Al Jazeera Journalism Review

A mobile screen with The Telegraph on it

Narrative Without Debate: The Telegraph’s Comment Ban on Gaza Coverage

What does it mean for readers when their voices are deliberately cut off? This content analysis of The Telegraph, a UK-based conservative newspaper known for its pro-establishment stance and alignment with right-leaning narratives, shows it systematically disabled Instagram comments on Israel-Gaza posts, blocking dissent and shaping a one-sided, pro-Israel narrative.

 

A recent analysis on UK-based newspaper, The Telegraph shows that the outlet has carried out a systematic and selective disabling of the comment feature on its Instagram posts related to the Israel-Gaza war. The action represents a deliberate attempt by the media outlet to control the narrative and divert it in favour of Israel. By turning off the comment feature on Instagram posts, especially those concerning opinion articles written about the Gaza war, The Telegraph has altered its social media account into a one-way platform without allowing democratic engagements or alternative opinions.

The study shows that The Telegraph has turned off the comment section on around 40 percent of its posts containing the keywords Gaza, Israel, and Palestine after October 7, 2023. This conclusion is based on a digital scraping of more than two thousand Instagram posts uploaded between October 7, 2023, and March 30, 2025.

The key quantitative findings include:

  • Out of more than 2,000 posts, around 240 were found to contain at least one of the three keywords. More than 90 of these posts had their comment sections disabled.
  • In October 2023, 43 out of 44 war-related Instagram posts were found to have disabled comment sections.
  • In November 2023, more than 90 percent of the posts containing related keywords were uploaded with comment sections disabled.
  • According to the word cloud analysis of captions from Instagram posts with disabled comment sections, the term ‘Israel’ appeared most frequently, mentioned over 150 times. ‘Gaza’ was mentioned around 118 times, ‘Hamas’ 94 times, while ‘Palestine’ appeared only 38 times. While “Israeli” was mentioned 65 times in the captions, the term “Palestinian” was only mentioned 19 times in total.

Surprisingly, despite it being the leading news story at the time, The Telegraph did not upload a single Instagram post about Hamas’ attack on Israel on October 7. The attack was considered the biggest security failure for Israel, and this omission can be considered as a tactic to get away from the immediate public discussion of that failure on their platform.

 

Suppression of Dissent

October is the month with the highest number of the posts related to Gaza war. All of them except one were uploaded to the Instagram without comment feature. A large number of posts with disabled comments were found either opposing Hamas or supporting the narrative promoted by Benjamin Netanyahu. The earliest post without a comment section was published by The Telegraph on October 7, titled “Israel at ‘war,’ says Netanyahu.” Within a week, The Telegraph uploaded to Instagram two articles by its own defence and foreign affairs editor, Con Coughlin. The comment sections were disabled on both posts, each openly calling for revenge for the attack on Israel.

On October 11, 2023,TheTelegraph uploaded an aerial picture showing the bodies of those killed on October 7, with the caption: “They chop the heads of women and children.” However, forensic investigations carried out by Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit, along with fact-checks by FactCheck.org and PolitiFact, confirmed that the story of babies being beheaded was false. Since the comment section was disabled on the post, no one could raise the issue under the post, nor has The Telegraph withdrawn the post.

By turning off the comment feature, the outlet succeeded in shutting down comments questioning the logic of its framing. Even in posts showing Gaza’s devastation, the outlet muted public response. On October 12, The Telegraph posted a gallery of images of the devastation happening in Gaza by the bombardments of Israel. Yet, the comment section was disabled, shielding them from backlash over their double standards, defending the war in an opinion piece while posting images of Gaza’s devastation on the very same day.

In later months, even posts describing the critical conditions in Gaza or showing emotive photos of Gazan children appeared with the comment feature turned off. Opening the comment section would have helped the readers to raise their questions around the ethics of showing images of suffering while refusing to hold Israel accountable as it happened with BBC and CNN.

For example, on February 27, the BBC posted an image of a Red Cross ambulance carrying Palestinians released by Israel, with the caption: “Israel releases Palestinian prisoners after Hamas hands over hostages’ bodies.” In the comment section, many users questioned the BBC. An Instagram user with the handle ourlifeisdelicious asked, “Why is one side called prisoners and the other hostages?” Another user, javedsabah, wrote: “I cannot believe they keep using such headlines! How about going to the Palestinian hostages and asking about their experiences? Where’s your journalism then?” Similarly, more than a hundred people commented under this BBC Instagram post, questioning its bias.

CNN also faced the backlash in the comment section when it uploaded a video to Instagram with the caption: “Israel has targeted Hamas leader Mohammed Sinwar in a strike on a hospital in southern Gaza on Tuesday evening, sources say.” The top comment on that post was from an account with the username lanzybear, who wrote: “YOU CANNOT TARGET HOSPITALS! Period. (Article 18 of the Fourth Geneva Convention; Articles 19 & 21 of Additional Protocol I.) Even if a specific person (like a combatant or commander) is believed to be inside a hospital, the attacking force must distinguish between civilians and combatants. STOP ACTING LIKE THIS WAS OK OR NORMAL. YOUR CAPTION IS BAD JOURNALISM.”

By selectively disabling comments, The Telegraph has systematically suppressed the voice of the dissent and eliminated any form of the alternative dialogue or narrative that may sprout in the comment section.

 

Pro-Israel Framing

Most of The Telegraph’s opinion article around Gaza war were uploaded to Instagram without comment feature.  The Telegraph’s first opinion article, published on October 8, was titled “Punish Iran for this despicable attack on Israeli civilians.” Bringing up Iran from nowhere within a day after the Hamas’ attack alludes to the larger narrative that the outlet wanted to frame. Multiple opinion articles were written against Iran in the month of October.

On October 13, The Telegraph also uploaded another article on Iran with the title “Iran’s Sinister Plan Is in Danger of Succeeding.” The article, penned by former secretary of state for defence Ben Wallace, was uploaded without the comment section which deterred the readers from registering their opinion on the opinion article.

Throughout October, The Telegraph continued uploading posters of opinion articles framing Hamas and Iran as real threat to the world while covering up the military actions of IDF on Gaza. On October 14, it uploaded an opinion piece by Peter Frankopan titled “Hamas’ Apocalypse Has Crafted a New World Order.” On October 15, it shared another article by Daniel Hannan titled “The West Is Truly Lost If It Cannot See Hamas for What It Really Is.” On October 18, it uploaded an opinion article by Vernon Bogdanor titled “Hamas’ Attack Was Only Motivated by Hate.”

On October 22,The Telegraph uploaded another opinion piece to Instagram titled “How Hamas Is Winning the Propaganda War Against Israel,” criticizing acceptance the Palestinian cause (often dubbed as support for Hamas). Similar to other opinion articles about Gaza, this article was also published without a comment feature, likely to avoid criticism for overlooking the mass murders of IDF which kept in the headlines of the many mainstream media.

The most obvious anti-Palestinian frame on Instagram appeared after the UN Secretary-General’s call for a ceasefire. The Telegraph published an article by Hamish de Bretton-Gordon attacking António Guterres. They uploaded a photo of Guterres with the headline ‘UN Secretary-General Must Resign.’ The Telegraph also disabled the comment section, which would likely have been flooded with criticism of their attack on Guterres and strong support for the UN’s call to end the war.

In November, when the Israeli army was continuously targeting hospitals in Gaza under the guise of “targeted attacks,” The Telegraph uploaded an article by Arsen Ostrovsky titled “Hamas are cruelly turning hospitals into targets.” By framing the story solely around alleged actions by Hamas, the article implicitly justified the ongoing strikes on civilian hospitals. Disabling the comments saved the outlet from the criticism of humanitarian workers and others who might have condemned its overt support of the genocide. In the same month, The Telegraph published another opinion article by Dominic Nichols titled “Where are the Hamas fighters?” Both articles were uploaded without the comment feature, likely to prevent criticism by the readers over covering up the atrocities carried out by IDF in Gaza.

 

Avoidance of Public Accountability

The Telegraph never posted the number of people killed in Gaza in any of its Instagram uploads. In October, it kept its feed focused on emotive articles about the Israeli hostages, even as thousands had lost their lives in Gaza by the end of the month. The emotive stories of Israeli hostages were uploaded to Instagram without the comment option to likely to suppress the call of the people to show the Palestinians arrested by the Israelis and killed in Israeli bombardment, as happened under the comment section of the BBC.

In January 2024, The Telegraph did not upload a single Instagram post related to the Gaza–Israel war, and the following months also saw a decline in its coverage. There are around a dozen posts describing the critical conditions in Gaza. Some of them cite international organizations such as the UN. In couple of its posts, The Telegraph has uploaded the photos of Gazan children with captions, but the commenting feature was still not enabled. Allowing comments would have enabled readers to question the ethics of showing Gaza’s suffering while avoiding Israel’s accountability, and to challenge the double standard of supporting Israel yet lamenting Gaza’s destruction.

A remarkable spike in the number of posts can be observed in October 2024, during the first anniversary of the Hamas attack. Surprisingly, many of them were uploaded with the commenting feature enabled, except for an opinion article by Daniel Hannan, a picture story from Gaza, and an Instagram gallery of photos from Gaza. The title of the picture story uploaded without the comment facility is a quote from a mother of Gaza: “We are paying for a war we never wanted.” Even after a year and thousands of deaths, The Telegraph continued to frame Israel’s actions because of Hamas’s conduct. By selectively disabling comments, the outlet appeared to manage the narrative it presented while limiting public engagement and calls for Israel’s accountability.

 

Two Years On

On the second anniversary of October 7, The Telegraph posted multiple stories about Israelis killed by Hamas. While the framing emphasied Israeli victims, the majority of comments expressed solidarity with Palestinians killed by Israel and condemned the ongoing genocide.

Its latest Instagram post, titled “Hamas murdered my son on Oct 7. Why won’t they give his body back?” has received 248 comments, with more than 90 percent voicing support for Palestine or denouncing Israel’s actions, many also questioning The Telegraph’s bias. One user, bellanoga, wrote: “Israel killed thousands of babies, children, and innocent civilians… Palestine shall be free.”

By disabling comments at the outset of the war, The Telegraph systematically silenced perspectives that challenged its framing. This suppression muted public calls to end the genocide and lift the siege of Gaza, effectively helping shield Israel from accountability.

 

Related Articles

MSNBC Deletes Interview with Journalist Criticising Western Media’s Bias Towards Israeli Narrative

MSNBC deleted an interview with journalist Jeremy Scahill after he criticised American media’s biased portrayal of Israeli actions in Gaza, condemning the framing of civilian casualties as "self-defence." Scahill argued that any discussion of Gaza’s leaders must address the broader context of occupation and longstanding injustices faced by Palestinians.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 27 Oct, 2024
Challenges of Unequal Data Flow on Southern Narratives

The digital revolution has widened the gap between the Global South and the North. Beyond theories that attribute this disparity to the North's technological dominance, the article explores how national and local policies in the South shape and influence its narratives.

Hassan Obeid
Hassan Obeid Published on: 14 Jan, 2025
Challenging the Narrative: Jeremy Scahill on the Need for Adversarial Journalism

Investigative journalist Jeremy Scahill calls for a revival of "adversarial journalism" to reinstate crucial professional and humanitarian values in mainstream Western media, especially regarding the coverage of the Gaza genocide.

Mohammad Zeidan
Mohammad Zeidan Published on: 10 Nov, 2024
October 7: The Battle for Narratives and the Forgotten Roots of Palestine

What is the difference between October 6th and October 7th? How did the media distort the historical context and mislead the public? Why did some Arab media strip the genocidal war from its roots? Is there an agenda behind highlighting the Israel-Hamas duality in news coverage?

Said El Hajji
Said El Hajji Published on: 21 Jan, 2025
Journalist Testimonies on Western Media Coverage of the Gaza War: The Other Narrative

In this article, we compile testimonies from journalists who have criticised their own media institutions as documented in reports, letters, or interviews. Most spoke anonymously out of fear of repercussions—because freedom of expression appears protected only until it reaches the borders of Israel. At that point, constraints emerge, editorial policies shift, and the system of double standards is activated.

Al Jazeera Journalism Review
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 29 Mar, 2025
Western Media Bias and Complicity with Israel is Beyond Borders

Once again, Western media framed civilians within the context of "collateral damage" while covering Israeli attacks on Syria. The language of international law was absent, and the tragedy of civilians affected by military strikes was completely obscured, while justifications and cover for the occupation prevailed under the banner of "maintaining national security."

Zainab Afifa
Zainab Afifa Published on: 23 Mar, 2025
Why Journalists are Speaking out Against Western Media Bias in Reporting on Israel-Palestine

The article highlights how over 1,500 journalists are speaking out against Western media's biased coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict, criticizing its dehumanizing language, lack of context, and disproportionate focus on Israeli narratives at the expense of Palestinian voices and journalistic integrity.

Belle de Jong journalist
Belle de Jong Published on: 26 Feb, 2024

More Articles

Bild Newspaper: The Story of Israel’s Propaganda Machine Specializing in Anti-Palestinian Incitement

It labelled Al Jazeera journalist Anas Al-Sharif, killed by the occupation, a “terrorist”; denies famine in Gaza; trains its journalists in Israel to promote the Zionist narrative; published forged documents leaked from Netanyahu’s office; and belongs to a media group whose charter affirms “support for Israel’s right to exist”. This is Bild, Germany’s newspaper of incitement against Palestinians, cited by Israel’s president.

Al Jazeera Journalism Review
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 7 Oct, 2025
Mental Health in Newsrooms

Newsrooms, long lauded as bastions of information, are quietly grappling with a mental health crisis, underscoring an urgent need for systemic support, emotional safety, and sustainable practices to protect those telling the world’s stories.

Faras Ghani Published on: 27 Sep, 2025
The Continent Experience: A New Kind of Newspaper for the Future of Journalism

The Continent is a new way of empowering people through quality journalism, blending the authority of newspapers with the reach of 21st-century distribution. Readers love it. That’s why we built it. It’s a model other newsrooms can learn from and one that comes with its own set of challenges.

Sipho Kings
Sipho Kings Published on: 28 Aug, 2025
Anas Al-Sharif’s Killing and the Israeli Media Narrative

Following the assassination of journalist Anas Al-Sharif, Palestinian journalists have been framed in Israeli media as legitimate military targets—part of a deliberate strategy to silence those who bear witness to the truth. This article explores how Hebrew-language media outlets have engaged in rhetoric that incites and legitimises the killing of journalists in Gaza.

Anas Abu Arqoub
Anas Abu Arqoub Published on: 19 Aug, 2025
Canadian Journalists for Justice in Palestine: A Call to Name the Killer, Not Just the Crime

How many journalists have to be killed before we name the killer? What does press freedom mean if it excludes Palestinians? In its latest strike, Israel killed an entire Al Jazeera news crew in Gaza—part of a systematic campaign to silence the last witnesses to its crimes. Canadian Journalists for Justice in Palestine (CJJP) condemns this massacre and calls on the Canadian government to end its complicity, uphold international law, and demand full accountability. This is not collateral damage. This is the targeted erasure of truth.

Samira Mohyeddin
Samira Mohyeddin Published on: 14 Aug, 2025
Monitoring of Journalistic Malpractices in Gaza Coverage

On this page, the editorial team of the Al Jazeera Journalism Review will collect news published by media institutions about the current war on Gaza that involves disinformation, bias, or professional journalistic standards and its code of ethics.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 11 Aug, 2025
From "Death Announcement" to "Eulogy": The Obituary as a Journalistic Genre

Obituaries for influential public figures have become a recognised journalistic genre, handled by seasoned reporters in major media outlets. How did this practice evolve, what defines it professionally, and how ethically acceptable is writing obituaries in advance?

Mahfoud G. Fadili
Mahfoud G. Fadili Published on: 17 Jul, 2025
Canadian Mainstream Media’s Orientalist Stance Towards Palestinians

Canadian mainstream media manufactures consent to support Israel through biased language, withholding historical context, and conflating any criticism of the Israeli state with antisemitism. When the Canadian mainstream media covers the question of Palestine, they usually frame it as a religious issue and withhold the historical and socio-political context.

Sarah Samuel
Sarah Samuel Published on: 14 Jul, 2025
Digital Dependency: Unpacking Tech Philanthropy’s Grip on Local News in the MENA

AI-driven journalism initiatives in the Middle East, often backed by philanthropic media development projects, are reshaping local newsrooms under the influence of global tech giants. These efforts, while marketed as support, risk deepening power asymmetries, fostering digital dependency, and reactivating colonial patterns of control through algorithmic systems and donor-driven agendas.

Sara Ait Khorsa
Sara Ait Khorsa Published on: 3 Jun, 2025
News Fatigue and Avoidance: How Media Overload is Reshaping Audience Engagement

A study conducted on 12,000 American adults revealed that two-thirds feel “exhausted” by the overwhelming volume of news they receive. Why is the public feeling drained by the news? Are audiences actively avoiding it, and at what psychological cost? Most importantly, how can the media rebuild trust and reconnect with its audience?

Othman Kabashi
Othman Kabashi Published on: 25 May, 2025
Journalism Associations' Fragmentation Weakening Press Freedom in Cameroon

Cameroon's fragmented media landscape has weakened collective advocacy, allowing government repression of journalists to go largely unchallenged. As press freedom declines, voices like Samuel Wazizi's are silenced, while disunity among journalists enables impunity to thrive.

Njodzeka Danhatu
Njodzeka Danhatu Published on: 20 May, 2025
Weaponized Artificial Intelligence: The Unseen Threat to Fact-Checking

How has artificial intelligence emerged as a powerful tool during wartime, and what strategies are fact-checkers adopting to confront this disruptive force in newsrooms? The work of fact-checkers has grown significantly more challenging during the genocide in Palestine, as the Israeli occupation has relied heavily on artificial intelligence to disseminate misinformation.

Ahmad Al-Arja
Ahmad Al-Arja Published on: 18 May, 2025
Fact-Checking: The Last Line of Defense Against Occupation Propaganda in Palestine

Manipulation of information, intensive propaganda campaigns, and widespread disinformation were key features of the "narrative" battle that accompanied the war on Gaza. From the very beginning, the occupation sought to provide media cover for potential war crimes, but the work of fact-checkers exposed the foundations of its propaganda.

Khaled Attia Published on: 7 May, 2025
Verifying Information Is Not Just a Technical Process

From Context Manipulation to AI-Driven Digital Campaigns, Fact-Checkers Strive to Adapt to New Strategies and Methods of Fake and Misleading News Aimed at Constructing “Alternative Narratives.” On International Fact-Checking Day, colleague Hassan Khodary presents the experience of Sanad, Al Jazeera’s fact-checking agency, with a particular focus on its work in tracking the falsehoods within the Israeli narrative surrounding the genocide against Palestine.

 Hassan KHodary
Hassan Khodary Published on: 7 Apr, 2025
Journalist Testimonies on Western Media Coverage of the Gaza War: The Other Narrative

In this article, we compile testimonies from journalists who have criticised their own media institutions as documented in reports, letters, or interviews. Most spoke anonymously out of fear of repercussions—because freedom of expression appears protected only until it reaches the borders of Israel. At that point, constraints emerge, editorial policies shift, and the system of double standards is activated.

Al Jazeera Journalism Review
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 29 Mar, 2025
Systematic Bias: How Western Media Framed the March 18 Massacre of Palestinians

On March 18, Israel launched a large-scale assault on Gaza, killing over 412 Palestinians and injuring more than 500, while Western media uncritically echoed Israel’s claim of “targeting Hamas.” Rather than exposing the massacre, coverage downplayed the death toll, delayed key facts, and framed the attacks as justified pressure on Hamas—further highlighting the double standard in valuing Palestinian lives.

Mei Shigenobu مي شيغينوبو
Mei Shigenobu Published on: 18 Mar, 2025
I Resigned from CNN Over its Pro-Israel Bias

  Developing as a young journalist without jeopardizing your morals has become incredibly difficult.

Ana Maria Monjardino
Ana Maria Monjardino Published on: 2 Jan, 2025
Is Pakistan’s Media Ignoring Climate Change?

Pakistan's media, despite its wide reach, largely neglects climate change in favor of political and economic issues, leaving the public under-informed about the causes and consequences of climate-related disasters. As a result, many Pakistanis remain unaware of the growing threats posed by climate change, which has devastating effects on the country's economy and population, as seen in the catastrophic floods of 2022.

Faras Ghani Published on: 3 Dec, 2024
What Explains the Indian Media’s Silence on Muslim Lynchings?

A review of why the Indian media is biased in its coverage of cow vigilantes' lynchings, highlighting how the killing of a Hindu boy by such vigilantes sparked widespread outrage, while the lynching of a Muslim man over similar allegations was largely ignored, reflecting deeper anti-Muslim bias under the ruling BJP government.

Saif Khaled
Saif Khalid Published on: 11 Nov, 2024
Corporate Dominance and the Erosion of Editorial Independence in Indian Media

Corporate influence in Indian media has led to widespread editorial suppression, with media owners prioritising political appeasement over journalistic integrity, resulting in a significant erosion of press freedom and diversity in news reporting.

headshot
AJR Correspondent Published on: 3 Nov, 2024
MSNBC Deletes Interview with Journalist Criticising Western Media’s Bias Towards Israeli Narrative

MSNBC deleted an interview with journalist Jeremy Scahill after he criticised American media’s biased portrayal of Israeli actions in Gaza, condemning the framing of civilian casualties as "self-defence." Scahill argued that any discussion of Gaza’s leaders must address the broader context of occupation and longstanding injustices faced by Palestinians.

A picture of the Al Jazeera Media Institute's logo, on a white background.
Al Jazeera Journalism Review Published on: 27 Oct, 2024
Voting in a Time of Genocide

The upcoming U.S. presidential election occurs against the backdrop of the ongoing genocide in Gaza, with AJ Plus prioritising marginalised voices and critically analysing Western mainstream media narratives while highlighting the undemocratic aspects of the U.S. electoral system.

Tony Karen توني كارون
Tony Karon Published on: 22 Oct, 2024
A Half-Truth is a Full Lie

Misinformation is rampant in modern conflicts, worsened by the internet and social media, where false news spreads easily. While news agencies aim to provide unbiased, fact-based reporting, their focus on brevity and hard facts often lacks the necessary context, leaving the public vulnerable to manipulation and unable to fully grasp the complexities of these issues.

Ilya إيليا توبر 
Ilya U Topper Published on: 30 Sep, 2024
How to Bring more Balance to Western Media Coverage of Israel and Palestine

How can journalists accurately cover Palestine without becoming unbalanced or biased? Here are some concrete tools and techniques for reporters to keep in mind.

A picture of the author, Megan O'Toole
Megan O'Toole Published on: 16 Sep, 2024