Al Jazeera Journalism Review

Outside image
New British Prime Minister Liz Truss waves alongside her husband Hugh O'Leary outside Downing Street in London, on September 6, 2022. Truss was not amused when a comedian made fun of her on a political show just a few days beforehand and has put pressure in the BBC not to repeat it [Toby Melville/Reuters]

When leaders can't take a joke, we must make fun of them all the more

The BBC’s decision to censor satire in future political panel shows at the behest of the UK’s new prime minister shows it is hardly different to any state-controlled media organisation operating under authoritarian regimes

 

Satire is not just a tool for speaking truth to power. It is a litmus test for democratic freedom.

This week the UK’s BBC was forced to decide to “reset” the tone of former political editor Laura Kuenssberg’s new political affairs show after a comedian took aim at the incoming prime minister, Liz Truss, who really can't take a joke.

Kuenssberg’s debut show featured a 15-minute slot with Truss who, at the time, was widely expected to be chosen as the next leader of the Conservative Party and, thus, the country’s prime minister. A panel of guests was lined up to give their verdict on the interview immediately after.

“I loved it. I thought she was very clear, she gave great clear answers,” gushed panellist Joe Lycett. “I know exactly what she is up to. Most people at home are going to feel reassured.”

It quickly became clear that Lycett, a well-known comedian, was making ample use of the satirical tool of sarcasm to underline his view that Truss had not, in fact, said anything of much use to anyone at all.

Lycett declared himself “very right-wing” before saying of Truss’s performance: “The haters will say that we’ve had 12 years of the Tories and we’re at the dregs of what they’ve got available and that Liz Truss is the backwash of the available MPs.”

The result was fury and indignation from Truss’s political team and an immediate demand that the BBC not host such guests again - one the organisation has seemingly caved in to without putting up the slightest hint of a fight. Britain's flagship for right-wing journalism, the Daily Mail, was so outraged at the mocking of the future prime minister, that it made the incident its front-page story the next day - something Lycett also joked about on Twitter:

satire

The Daily Mail's take on this was a bit rich, frankly, given its own love of making fun of left-wing politicians. Take this for example:

satire

I digress. Back to the point in hand - if the BBC is ready to roll over and cancel satire for any political leader, what, exactly, marks it out from any other state-controlled media organisation too afraid to deviate from the Party line?

This is one of the clearest signs yet that with its current Conservative leadership in place, the UK is straying dangerously far from its democratic path.

The censorship of satirists and comedians has been a strong marker of this before.

The Iranian scholar, Dr Mahmud Farjami, has lived in exile since 2010, most recently in Oslo, working for Kristiania University College. Before the revolution in Iran, satire was Farjami’s modus operandi and it was one he could freely practise, he says.

“After the coup it got tighter and tighter. My website was shut down, my daily column in Tehran Today was banned and in the end I had no job,” he told Kristiana University’s newspaper.

“I was interrogated by the Ministry of Information called Vezarat-e Ettelaat, more like the KGB. In May 2010 I realised I had to leave the country as soon as possible, especially when I was asked to go to the Court of Media.”

In Egypt, after the ousting of President Mubarak in 2011, the new elected government took a relatively soft line but after the military coup in 2013 the country headed down a newly authoritarian path, including the banning of satirical work which it considered unacceptable. The country’s most popular television satirist, Bassem Youssef, was shut down after he made fun of the army chief.

Similarly, in China - another country not known for being a bastion of democracy and free speech - the works of satirical novelist Yan Lianke are subject to an “unofficial” ban after his 2005 novel, Serve the People, featured a commander’s wife and her young lover smashing statuettes of Mao and urinating on his books. 

The UK government’s move to cut out satire on a political show is a regression. After all, it was back in 1599 that the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bishop of London banned the printing of satires and ordered the burning of any that already existed. We are supposed to have moved on from those days.

It is true that journalists in the West don’t tend to be jailed or exiled for upsetting their governments - although that may be about to change given the current persecution of Julian Assange (for the record, not my favourite “journalist” but that’s besides the point) as well as America’s propensity for “kill lists” which at least one US journalist has found himself a target of.

Furthermore, little by little, Western governments are making it easier for journalists to be prosecuted. Take Joe Biden’s Disinformation Board, for instance, which was set up to debunk fake news from Russia but has little to say on the matter of fake news about the Ukraine war emanating from Western media. What happens to any journalist who does dare to question the Western line on Ukraine?

The fact is that any government that cannot laugh at itself or tolerate jokes at its expense is on a slippery slope towards authoritarianism. Satirical writers and journalists are our gatekeepers - long may they amuse us.

Nina Montagu-Smith is editor of Al Jazeera Journalism Review

 

More Articles

Journalism in chains in Cameroon

Investigative journalists in Cameroon sometimes use treacherous means to navigate the numerous challenges that hamper the practice of their profession: the absence of the Freedom of Information Act, the criminalisation of press offenses, and the scare of the overly-broad anti-terrorism law.

Nalova Akua
Nalova Akua Published on: 12 Apr, 2024
The Perils of Journalism and the Rise of Citizen Media in Southeast Asia

Southeast Asia's media landscape is grim, with low rankings for internet and press freedom across the region. While citizen journalism has risen to fill the gaps, journalists - both professional and citizen - face significant risks due to government crackdowns and the collusion between tech companies and authorities to enable censorship and surveillance.

AJR Contributor Published on: 6 Apr, 2024
Orientalism, Imperialism and The Western Coverage of Palestine

Western mainstream media biases and defence of the Israeli narrative are connected to orientalism, racism, and imperialism, serving the interests of Western ruling political and economic elites. However, it is being challenged by global movements aiming to shed light on the realities of the conflict and express solidarity with the Palestinian population.

Joseph Daher
Joseph Daher Published on: 1 Apr, 2024
Ethical Dilemmas of Photo Editing in Media: Lessons from Kate Middleton’s Photo Controversy

Photoshop—an intelligent digital tool celebrated for enhancing the visual appearance of photographs—is a double-edged sword. While it has the power to transform and refine images, it also skillfully blurs the line between reality and fiction, challenging the legitimacy of journalistic integrity and the credibility of news media.

Anam Hussain
Anam Hussain Published on: 26 Mar, 2024
Breaking Barriers: The Rise of Citizen Journalists in India's Fight for Media Inclusion

Grassroots journalists from marginalized communities in India, including Dalits and Muslims, are challenging mainstream media narratives and bringing attention to underreported issues through digital outlets like The Mooknayak.

Hanan Zaffa
Hanan Zaffar, Jyoti Thakur Published on: 3 Mar, 2024
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

Over 1500 journalists from various US news organizations have signed an open letter criticizing the Western media's coverage of Israel's actions against Palestinians. They accuse newsrooms of dehumanizing rhetoric, bias, and the use of inflammatory language that reinforces stereotypes, lack of context, misinformation, biased language, and the focus on certain perspectives while diminishing others. They call for more accurate and critical coverage, the use of well-defined terms like "apartheid" and "ethnic cleansing," and the inclusion of Palestinian voices in reporting.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024
Silenced Voices and Digital Resilience: The Case of Quds Network

Unrecognized journalists in conflict zones face serious risks to their safety and lack of support. The Quds Network, a Palestinian media outlet, has been targeted and censored, but they continue to report on the ground in Gaza. Recognition and support for independent journalists are crucial.

Yousef Abu Watfe يوسف أبو وطفة
Yousef Abu Watfeh Published on: 21 Feb, 2024
Artificial Intelligence's Potentials and Challenges in the African Media Landscape

How has the proliferation of Artificial Intelligence impacted newsroom operations, job security and regulation in the African media landscape? And how are journalists in Africa adapting to these changes?

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 18 Feb, 2024
Media Monopoly in Brazil: How Dominant Media Houses Control the Narrative and Stifle Criticism of Israel

An in-depth analysis exploring the concentration of media ownership in Brazil by large companies, and how this shapes public and political narratives, particularly by suppressing criticism of Israel.

Al Jazeera Logo
Rita Freire & Ahmad Al Zobi Published on: 1 Feb, 2024
The Perils of Unverified News: A Case of Nonexistent Flotillas

Can you hide one thousand ships in the middle of the Mediterranean Sea? I would say not. But some of my fellow journalists seem to believe in magic.  

Ilya
Ilya U Topper Published on: 16 Jan, 2024
In the Courtroom and Beyond: Covering South Africa's Historic Legal Case Against Israel at The Hague

As South Africa takes on Israel at the International Court of Justice, the role of journalists in covering this landmark case becomes more crucial than ever. Their insights and reporting bring the complexities of international law to a global audience.

Hala Ahed
Hala Ahed Published on: 12 Jan, 2024
Did the NYTimes Manipulate the Sexual Violence Allegations of October 7?

An in-depth examination of the New York Times's investigation of alleged sexual assaults by Hamas during the Israeli war on Gaza, highlighting ethical concerns, and the impact of its reporting on the victims' families. It questions the journalistic integrity of the Times, especially in the context of Western media's portrayal of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 7 Jan, 2024
Is The New York Times Reproducing Allegations of 'Sexual Violence' to Downplay Israeli Crimes?

The New York Times' report on alleged sexual violence by Palestinian militants raises profound concerns about discrepancies in key testimonies and a biased reporting that aligns with Israeli narratives and downplays Israeli crimes in Gaza.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 31 Dec, 2023
Embedded journalism: Striking a balance between access and impartiality in war zones

The ethical implications of embedded journalism, particularly in the Israeli invasion of Gaza, raise concerns about the compromise of balance and independence in war coverage.

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 19 Dec, 2023
Through a Mexican lens: Navigating the intricacies of reporting in Palestine

A Mexican journalist's journey through the complexities of reporting on Palestine and gives tips on how to manage this kind of coverage.

Témoris Grecko
Témoris Grecko Published on: 10 Dec, 2023
Echos of Israeli Discourse in Latin American Media on Gaza

Heavily influenced by US and Israeli diplomatic efforts, Latin American media predominantly aligns with and amplifies the Israeli perspective. This divergence between political actions and media representation highlights the complex dynamics shaping Latin American coverage of the Gaza conflict.

Rita Freire Published on: 23 Nov, 2023
Critique of German media's handling of Gaza Conflict

The German media's coverage of the Gaza conflict has been criticized for being biased, presenting a distorted view of the conflict, focusing only on the Israeli perspective, and downplaying the suffering of Palestinians. This biased reporting undermines the media's role as an objective source of information and fails to provide a balanced view of the conflict.

AJR Contributor Published on: 16 Nov, 2023
Colonial legacy of surveillance: hidden world of surveillance technology in the African continent

African nations’ expenditure on surveillance technology from China, Europe and the US is a direct threat to the media, democracy and freedom of speech, and an enduring legacy of colonial surveillance practices.

Derick M
Derick Matsengarwodzi Published on: 14 Nov, 2023
How the New York Times fuelled a crackdown on journalists in India

Vague reporting and a piece ‘laden with innuendo’ by the New York Times gave Indian authorities the excuse they needed to crack down on news website Newsclick

Meer Faisal
Meer Faisal Published on: 31 Oct, 2023
Journalists feel the pain, but the story of Gaza must be told  

People don’t always want to hear the historical context behind horrifying events, resorting even to censorship, but the media must be free to provide it

Aidan
Aidan White Published on: 30 Oct, 2023
Queen Rania is absolutely right - Western media’s double standards on Gaza

Why does international media use loaded and dehumanising language about the Palestinians when reporting on the Israeli bombardment of 2.2 million people in Gaza?

Abeer Ayyoub
Abeer Ayyoub Published on: 27 Oct, 2023
'War propaganda' - Brazil’s media has abandoned journalistic standards over Gaza

Brazil’s mainstream media, in its unwavering support for Israel, is out of step with public and social media responses to the bombardment of Gaza

Bruno
Bruno Lima Rocha Beaklini Published on: 25 Oct, 2023
‘Emotional truth’ is not a cover for fabricating stories

Comedians who engage with the news should not be free to ignore the rules of ethical journalism

Akanksha
Akanksha Singh Published on: 16 Oct, 2023
Get this straight, Western media: Palestinians aren’t sub-human

Dehumanisation of Palestinians is as central to Israel’s war strategy as the deadly missiles it wields

Mitrovica
Andrew Mitrovica Published on: 10 Oct, 2023