incredibly difficult.

Ana Maria Monjardino
Ana Maria Monjardino Published on: 2 Jan, 2025
Digital Colonialism: The Global South Facing Closed Screens

After the independence of the Maghreb countries, the old resistance fighters used to say that "colonialism left through the door only to return through the window," and now it is returning in new forms of dominance through the window of digital colonialism. This control is evident in the acquisition of major technological and media companies, while the South is still looking for an alternative.

Ahmad Radwan
Ahmad Radwan Published on: 31 Dec, 2024
Independent Syrian Journalism: From Revolution to Assad's Fall

Independent Syrian journalism played a pivotal role in exposing regime corruption and documenting war crimes during the 13-year revolution, despite immense risks to journalists, including imprisonment, assassination, and exile. Operating from abroad, these journalists pioneered investigative and open-source reporting, preserving evidence, and shaping narratives that challenged the Assad regime's propaganda.

Ahmad Haj Hamdo
Ahmad Haj Hamdo Published on: 17 Dec, 2024